Hapoel Petah Tikva vs Ironi Kiryat Shmona: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Hapoel Petah Tikva play Ironi Kiryat Shmona in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The match date is 20 December 2025 at 17:30. Final score: 4:1.

Current form

Hapoel Petah Tikva: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Ironi Kiryat Shmona: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Hapoel Petah Tikva scores 1.33 and concedes 1.58 goals per match. Ironi Kiryat Shmona scores 1.52 and concedes 1.61. League average: 2.97 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Hapoel Petah Tikva 56%, Ironi Kiryat Shmona 70%. Over 2.5: Hapoel Petah Tikva 56%, Ironi Kiryat Shmona 64%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Ironi Kiryat Shmona has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.32. Hapoel Petah Tikva: 10.7 shots per match, Ironi Kiryat Shmona: 13.2.

Match halves

Hapoel Petah Tikva: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.67. Ironi Kiryat Shmona: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.85.

Goals by minute

Hapoel Petah Tikva: 31-45+ (10 goals). Ironi Kiryat Shmona: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Israeli Premier League: 2.97 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
3 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
12Shots6
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
6Shots on target2
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
1.38xG0.82
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
7Corners1
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
28Dangerous attacks40
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
10Fouls20
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
0Cards5
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
1.33Goals scored / match1.52
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
1.58Goals conceded / match1.61
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
51%Average possession49%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
3.97Shots on target / match4.79
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.72Shots per match13.15
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
3.97Shots on target4.79
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
12.4%Shot conversion11.5%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
51%Possession49%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
1.32xG for1.58
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
1.75xG against1.56
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona

Shooting quality

Hapoel Petah Tikva: BalancedIroni Kiryat Shmona: Balanced
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
Accuracy (shots on target)37%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ironi Kiryat Shmona is 233% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Hapoel Petah Tikva · 2 pts / match - Ironi Kiryat Shmona

Hapoel Petah Tikva
LLDDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
25% W36% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-13-14
1.11 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-7-7
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 2.23BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Ironi Kiryat Shmona
WWDWL
Season result split
33% W21% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-7-15
1.21 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-8
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.85Opponent xG: 1.96BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ironi Kiryat Shmona is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - Hapoel Petah Tikva · 1.52 goals / match - Ironi Kiryat Shmona

Hapoel Petah Tikva scoring profile: strong

Hapoel Petah Tikva scores in 64% of matches (23 of 36 matches), while Ironi Kiryat Shmona keeps a clean sheet in 24% (8 of 33 matches).

Ironi Kiryat Shmona scoring profile: very strong

Ironi Kiryat Shmona scores in 88% of matches (29 of 33 matches), while Hapoel Petah Tikva keeps a clean sheet in 22% (8 of 36 matches).

48Goals scored (season)50
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
57Goals conceded (season)53
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
2.92Average goals in match3.12
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
5Goals scored (last 5)10
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
8Goals conceded (last 5)4
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal88%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
39%2 goals36%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
14%3 goals18%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
11%4 goals6%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal76%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
42%2 goals55%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
22%3 goals21%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
14%4 goals9%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

56%
Hapoel Petah Tikva - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.20 of 36 matches
70%
Ironi Kiryat Shmona - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.23 of 33 matches
55%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time33%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
6%BTTS in both halves9%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
25%Scored in both halves24%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS61%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
60%BTTS - last 540%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time48%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Hapoel Petah Tikva is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - Hapoel Petah Tikva · 1.09 pts / match - Ironi Kiryat Shmona

Hapoel Petah Tikva - half-time state
31% leading42% draw28% trailing
Ironi Kiryat Shmona - half-time state
24% leading36% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1.09
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.67
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
0.58Goals conceded (1st half)0.85
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
1.25Average goals (1st half)1.52
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
58%Clean sheet before half-time39%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
61%No goal before half-time52%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona

After half-time (2nd half)

1.14Points per match (2nd half)1.45
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.85
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1.61
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
39%Clean sheet after half-time42%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona
50%No goal after half-time36%
Hapoel Petah TikvaIroni Kiryat Shmona

Hapoel Petah Tikva - second-half results

25% W39% R36% P
48
Half-time points
24
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding81%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 25%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ironi Kiryat Shmona - second-half results

39% W27% R33% P
36
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Hapoel Petah Tikva - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.60
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Ironi Kiryat Shmona - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.40
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+2+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Hapoel Petah Tikva
ScoredConceded
8
6
0-15
6
8
16-30
10
7
31-45
8
9
46-60
8
7
61-75
8
20
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (20). Late-goal balance (76-90): -12 - late phases are a weakness.

Ironi Kiryat Shmona
ScoredConceded
9
7
0-15
5
11
16-30
8
10
31-45
9
9
46-60
8
8
61-75
11
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.02
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Hapoel Petah Tikva

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Ironi Kiryat Shmona

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
104%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).

Teams vs league

Hapoel Petah TikvaLigaIroni Kiryat Shmona
Average goals in match 2.922.97 3.12
Both teams scored 56%55% 70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%55% 64%
Clean sheets 22%27% 24%
Goal before half-time 67%67% 76%
Goal after half-time 78%78% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.97
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.55
Home goals / match
1.41
Away goals / match
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Hapoel Petah Tikva 0 - 1 - 0 Ironi Kiryat Shmona. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Hapoel Ironi Kiryat Shmona FC
0 : 0
Hapoel Petah Tikva FC

FAQ

What was the result of Hapoel Petah Tikva vs Ironi Kiryat Shmona?

The Israeli Premier League match finished Hapoel Petah Tikva 4:1 Ironi Kiryat Shmona. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Hapoel Petah Tikva vs Ironi Kiryat Shmona?

Hapoel Petah Tikva score 1.33 goals per game on average and Ironi Kiryat Shmona 1.52. The Israeli Premier League average is 2.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Hapoel Petah Tikva's matches and 70% of Ironi Kiryat Shmona's.

What form are Hapoel Petah Tikva and Ironi Kiryat Shmona in?

Over the last 5 games Hapoel Petah Tikva have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Ironi Kiryat Shmona 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hapoel Petah Tikva vs Ironi Kiryat Shmona?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Hapoel Petah Tikva vs Ironi Kiryat Shmona: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.