Austria - BundesligaData current as of 23 July 2026

Hartberg vs Grazer AK: match statistics

Hartberg crest
Hartberg
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Grazer AK crest
Grazer AK
155%(2.32)
X28%(3.10)
217%(3.05)

Hartberg shows a clearly better home form with a record of 33% wins, 33% draws, and 33% losses at their home ground, while Grazer AK has very poor away results – only 11% wins and as much as 56% losses. The hosts have a positive goal difference at home (+1), scoring an average of 1.22 goals per match, while the visitors concede an average of 1.89 goals per away match with poor offensive efficiency (0.78 goals per match). Grazer AK fails to score in 44% of their away matches and has a disastrous away goal difference of -10. Hartberg boasts better xG statistics (1.17 vs 0.94) and a higher shot conversion rate (12% vs 10%), giving them an advantage in creating goal-scoring opportunities. The recent form of both teams is similar (1.2 and 1.0 points per match respectively), however, the home advantage and Hartberg's significantly better away statistics point to a home victory.

Hartberg vs Grazer AK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Hartberg play Grazer AK in Bundesliga (Austria). The match date is 21 February 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Hartberg: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Grazer AK: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Hartberg scores 1.25 and concedes 1.25 goals per match. Grazer AK scores 1.31 and concedes 1.41. League average: 2.70 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Hartberg 53%, Grazer AK 59%. Over 2.5: Hartberg 47%, Grazer AK 59%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Grazer AK has higher xG: 1.13 vs 1.03. Hartberg: 9.2 shots per match, Grazer AK: 10.1.

Match halves

Hartberg: half-time lead 41%, second-half goals 0.59. Grazer AK: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.78.

Goals by minute

Hartberg: 16-30 (8 goals). Grazer AK: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Bundesliga: 2.70 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Hartberg shows a clearly better home form with a record of 33% wins, 33% draws, and 33% losses at their home ground, while Grazer AK has very poor away results – only 11% wins and as much as 56% losses. The hosts have a positive goal difference at home (+1), scoring an average of 1.22 goals per match, while the visitors concede an average of 1.89 goals per away match with poor offensive efficiency (0.78 goals per match). Grazer AK fails to score in 44% of their away matches and has a disastrous away goal difference of -10. Hartberg boasts better xG statistics (1.17 vs 0.94) and a higher shot conversion rate (12% vs 10%), giving them an advantage in creating goal-scoring opportunities. The recent form of both teams is similar (1.2 and 1.0 points per match respectively), however, the home advantage and Hartberg's significantly better away statistics point to a home victory.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
HartbergGrazer AK
11Shots8
HartbergGrazer AK
5Shots on target2
HartbergGrazer AK
1.34xG1.06
HartbergGrazer AK
5Corners5
HartbergGrazer AK
40Dangerous attacks57
HartbergGrazer AK
11Fouls11
HartbergGrazer AK
2Cards1
HartbergGrazer AK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.25Goals scored / match1.31
HartbergGrazer AK
1.25Goals conceded / match1.41
HartbergGrazer AK
39%Average possession48%
HartbergGrazer AK
3.41Shots on target / match3.5
HartbergGrazer AK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.16Shots per match10.06
HartbergGrazer AK
3.41Shots on target3.5
HartbergGrazer AK
13.7%Shot conversion13%
HartbergGrazer AK
39%Possession48%
HartbergGrazer AK
1.03xG for1.13
HartbergGrazer AK
1.79xG against1.36
HartbergGrazer AK

Shooting quality

Hartberg: Counter-attackingGrazer AK: Efficient finishing
HartbergGrazer AK
Accuracy (shots on target)37%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Grazer AK is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Hartberg · 1.4 pts / match - Grazer AK

Hartberg
WLLLW
Season result split
31% W38% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-12-10
1.31 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-7
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 0.95Opponent xG: 1.98BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Grazer AK
LLWDW
Season result split
28% W31% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-10-13
1.16 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-3-10
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Grazer AK is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.25 goals / match - Hartberg · 1.31 goals / match - Grazer AK

Hartberg is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.25 goals / match - Hartberg · 1.41 goals / match - Grazer AK

Hartberg scoring profile: very strong

Hartberg scores in 69% of matches (22 of 32 matches), while Grazer AK keeps a clean sheet in 16% (5 of 32 matches).

