Germany - 3. LigaData current as of 22 July 2026

Hansa Rostock vs Ulm: match statistics

Hansa Rostock crest
Hansa Rostock
5 : 1half-time 2:0
Ulm crest
Ulm

Hansa Rostock vs Ulm: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Hansa Rostock play Ulm in 3. Liga (Germany). The match date is 11 April 2026 at 16:30. Final score: 5:1.

Current form

Hansa Rostock: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Ulm: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Hansa Rostock scores 1.95 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Ulm scores 1.29 and concedes 2.05. League average: 3.21 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Hansa Rostock 58%, Ulm 74%. Over 2.5: Hansa Rostock 63%, Ulm 66%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 64%.

xG, shots and style

Hansa Rostock has higher xG: 1.72 vs 1.43. Hansa Rostock: 14.3 shots per match, Ulm: 11.8.

Match halves

Hansa Rostock: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 1.00. Ulm: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Hansa Rostock: 76-90+ (18 goals). Ulm: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3. Liga: 3.21 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 64%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I back Hansa Rostock to win: the hosts sit 5th in the table versus Ulm’s 17th and have 15 wins this season compared to Ulm’s 8, giving them a clear sporting edge. Hansa have scored 57 goals this season and 10 in the last 5 matches, averaging 1.81 goals at home, while Ulm averages 1.31 goals away and has only 6 goals in the last 5 fixtures; additionally Hansa record an average xG of 2.02 at home versus Ulm’s 1.42 xG, meaning they create better chances. In quality-of-chances metrics the hosts average 6.06 shots on target and 17.13 shots overall per game, while Ulm manage only 3.56 on target and 12.25 total, with a similar conversion rate of 11%. Defensively the gap is even more pronounced: Ulm have conceded 63 goals this season (2.00 away) versus Hansa’s 36 (1.44 at home) and have a higher xG against (1.63 vs 1.29), so Hansa hold advantages in chance creation and defensive stability. Considering form (Hansa 2.0 pts in the last 5 matches vs Ulm 1.6), superior xG and Ulm’s markedly worse defense, I predict a home win.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
Hansa RostockUlm
12Shots9
Hansa RostockUlm
7Shots on target6
Hansa RostockUlm
1.7xG1.36
Hansa RostockUlm
5Corners3
Hansa RostockUlm
62Dangerous attacks51
Hansa RostockUlm
12Fouls14
Hansa RostockUlm
1Cards3
Hansa RostockUlm

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.95Goals scored / match1.29
Hansa RostockUlm
1.29Goals conceded / match2.05
Hansa RostockUlm
54%Average possession50%
Hansa RostockUlm
5.37Shots on target / match4.05
Hansa RostockUlm

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.26Shots per match11.82
Hansa RostockUlm
5.37Shots on target4.05
Hansa RostockUlm
13.7%Shot conversion10.9%
Hansa RostockUlm
54%Possession50%
Hansa RostockUlm
1.72xG for1.43
Hansa RostockUlm
1.38xG against1.67
Hansa RostockUlm

Shooting quality

Hansa Rostock: AttackingUlm: Balanced
Hansa RostockUlm
Accuracy (shots on target)38%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Hansa Rostock is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - Hansa Rostock · 0.8 pts / match - Ulm

Hansa Rostock
DLDWW
Season result split
47% W34% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
18-13-7
1.76 pts / match · goal difference +25
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-5-5
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Ulm
WLLDL
Season result split
24% W16% R61% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-23
0.87 pts / match · goal difference -29
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-5-11
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DDLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 2.00BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Hansa Rostock is 51% better for: goals scored per match.

1.95 goals / match - Hansa Rostock · 1.29 goals / match - Ulm

Hansa Rostock is 59% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - Hansa Rostock · 2.05 goals / match - Ulm

Hansa Rostock scoring profile: very strong

Hansa Rostock scores in 79% of matches (30 of 38 matches), while Ulm keeps a clean sheet in 13% (5 of 38 matches).

