Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Haras El Hodood vs ENPPI: match statistics

Haras El Hodood crest
Haras El Hodood
1 : 0half-time 1:0
ENPPI crest
ENPPI
130%(3.93)
X40%(2.80)
230%(2.05)

Statistical analysis suggests balanced chances for both teams, favoring a draw. Haras El Hodood displays poor home form with only 25% home wins and a goal difference of -3, yet ENPPI is characterized by an extremely high percentage of away draws, reaching 75%. The visitors have better defensive organization (averaging 0.88 goals conceded away) and higher average possession (52% vs 45%), but simultaneously struggle to score effectively (38% of matches without a goal). The form of both teams in the last 5 matches is average, which further supports a draw outcome. Considering ENPPI's tendency to draw and the scoring difficulties of both sides, a sharing of points is the most likely result.

Haras El Hodood vs ENPPI: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Haras El Hodood play ENPPI in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match date is 24 February 2026 at 20:30. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Haras El Hodood: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. ENPPI: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Haras El Hodood scores 0.79 and concedes 1.45 goals per match. ENPPI scores 1.04 and concedes 0.96. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Haras El Hodood 45%, ENPPI 46%. Over 2.5: Haras El Hodood 42%, ENPPI 35%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Haras El Hodood has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.14. Haras El Hodood: 10.6 shots per match, ENPPI: 9.0.

Match halves

Haras El Hodood: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.33. ENPPI: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.54.

Goals by minute

Haras El Hodood: 0-15 (5 goals). ENPPI: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Statistical analysis suggests balanced chances for both teams, favoring a draw. Haras El Hodood displays poor home form with only 25% home wins and a goal difference of -3, yet ENPPI is characterized by an extremely high percentage of away draws, reaching 75%. The visitors have better defensive organization (averaging 0.88 goals conceded away) and higher average possession (52% vs 45%), but simultaneously struggle to score effectively (38% of matches without a goal). The form of both teams in the last 5 matches is average, which further supports a draw outcome. Considering ENPPI's tendency to draw and the scoring difficulties of both sides, a sharing of points is the most likely result.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

31Possession (%)69
Haras El HodoodENPPI
3Shots7
Haras El HodoodENPPI
2Shots on target2
Haras El HodoodENPPI
0.63xG1.08
Haras El HodoodENPPI
1Corners4
Haras El HodoodENPPI
40Dangerous attacks68
Haras El HodoodENPPI
17Fouls10
Haras El HodoodENPPI
5Cards1
Haras El HodoodENPPI

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Haras El HodoodENPPI
0.79Goals scored / match1.04
Haras El HodoodENPPI
1.45Goals conceded / match0.96
Haras El HodoodENPPI
46%Average possession50%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
2.91Shots on target / match3.12
Haras El HodoodENPPI

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.61Shots per match9
Haras El HodoodENPPI
2.91Shots on target3.12
Haras El HodoodENPPI
7.4%Shot conversion11.5%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
46%Possession50%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
1.25xG for1.14
Haras El HodoodENPPI
1.48xG against1.31
Haras El HodoodENPPI

Shooting quality

Haras El Hodood: BalancedENPPI: Balanced
Haras El HodoodENPPI
Accuracy (shots on target)27%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Haras El Hodood is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Haras El Hodood · 0.6 pts / match - ENPPI

Haras El Hodood
LDWLL
Season result split
15% W33% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-11-17
0.79 pts / match · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-8-7
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
ENPPI
DDDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
31% W46% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-12-6
1.38 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-8-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WDDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

ENPPI is 32% better for: goals scored per match.

0.79 goals / match - Haras El Hodood · 1.04 goals / match - ENPPI

ENPPI is 51% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.45 goals / match - Haras El Hodood · 0.96 goals / match - ENPPI

Haras El Hodood scoring profile: mixed

Haras El Hodood scores in 58% of matches (19 of 33 matches), while ENPPI keeps a clean sheet in 42% (11 of 26 matches).

ENPPI scoring profile: strong

ENPPI scores in 69% of matches (18 of 26 matches), while Haras El Hodood keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 matches).

26Goals scored (season)27
Haras El HodoodENPPI
48Goals conceded (season)25
Haras El HodoodENPPI
2.24Average goals in match2
Haras El HodoodENPPI
5Goals scored (last 5)5
Haras El HodoodENPPI
9Goals conceded (last 5)9
Haras El HodoodENPPI

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal69%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
21%2 goals27%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
0%3 goals8%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
0%4 goals0%
Haras El HodoodENPPI

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal58%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
45%2 goals31%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
24%3 goals8%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
6%4 goals0%
Haras El HodoodENPPI

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time19%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
12%BTTS in both halves0%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
21%Scored in both halves15%
Haras El HodoodENPPI

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
40%BTTS - last 560%
Haras El HodoodENPPI

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Haras El HodoodENPPI

2nd half

52%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
Haras El HodoodENPPI

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

ENPPI is 45% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.85 pts / match - Haras El Hodood · 1.23 pts / match - ENPPI

Haras El Hodood - half-time state
15% leading39% draw45% trailing
ENPPI - half-time state
27% leading42% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.85Points per match (1st half)1.23
Haras El HodoodENPPI
0.45Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Haras El HodoodENPPI
0.85Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
Haras El HodoodENPPI
1.3Average goals (1st half)1.08
Haras El HodoodENPPI
39%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
55%No goal before half-time58%
Haras El HodoodENPPI

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.38
Haras El HodoodENPPI
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.54
Haras El HodoodENPPI
0.61Goals conceded (2nd half)0.38
Haras El HodoodENPPI
0.94Average goals (2nd half)0.92
Haras El HodoodENPPI
64%Clean sheet after half-time69%
Haras El HodoodENPPI
67%No goal after half-time58%
Haras El HodoodENPPI

Haras El Hodood - second-half results

15% W55% R30% P
28
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-13
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 15%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

ENPPI - second-half results

31% W46% R23% P
32
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Haras El Hodood - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
ENPPI - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.80.2
Goals conceded / match1.40.4
Average goals in match2.20.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%0%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Haras El Hodood
ScoredConceded
5
8
0-15
5
7
16-30
5
13
31-45
4
5
46-60
5
3
61-75
2
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.

ENPPI
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
3
7
16-30
6
6
31-45
4
3
46-60
3
2
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.12
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Haras El Hodood

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
148%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

ENPPI

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.78
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Haras El HodoodLigaENPPI
Average goals in match 2.242.02 2.00
Both teams scored 45%47% 46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%34% 35%
Clean sheets 30%35% 42%
Goal before half-time 76%58% 65%
Goal after half-time 52%70% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Haras El Hodood vs ENPPI?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Haras El Hodood 1:0 ENPPI. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Haras El Hodood vs ENPPI?

Haras El Hodood score 0.79 goals per game on average and ENPPI 1.04. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Haras El Hodood's matches and 46% of ENPPI's.

What form are Haras El Hodood and ENPPI in?

Over the last 5 games Haras El Hodood have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and ENPPI 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haras El Hodood vs ENPPI?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.

Haras El Hodood - ENPPI - result and statistics | NoFluffPicks Stats