Grazer AK scoring profile: strong

Grazer AK scores in 69% of matches (22 of 32 matches), while Hartberg keeps a clean sheet in 31% (10 of 32 matches).

40Goals scored (season)42
HartbergGrazer AK
40Goals conceded (season)45
HartbergGrazer AK
2.5Average goals in match2.72
HartbergGrazer AK
8Goals scored (last 5)10
HartbergGrazer AK
11Goals conceded (last 5)5
HartbergGrazer AK

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal69%
HartbergGrazer AK
47%2 goals38%
HartbergGrazer AK
9%3 goals16%
HartbergGrazer AK
0%4 goals6%
HartbergGrazer AK

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal84%
HartbergGrazer AK
31%2 goals38%
HartbergGrazer AK
13%3 goals13%
HartbergGrazer AK
9%4 goals3%
HartbergGrazer AK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time25%
HartbergGrazer AK
3%BTTS in both halves6%
HartbergGrazer AK
31%Scored in both halves28%
HartbergGrazer AK

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
HartbergGrazer AK
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS16%
HartbergGrazer AK
60%BTTS - last 540%
HartbergGrazer AK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
HartbergGrazer AK
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
HartbergGrazer AK
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
HartbergGrazer AK

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
HartbergGrazer AK
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
HartbergGrazer AK
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
HartbergGrazer AK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Hartberg is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.66 pts / match - Hartberg · 1.09 pts / match - Grazer AK

Hartberg - half-time state
41% leading44% draw16% trailing
Grazer AK - half-time state
22% leading44% draw34% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.66Points per match (1st half)1.09
HartbergGrazer AK
0.66Goals scored (1st half)0.53
HartbergGrazer AK
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
HartbergGrazer AK
1.06Average goals (1st half)1.22
HartbergGrazer AK
75%Clean sheet before half-time44%
HartbergGrazer AK
47%No goal before half-time56%
HartbergGrazer AK

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)1.41
HartbergGrazer AK
0.59Goals scored (2nd half)0.78
HartbergGrazer AK
0.84Goals conceded (2nd half)0.72
HartbergGrazer AK
1.44Average goals (2nd half)1.5
HartbergGrazer AK
41%Clean sheet after half-time44%
HartbergGrazer AK
53%No goal after half-time47%
HartbergGrazer AK

Hartberg - second-half results

22% W41% R38% P
53
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.66
PPG before half-time
Lead holding76%

Leads at half-time in 41% of matches and wins 31%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Grazer AK - second-half results

34% W38% R28% P
35
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
45
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Hartberg - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Grazer AK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.40
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Hartberg
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
8
3
16-30
6
4
31-45
7
5
46-60
7
6
61-75
5
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -11 - late phases are a weakness.

Grazer AK
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
8
7
16-30
6
11
31-45
8
4
46-60
6
7
61-75
11
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.61
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Hartberg

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.76
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.76
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Grazer AK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
98%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Bundesliga).

Teams vs league

HartbergLigaGrazer AK
Average goals in match 2.502.70 2.72
Both teams scored 53%55% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%51% 59%
Clean sheets 31%25% 16%
Goal before half-time 63%74% 75%
Goal after half-time 75%78% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.70
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Hartberg 0 - 1 - 0 Grazer AK. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Liebherr Grazer AK
0 : 0
TSV Hartberg

FAQ

What was the result of Hartberg vs Grazer AK?

The Bundesliga match finished Hartberg 1:0 Grazer AK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Hartberg vs Grazer AK?

Hartberg score 1.25 goals per game on average and Grazer AK 1.31. The Bundesliga average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Hartberg's matches and 59% of Grazer AK's.

What form are Hartberg and Grazer AK in?

Over the last 5 games Hartberg have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Grazer AK 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hartberg vs Grazer AK?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Hartberg vs Grazer AK: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.