Ulm scoring profile: very strong

Ulm scores in 87% of matches (33 of 38 matches), while Hansa Rostock keeps a clean sheet in 32% (12 of 38 matches).

74Goals scored (season)49
Hansa RostockUlm
49Goals conceded (season)78
Hansa RostockUlm
3.24Average goals in match3.34
Hansa RostockUlm
12Goals scored (last 5)7
Hansa RostockUlm
12Goals conceded (last 5)10
Hansa RostockUlm

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal87%
Hansa RostockUlm
58%2 goals26%
Hansa RostockUlm
29%3 goals11%
Hansa RostockUlm
18%4 goals3%
Hansa RostockUlm

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal87%
Hansa RostockUlm
37%2 goals55%
Hansa RostockUlm
18%3 goals39%
Hansa RostockUlm
3%4 goals13%
Hansa RostockUlm

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

64%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time29%
Hansa RostockUlm
16%BTTS in both halves5%
Hansa RostockUlm
45%Scored in both halves11%
Hansa RostockUlm

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
Hansa RostockUlm
16%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Hansa RostockUlm
80%BTTS - last 580%
Hansa RostockUlm

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
Hansa RostockUlm
53%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
Hansa RostockUlm
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
Hansa RostockUlm

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Hansa RostockUlm
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
Hansa RostockUlm
21%Min. 3 goals after half-time37%
Hansa RostockUlm

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Hansa Rostock is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.61 pts / match - Hansa Rostock · 0.92 pts / match - Ulm

Hansa Rostock - half-time state
39% leading42% draw18% trailing
Ulm - half-time state
16% leading45% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.61Points per match (1st half)0.92
Hansa RostockUlm
0.95Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Hansa RostockUlm
0.63Goals conceded (1st half)0.87
Hansa RostockUlm
1.58Average goals (1st half)1.37
Hansa RostockUlm
53%Clean sheet before half-time39%
Hansa RostockUlm
42%No goal before half-time58%
Hansa RostockUlm

After half-time (2nd half)

1.61Points per match (2nd half)0.84
Hansa RostockUlm
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Hansa RostockUlm
0.66Goals conceded (2nd half)1.18
Hansa RostockUlm
1.66Average goals (2nd half)1.97
Hansa RostockUlm
53%Clean sheet after half-time34%
Hansa RostockUlm
34%No goal after half-time45%
Hansa RostockUlm

Hansa Rostock - second-half results

39% W42% R18% P
61
Half-time points
36
Half-time goals
+12
Goal difference (1st half)
61
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ulm - second-half results

16% W37% R47% P
35
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-15
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.92
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Hansa Rostock - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.000.60
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.81.6
Average goals in match2.02.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 6
Ulm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Hansa Rostock
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
12
6
16-30
17
12
31-45
13
8
46-60
7
7
61-75
18
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (18 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

Ulm
ScoredConceded
2
10
0-15
8
13
16-30
9
10
31-45
11
11
46-60
5
13
61-75
14
21
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (21). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.29
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
66%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+52%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Hansa Rostock

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Ulm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).

Teams vs league

Hansa RostockLigaUlm
Average goals in match 3.243.21 3.34
Both teams scored 58%64% 74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%64% 66%
Clean sheets 32%21% 13%
Goal before half-time 76%77% 74%
Goal after half-time 79%83% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.21
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.76
Home goals / match
1.45
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Hansa Rostock 1 - 0 - 0 Ulm. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

SSV Ulm 1846
0 : 5
FC Hansa Rostock

FAQ

What was the result of Hansa Rostock vs Ulm?

The 3. Liga match finished Hansa Rostock 5:1 Ulm. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Hansa Rostock vs Ulm?

Hansa Rostock score 1.95 goals per game on average and Ulm 1.29. The 3. Liga average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 58% of Hansa Rostock's matches and 74% of Ulm's.

What form are Hansa Rostock and Ulm in?

Over the last 5 games Hansa Rostock have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Ulm 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hansa Rostock vs Ulm?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.