Havelse vs Stuttgart II: match statistics
Havelse vs Stuttgart II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Havelse played against Stuttgart II in 3. Liga (Germany). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Recent form
Havelse has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Stuttgart II has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Havelse scores 1.47 goals per game and allows 2.21. Stuttgart II scores 1.26 and allows 1.65. Games in this league average 3.15 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 76% of Havelse's games and 68% of Stuttgart II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 68% and 68%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Stuttgart II has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.43 per game. Havelse takes 12.2 shots per game, while Stuttgart II takes 13.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Havelse leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 1.03 goals per game after halftime. Stuttgart II leads at halftime in 26% and scores 0.65 after halftime.
When the teams score
Havelse's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (19 goals). For Stuttgart II, it is minutes 46-60 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
3. Liga games average 3.15 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Havelse averages 1.47 goals per home match with a 13% conversion rate from 3.41 shots on target, while Stuttgart II averages 1.06 goals away from home from 3.82 shots on target and has only an 8% conversion. Visitors, however, show higher xG at 1.49 versus hosts' 1.36 and dominate possession 57% to 44%, indicating they create more chances that are not being finished. Both defenses are vulnerable: Havelse concedes 2.06 goals per home match and Stuttgart II concedes 1.94 away; in the last 5 fixtures the hosts scored 9 and conceded 11, while the visitors scored 8 and conceded 10. Havelse also has better short-term points efficiency — 1.2 points per game over the last 5 matches versus 1.0 for Stuttgart II — and a lower home loss rate (47% vs. 59% of away losses for the visitors), giving them a slight edge. Considering the hosts' higher effectiveness in the box and the visitors' tendency to lose on the road, I tip Havelse to win, although I expect an open game with goals at both ends.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes because both teams have high season percentages of matches with goals at both ends: Havelse 71% and Stuttgart II 65%, versus a league average of 64%, which favors a Goal/Goal scenario. Additionally, in the last 5 matches BTTS rates are 60% for Havelse and 100% for Stuttgart II, and both teams conceded on average 2.2 and 2.0 goals in those games, indicating defensive weaknesses. Offensively Havelse score 1.47 goals per match versus 1.06 for Stuttgart II, and xG is 1.61 vs 1.49, so both sides create roughly 1.5 xG and have realistic scoring chances. Supporting this are shot and conversion stats: 5.24 shots on target for Havelse versus 3.82 for Stuttgart II and conversion rates of 11% vs 8%, therefore I assess the probability of BTTS - Yes at 78% and No Goal at 22%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Total expected xG is 1.61 for Havelse and 1.49 for Stuttgart II, i.e. a combined 3.10 goals, which is close to the league average of 3.13. Season rates of matches over 1.5 goals are 82% for Havelse and 88% for Stuttgart II, supporting a high probability for Over 1.5; with an average of 3.10 a Poisson distribution yields about an 82% chance of more than 1.5 goals. Season Over 2.5 rates are 71% and 65%, and Poisson suggests ~60% for Over 2.5, so this line is plausible but weaker than 1.5. Over 3.5 is less certain (seasonally 35% and 41% and Poisson ~38%), therefore I recommend betting Over on the 1.5 line as the strongest signal. Additionally, Havelse averages 5.24 shots on target versus 3.82 for Stuttgart II, and both teams have scored in 71% and 65% of matches respectively, which supports the expectation of multiple goals in this fixture.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics clearly indicate Havelse's advantage in the first half: the hosts lead at the break in 7 matches (41%) while Stuttgart II leads in only 2 (12%), and the average goals at half-time are 0.88 for Havelse versus 0.35 for the visitors. Havelse also generates higher xG (1.61 vs 1.49) and records more shots on target (5.24 vs 3.82) with better conversion (11% vs 8%), which increases the likelihood of an early goal and maintaining a lead. Over the full match the hosts average 1.47 goals and 1.65 points per game, whereas Stuttgart II average 1.06 goals and 0.88 points per game, confirming Havelse’s advantage after the break as well. Additionally, both teams frequently score (BTTS 71% for the hosts vs 65% for the visitors), but only 18% of matches see both teams scoring by half-time, so the most probable scenario is Havelse leading at the break and holding on to win (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Havelse | Stuttgart II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Havelse is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Havelse · 1 pts / game - Stuttgart II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Havelse is 17% better for: goals scored per game.
1.47 goals / game - Havelse · 1.26 goals / game - Stuttgart II
Stuttgart II is 34% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.21 goals / game - Havelse · 1.65 goals / game - Stuttgart II
Havelse scores in 82% of games (28 of 34 meczów), while Stuttgart II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (5 of 34 meczów).
Stuttgart II scores in 76% of games (26 of 34 meczów), while Havelse keeps a clean sheet in 9% (3 of 34 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Havelse
Over / Under - Stuttgart II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Stuttgart II is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.94 pts / game - Havelse · 1.32 pts / game - Stuttgart II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Havelse - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 21%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Stuttgart II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Havelse
Stuttgart II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Havelse | Liga | Stuttgart II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.68 | 3.15 | ▼ 2.91 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 76% | 64% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 68% | 64% | ▲ 68% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 9% | 21% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | • 76% | 76% | ▼ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 97% | 83% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Other recorded players
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- HavelseGoalTemilola Awoyale
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Havelse's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Stuttgart II. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Havelse vs Stuttgart II?
The 3. Liga match finished Havelse 3:2 Stuttgart II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Havelse vs Stuttgart II?
Havelse score 1.47 goals per game on average and Stuttgart II 1.26. The 3. Liga average is 3.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 76% of Havelse's matches and 68% of Stuttgart II's.
What form are Havelse and Stuttgart II in?
Over the last 5 games Havelse have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Stuttgart II 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Havelse vs Stuttgart II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


