Haugesund vs Kongsvinger: match statistics
Haugesund vs Kongsvinger: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Haugesund played against Kongsvinger in First Division (Norway). The game was played on June 27, 2026. Venue: Haugesund Stadion. Final score: 4:2.
Recent form
Haugesund has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Kongsvinger has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Haugesund scores 3.00 goals per game and allows 1.92. Kongsvinger scores 2.42 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 3.63 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 75% of Haugesund's games and 75% of Kongsvinger's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 83%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 72% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Haugesund has the higher season xG average, 1.87 to 1.84 per game. Haugesund takes 15.2 shots per game, while Kongsvinger takes 15.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Haugesund leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.67 goals per game after halftime. Kongsvinger leads at halftime in 42% and scores 1.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Haugesund's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (9 goals). For Kongsvinger, it is minutes 46-60 (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division games average 3.63 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 72% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Haugesund holds a clear home advantage: at home they have won 80% of matches and remain unbeaten (0% defeats); in the last 5 games they scored 20 goals (4.0 per game) and are averaging 2.4 points per match in that period. Kongsvinger sit 2nd in the table and have a 50% win rate away, but they average 1.83 goals per away match with xG for 1.69 and 17% of away games without scoring. The hosts are more efficient in finishing chances: at home they average 6.2 shots on target and an 18% conversion rate versus 6 shots on target and 13% conversion for the visitors, which translates to 2.8 goals per game for Haugesund compared to 1.83 for Kongsvinger on the road. Both teams conceded 10 goals in the last 5 matches, suggesting an open game, but Haugesund have a lower xG against (1.24 vs 1.62) and a better home goal difference (+9 vs +4 for the visitors). Considering the home record (80% wins), higher finishing efficiency and a slight xG edge, I favor the home side to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes due to strong signals from both teams: Haugesund has a seasonal BTTS rate of 83% and 80% in the last 5 matches, while Kongsvinger is 67% for the season and also 80% in their last five. Haugesund averages 3.00 goals per game this season (last 5: 4.0), Kongsvinger 1.83 (last 5: 2.6), and both teams concede 2.0 goals in their last 5 matches, which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. xG values confirm the offensive profile: in the last 5 matches xG is 2.18 for Haugesund and 2.10 for Kongsvinger with xG against of 1.35 and 1.41 respectively. Additionally, clean sheet rate is only 17% for both, the league BTTS is 57% with an average of 3.63 goals per game, and Haugesund has 100% of matches over 2.5 goals this season — all arguments favor Yes. Therefore I assign an 83% probability to BTTS and 17% to No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistics point to a goals match: Haugesund averages 3.00 goals per game, Kongsvinger 1.83, and the league average is 3.63. xG confirms an attacking edge — home xG 1.98, away xG 1.69; comparing against opponent defenses (Kongsvinger concedes xG 1.62, Haugesund concedes xG 1.28) yields an estimate of ~1.80 expected goals for the home side and 1.61 for the visitors, totaling ~3.41. Seasonal trends are clear: both teams have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, Haugesund has 100% of matches over 2.5 goals, and Kongsvinger 67%; additionally 83% of Haugesund’s home games and 67% of Kongsvinger’s away games see goals from both sides. Based on the above the safest selection is Over 1.5 (strongest signal: 100% of both teams’ season matches >1.5), which I price at ~96%. Over 2.5 also looks favorable (estimated ~75%), while Over 3.5 I assess at ~44% (i.e. Under 3.5 ~56%), so avoid taking risk on the 3.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
First-half statistics show that the visitors more often take the lead at the break — they led in 50% of matches versus 33% for the home side, and the time-distribution gives 6 away goals in the first half (2+3+1) versus 3 goals for Haugesund (0+2+1). At the same time the home team dominates after the break: they scored 15 goals in the second half (7+4+4) compared with 5 away goals (3+1+1), and the second-half goals per match average is 2.5 for Haugesund vs 0.83 for Kongsvinger. This aligns with better chance creation and efficiency for the hosts — xG 1.98 vs 1.69, shots per match 16.67 vs 14.5 and conversion 18% vs 13%, which favors turnarounds. In practice Haugesund wins 83% of games despite being behind at half-time in 50% of cases, indicating frequent comebacks after the break. Therefore the most likely Half-Time/Full-Time scenario is Kongsvinger leading at half-time and Haugesund winning after the break (2/1) — I assign this a 30% probability; next weights are 1/1 (26%) and X/1 (10%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Haugesund | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Haugesund is 20% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / game - Haugesund · 2 pts / game - Kongsvinger
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Haugesund is 24% better for: goals scored per game.
3 goals / game - Haugesund · 2.42 goals / game - Kongsvinger
Kongsvinger is 44% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.92 goals / game - Haugesund · 1.33 goals / game - Kongsvinger
Haugesund scores in 100% of games (12 of 12 meczów), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 meczów).
Kongsvinger scores in 92% of games (11 of 12 meczów), while Haugesund keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Haugesund
Over / Under - Kongsvinger
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Haugesund is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.83 pts / game - Haugesund · 1.42 pts / game - Kongsvinger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Haugesund - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Kongsvinger - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 2.8 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 80% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.00 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 2.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 3.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +8 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Haugesund
Kongsvinger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Haugesund | Liga | Kongsvinger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.92 | 3.63 | ▲ 3.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 58% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 72% | ▲ 83% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 25% | 22% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 77% | ▲ 92% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 88% | ▲ 92% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Haugesund vs Kongsvinger?
The First Division match finished Haugesund 4:2 Kongsvinger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Haugesund vs Kongsvinger?
Haugesund score 3.00 goals per game on average and Kongsvinger 2.42. The First Division average is 3.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Haugesund's matches and 75% of Kongsvinger's.
What form are Haugesund and Kongsvinger in?
Over the last 5 games Haugesund have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Kongsvinger 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haugesund vs Kongsvinger?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Haugesund vs Kongsvinger: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


