Haugesund vs Moss: match statistics
Haugesund vs Moss: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Haugesund played against Moss in First Division (Norway). The game was played on May 25, 2026. Venue: Haugesund Stadion. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Haugesund has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Moss has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Haugesund scores 2.88 goals per game and allows 1.63. Moss scores 1.63 and allows 1.88. Games in this league average 3.56 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of Haugesund's games and 75% of Moss's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 75%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 71% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Haugesund has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.65 per game. Haugesund takes 13.9 shots per game, while Moss takes 14.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Haugesund leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.75 goals per game after halftime. Moss leads at halftime in 25% and scores 1.25 after halftime.
When the teams score
Haugesund's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). For Moss, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division games average 3.56 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 71% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Haugesund is the favorite for this match: at home they have a 67% win rate, 0% losses and a positive goal difference of +4, averaging 2.33 goals scored and 1.00 conceded per game. Moss concedes an average of 2.5 goals per away match and has recorded 0 clean sheets (0%), while averaging 1.75 goals scored and a shot conversion rate of 12%. In the last 5 matches Haugesund scored 13 goals (2.6 per game), Moss scored 8 goals (1.6 per game); both teams, however, have the same points average over this period — 1.4 per game — which indicates comparable form but greater efficiency from the home side. In terms of quality of chances Haugesund averages 1.61 xG at home with xG against 1.46, while Moss generates 1.81 xG away with xG against 1.71; despite the visitors’ slightly higher xG, the hosts convert chances better (conversion 19% vs 12%). Considering the advantage in shot efficiency, more stable home defense and no defeats at home, I forecast a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a very high BTTS rate this season: Haugesund 75% and Moss 75%, well above the league average of 56%. In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 60% of Haugesund games and 80% of Moss games; moreover, recent form shows Haugesund scoring 2.6 and conceding 1.8 on average, while Moss scores 1.6 and concedes 2.2 — both sides regularly score and concede. xG and on-target shot analysis confirm offensive intent: Moss has xG_for 1.81 versus Haugesund’s xG_against 1.63 and more shots on target (6.25 vs 4.0), while Haugesund has xG_for 1.49 against Moss’s xG_against 1.71 — both teams create chances. Additionally, Moss concedes 2.5 goals per match on average this season and has 0% clean sheets, with 100% of Moss matches over 2.5 goals; Haugesund has 25% clean sheets but also 75% BTTS matches, which further supports Goal/Goal. Considering the 75%/75% season BTTS, 60%/80% in the last 5, and Moss’s high xG and conceded stats, I recommend BTTS - Yes with an estimated probability of 85%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: the home attack xG is 1.49 and the away defense xG is 1.71 — averaging to an expected 1.60 goals for Haugesund; similarly Moss attack xG is 1.81 and the home defense xG is 1.63 — expected 1.72 for the visitors, total 3.32. Season metrics show Over 1.5 occurred in 75% of Haugesund’s matches and 100% of Moss’s (average 87.5%), and both teams have BTTS at 75%, which strongly supports at least two goals in the game. Additionally the league averages 3.56 goals per match, and in the last 5 fixtures the home side scored 13 and conceded 9 (4.4 goals per match combined), the visitors scored 8 and conceded 11 (3.8 per match), so recent form is also high in terms of goals. On this basis I assess Over 1.5 at 92% probability and pick ‘over’ on the 1.5 line as the strongest signal; Over 2.5 is also strong (78%), considering season figures of 50% for the home team and 100% for the visitors on Over 2.5 and xG=3.32. I conservatively rate Over 3.5 at 44% because the xG total 3.32 is below 3.5, despite Moss historically having 75% of matches over 3.5 and Haugesund 25%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Haugesund led at the break in 50% of their matches, while Moss did not lead at the break in any (50% vs 0%), which strongly favors the home side for Half-Time. The hosts score an average of 0.5 goals by half-time versus 0.25 for the visitors and average 1.75 points at the break compared to 0.25 for Moss, so Haugesund’s lead at the break is visible and statistically significant. After the break Moss score more (1.5 goals on average vs 1.0 for the hosts), but the visitors also concede an average of 2.5 goals per match versus 1.25 for the hosts, which weakens their chances of a turnaround. Additionally, Moss have a higher xG (1.81 vs 1.49), but poorer defense and the fact that Haugesund scored as many as 4 goals in minutes 76–90 versus 1 for the visitors lead to the assessment that the home team will hold the lead; therefore I pick the 1/1 scenario (approx. 38% probability).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Haugesund | Moss | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 49% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Haugesund is 77% better for: goals scored per game.
2.88 goals / game - Haugesund · 1.63 goals / game - Moss
Haugesund is 15% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.63 goals / game - Haugesund · 1.88 goals / game - Moss
Haugesund scores in 100% of games (8 of 8 meczów), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 meczów).
Moss scores in 88% of games (7 of 8 meczów), while Haugesund keeps a clean sheet in 38% (3 of 8 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Haugesund
Over / Under - Moss
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Haugesund is 88% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.88 pts / game - Haugesund · 1 pts / game - Moss
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Haugesund - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Moss - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Haugesund
Moss
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Haugesund | Liga | Moss | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.50 | 3.56 | • 3.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 57% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 63% | 71% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 22% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 88% | 79% | ▼ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 86% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Haugesund vs Moss?
The First Division match finished Haugesund 3:1 Moss. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Haugesund vs Moss?
Haugesund score 2.88 goals per game on average and Moss 1.63. The First Division average is 3.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Haugesund's matches and 75% of Moss's.
What form are Haugesund and Moss in?
Over the last 5 games Haugesund have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Moss 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haugesund vs Moss?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


