Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Haras El Hodood vs Wadi Degla: match statistics

Haras El Hodood crest
Haras El Hodood
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Wadi Degla crest
Wadi Degla

Haras El Hodood vs Wadi Degla: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Haras El Hodood play Wadi Degla in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match date is 25 April 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Haras El Hodood: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Wadi Degla: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Haras El Hodood scores 0.79 and concedes 1.45 goals per match. Wadi Degla scores 1.27 and concedes 0.88. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Haras El Hodood 45%, Wadi Degla 58%. Over 2.5: Haras El Hodood 42%, Wadi Degla 39%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Wadi Degla has higher xG: 1.27 vs 1.25. Haras El Hodood: 10.6 shots per match, Wadi Degla: 10.7.

Match halves

Haras El Hodood: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.33. Wadi Degla: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.76.

Goals by minute

Haras El Hodood: 0-15 (5 goals). Wadi Degla: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Wadi Degla has a clear defensive edge and better form: the visitors have conceded 20 goals this season (0.83 per away game), while Haras El Hodood have conceded 37 goals this season and concede 1.31 goals per home match. In their last five matches Wadi scored 5 and conceded only 2, recording 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, yielding an average of 1.6 points per game; Haras also scored 5 in their last five but conceded 8 and failed to win any (0 wins, 3 draws, 2 losses), translating to roughly 0.6 points per game. The visitors control more possession (56% vs 44%), generate more shots (10.5 vs 9.54 average per match) and have a higher average xG (1.28 away vs 1.19 for the home side), indicating better quality of created chances. Haras draw more frequently at home (46% home draws) and win only 23% of home matches, with a home goal difference of -4, which limits their ability to secure victories. Considering Wadi’s defensive superiority, better possession and higher average xG, and the gap in recent form (1.6 points per game vs 0.6), I predict a Wadi Degla win; suggested probabilities are: visitors 55%, draw 30%, home 15%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
5Shots6
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
0Shots on target2
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
0.63xG0.81
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
3Corners6
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
42Dangerous attacks39
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
12Fouls11
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
2Cards2
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
0.79Goals scored / match1.27
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
1.45Goals conceded / match0.88
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
46%Average possession56%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
2.91Shots on target / match3.48
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.61Shots per match10.67
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
2.91Shots on target3.48
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
7.4%Shot conversion11.9%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
46%Possession56%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
1.25xG for1.27
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
1.48xG against1.12
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla

Shooting quality

Haras El Hodood: BalancedWadi Degla: Balanced
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
Accuracy (shots on target)27%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Wadi Degla is 125% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Haras El Hodood · 1.8 pts / match - Wadi Degla

Haras El Hodood
LDWLL
Season result split
15% W33% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-11-17
0.79 pts / match · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-8-7
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LDLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.81Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Wadi Degla
DWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
39% W42% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-14-6
1.61 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-8-2
Last 5 away
2-3-0
DWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Wadi Degla is 61% better for: goals scored per match.

0.79 goals / match - Haras El Hodood · 1.27 goals / match - Wadi Degla

Wadi Degla is 65% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.45 goals / match - Haras El Hodood · 0.88 goals / match - Wadi Degla

Haras El Hodood scoring profile: strong

Haras El Hodood scores in 58% of matches (19 of 33 matches), while Wadi Degla keeps a clean sheet in 33% (11 of 33 matches).

Wadi Degla scoring profile: strong

Wadi Degla scores in 73% of matches (24 of 33 matches), while Haras El Hodood keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 matches).

26Goals scored (season)42
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
48Goals conceded (season)29
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
2.24Average goals in match2.15
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
5Goals scored (last 5)9
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
9Goals conceded (last 5)6
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla

How often they score at least...

58%1 goal73%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
21%2 goals39%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
0%3 goals9%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
0%4 goals6%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal67%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
45%2 goals18%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
24%3 goals3%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
6%4 goals0%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time12%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
12%BTTS in both halves3%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
21%Scored in both halves24%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
40%BTTS - last 580%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla

2nd half

52%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Wadi Degla is 64% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.85 pts / match - Haras El Hodood · 1.39 pts / match - Wadi Degla

Haras El Hodood - half-time state
15% leading39% draw45% trailing
Wadi Degla - half-time state
30% leading48% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.85Points per match (1st half)1.39
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
0.45Goals scored (1st half)0.52
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
0.85Goals conceded (1st half)0.39
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
1.3Average goals (1st half)0.91
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
39%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
55%No goal before half-time61%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.45
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
0.61Goals conceded (2nd half)0.48
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
0.94Average goals (2nd half)1.24
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
64%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla
67%No goal after half-time42%
Haras El HodoodWadi Degla

Haras El Hodood - second-half results

15% W55% R30% P
28
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-13
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 15%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Wadi Degla - second-half results

27% W64% R9% P
46
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.39
PPG before half-time
Lead holding130%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Haras El Hodood - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Wadi Degla - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.60
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Haras El Hodood
ScoredConceded
5
8
0-15
5
7
16-30
5
13
31-45
4
5
46-60
5
3
61-75
2
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -10 - late phases are a weakness.

Wadi Degla
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
8
3
16-30
4
6
31-45
4
5
46-60
9
7
61-75
12
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.19
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Haras El Hodood

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
148%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

Wadi Degla

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-14.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Haras El HodoodLigaWadi Degla
Average goals in match 2.242.02 2.15
Both teams scored 45%47% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 42%34% 39%
Clean sheets 30%35% 33%
Goal before half-time 76%58% 61%
Goal after half-time 52%70% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+6%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Haras El Hodood 0 - 1 - 0 Wadi Degla. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Wadi Degla
1 : 1
Haras El Hodood

FAQ

What was the result of Haras El Hodood vs Wadi Degla?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Haras El Hodood 0:1 Wadi Degla. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Haras El Hodood vs Wadi Degla?

Haras El Hodood score 0.79 goals per game on average and Wadi Degla 1.27. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Haras El Hodood's matches and 58% of Wadi Degla's.

What form are Haras El Hodood and Wadi Degla in?

Over the last 5 games Haras El Hodood have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Wadi Degla 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haras El Hodood vs Wadi Degla?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.