Haras El Hodood vs Kahraba Ismailia: match statistics
Haras El Hodood sits in 15th place and presents very weak form in the last five matches (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 defeats), translating to just 0.6 points per match. Kahraba Ismailia, despite occupying the last 21st place, shows improved form with 1.4 points per match in the last five meetings and remains unbeaten in this period (1 win, 4 draws). Both teams have similar efficiency rates (11% vs 10%) and possession (42% vs 43%), as well as comparable xG values, suggesting an even quality of play. The hosts hold a balanced home record of 33% wins, 33% draws, and 33% losses, while the guests win away in 29% of cases with 29% draws. Given the hosts' current weak form and the rising confidence of the guests, who have not lost their last five matches, a draw appears to be the most probable result.
Haras El Hodood vs Kahraba Ismailia: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Haras El Hodood played against Kahraba Ismailia in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on January 22, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Haras El Hodood has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Kahraba Ismailia has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Haras El Hodood scores 0.77 goals per game and allows 1.31. Kahraba Ismailia scores 0.86 and allows 1.86. Games in this league average 1.91 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 46% of Haras El Hodood's games and 57% of Kahraba Ismailia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 57%, compared with league averages of 43% for BTTS and 33% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kahraba Ismailia has the higher season xG average, 1.12 to 1.09 per game. Haras El Hodood takes 8.8 shots per game, while Kahraba Ismailia takes 8.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Haras El Hodood leads at halftime in 15% of its games and scores 0.31 goals per game after halftime. Kahraba Ismailia leads at halftime in 7% and scores 0.79 after halftime.
When the teams score
Haras El Hodood's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). For Kahraba Ismailia, it is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Egyptian Premier League games average 1.91 goals. Both teams score in 43% of games, and 33% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Haras El Hodood sits in 15th place and presents very weak form in the last five matches (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 defeats), translating to just 0.6 points per match. Kahraba Ismailia, despite occupying the last 21st place, shows improved form with 1.4 points per match in the last five meetings and remains unbeaten in this period (1 win, 4 draws). Both teams have similar efficiency rates (11% vs 10%) and possession (42% vs 43%), as well as comparable xG values, suggesting an even quality of play. The hosts hold a balanced home record of 33% wins, 33% draws, and 33% losses, while the guests win away in 29% of cases with 29% draws. Given the hosts' current weak form and the rising confidence of the guests, who have not lost their last five matches, a draw appears to be the most probable result.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Haras El Hodood | Kahraba Ismailia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kahraba Ismailia is 12% better for: goals scored per game.
0.77 goals / game - Haras El Hodood · 0.86 goals / game - Kahraba Ismailia
Haras El Hodood is 42% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.31 goals / game - Haras El Hodood · 1.86 goals / game - Kahraba Ismailia
Haras El Hodood scores in 62% of games (8 of 13 meczów), while Kahraba Ismailia keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 meczów).
Kahraba Ismailia scores in 71% of games (10 of 14 meczów), while Haras El Hodood keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Haras El Hodood
Over / Under - Kahraba Ismailia
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Haras El Hodood is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.85 pts / game - Haras El Hodood · 0.79 pts / game - Kahraba Ismailia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Haras El Hodood - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 23%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Kahraba Ismailia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 7% of games and wins 14%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.9 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Haras El Hodood
Kahraba Ismailia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Haras El Hodood | Liga | Kahraba Ismailia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.08 | 1.91 | ▲ 2.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 46% | 43% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 38% | 33% | ▲ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 31% | 38% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 55% | ▼ 43% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 46% | 68% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Haras El Hodood vs Kahraba Ismailia?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Haras El Hodood 1:2 Kahraba Ismailia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Haras El Hodood vs Kahraba Ismailia?
Haras El Hodood score 0.77 goals per game on average and Kahraba Ismailia 0.86. The Egyptian Premier League average is 1.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Haras El Hodood's matches and 57% of Kahraba Ismailia's.
What form are Haras El Hodood and Kahraba Ismailia in?
Over the last 5 games Haras El Hodood have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Kahraba Ismailia 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haras El Hodood vs Kahraba Ismailia?
The statistical background for Haras El Hodood vs Kahraba Ismailia — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.