Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Haras El Hodood vs Coca-Cola: match statistics

Haras El Hodood crest
Haras El Hodood
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Coca-Cola crest
Coca-Cola

Haras El Hodood vs Coca-Cola: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Haras El Hodood play Coca-Cola in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match date is 8 April 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Haras El Hodood: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Coca-Cola: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Haras El Hodood scores 0.79 and concedes 1.45 goals per match. Coca-Cola scores 0.79 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Haras El Hodood 45%, Coca-Cola 48%. Over 2.5: Haras El Hodood 42%, Coca-Cola 33%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Haras El Hodood has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.22. Haras El Hodood: 10.6 shots per match, Coca-Cola: 10.3.

Match halves

Haras El Hodood: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.33. Coca-Cola: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

Haras El Hodood: 0-15 (5 goals). Coca-Cola: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Haras El Hodood sit 18th in the table with a season record of 4–6–12 and 17 goals scored, while Coca‑Cola are 13th with a 5–10–7 record and 19 goals. At home Haras averages 1.00 goals per match and has scored 4 goals in the last 5 games, whereas Coca‑Cola average just 0.73 goals on the road and have 2 goals in their last 5 away fixtures; over the last five matches the hosts have averaged 0.8 points per game versus 0.6 for the visitors. In terms of chance quality xG is similar (1.16 xG for Haras at home vs 1.12 xG for Coca‑Cola away), but the hosts convert chances more efficiently — shot conversion 11% vs 8% with a comparable shots on target average of 2.91. Defensively the hosts concede 1.36 goals per home match and the visitors 1.27 on the road, but Haras record 36% clean sheets at home versus just 9% for Coca‑Cola, and the percentage of matches without scoring is 27% for the hosts against 55% for the visitors, which limits the opponent’s offensive threat. Considering the higher conversion (11% vs 8%), lower share of matches without a goal (27% vs 55%) and marginally better recent points average (0.8 vs 0.6), I predict a home win, although a draw remains plausible given Coca‑Cola’s higher league position.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
7Shots9
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
2Shots on target1
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
1xG1.08
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
4Corners4
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
57Dangerous attacks59
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
15Fouls13
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
0Cards2
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
0.79Goals scored / match0.79
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
1.45Goals conceded / match1.03
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
46%Average possession48%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
2.91Shots on target / match3
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.61Shots per match10.27
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
2.91Shots on target3
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
7.4%Shot conversion7.7%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
46%Possession48%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
1.25xG for1.22
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
1.48xG against1.27
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola

Shooting quality

Haras El Hodood: BalancedCoca-Cola: Balanced
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
Accuracy (shots on target)27%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Coca-Cola is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Haras El Hodood · 1.2 pts / match - Coca-Cola

Haras El Hodood
LDWLL
Season result split
15% W33% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-11-17
0.79 pts / match · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-8-7
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Coca-Cola
DWDDL
Season result split
21% W48% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-16-10
1.12 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-7
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.19BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Coca-Cola is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.45 goals / match - Haras El Hodood · 1.03 goals / match - Coca-Cola

Haras El Hodood scoring profile: mixed

Haras El Hodood scores in 58% of matches (19 of 33 matches), while Coca-Cola keeps a clean sheet in 36% (12 of 33 matches).

Coca-Cola scoring profile: strong

Coca-Cola scores in 61% of matches (20 of 33 matches), while Haras El Hodood keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 matches).

26Goals scored (season)26
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
48Goals conceded (season)34
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
2.24Average goals in match1.82
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
5Goals scored (last 5)3
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
9Goals conceded (last 5)4
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal61%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
21%2 goals18%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
0%3 goals0%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
0%4 goals0%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal64%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
45%2 goals30%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
24%3 goals9%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
6%4 goals0%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time0%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
12%BTTS in both halves0%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
21%Scored in both halves9%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS30%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
40%BTTS - last 540%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time42%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time12%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola

2nd half

52%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Coca-Cola is 42% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.85 pts / match - Haras El Hodood · 1.21 pts / match - Coca-Cola

Haras El Hodood - half-time state
15% leading39% draw45% trailing
Coca-Cola - half-time state
21% leading58% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.85Points per match (1st half)1.21
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
0.45Goals scored (1st half)0.24
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
0.85Goals conceded (1st half)0.3
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
1.3Average goals (1st half)0.55
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
39%Clean sheet before half-time79%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
55%No goal before half-time79%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.06
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
0.61Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
0.94Average goals (2nd half)1.27
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
64%Clean sheet after half-time42%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola
67%No goal after half-time52%
Haras El HodoodCoca-Cola

Haras El Hodood - second-half results

15% W55% R30% P
28
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-13
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 15%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Coca-Cola - second-half results

15% W61% R24% P
40
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Haras El Hodood - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Coca-Cola - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.80
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-3+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Haras El Hodood
ScoredConceded
5
8
0-15
5
7
16-30
5
13
31-45
4
5
46-60
5
3
61-75
2
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.

Coca-Cola
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
3
2
16-30
1
3
31-45
6
5
46-60
4
8
61-75
8
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.03
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-51%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
35%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Haras El Hodood

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
148%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

Coca-Cola

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Haras El HodoodLigaCoca-Cola
Average goals in match 2.242.02 1.82
Both teams scored 45%47% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%34% 33%
Clean sheets 30%35% 36%
Goal before half-time 76%58% 42%
Goal after half-time 52%70% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Haras El Hodood 0 - 0 - 1 Coca-Cola. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Coca-Cola
1 : 0
Haras El Hodood

FAQ

What was the result of Haras El Hodood vs Coca-Cola?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Haras El Hodood 0:0 Coca-Cola. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Haras El Hodood vs Coca-Cola?

Haras El Hodood score 0.79 goals per game on average and Coca-Cola 0.79. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Haras El Hodood's matches and 48% of Coca-Cola's.

What form are Haras El Hodood and Coca-Cola in?

Over the last 5 games Haras El Hodood have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Coca-Cola 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haras El Hodood vs Coca-Cola?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Haras El Hodood vs Coca-Cola: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.