Wales - Welsh Premier LeagueNew Bridge Meadow StadiumData current as of October 16, 2026

Haverfordwest County vs Penybont: match statistics

Haverfordwest County vs Penybont: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Haverfordwest County played against Penybont in Welsh Premier League (Wales). The game was played on August 14, 2026. Venue: New Bridge Meadow Stadium. Final score: 0:3.

Recent form

Haverfordwest County has 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Penybont has 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Haverfordwest County scores 0.00 goals per game and allows 1.50. Penybont scores 1.00 and allows 0.50. Games in this league average 3.13 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 0% of Haverfordwest County's games and 50% of Penybont's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 50%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Haverfordwest County has the higher season xG average, 1.15 to 0.92 per game. Haverfordwest County takes 8.5 shots per game, while Penybont takes 7.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Haverfordwest County leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. Penybont leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Haverfordwest County's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (0 goals). For Penybont, it is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Welsh Premier League games average 3.13 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Penybont sit 6th, while Haverfordwest County are 14th, and the last five matches clearly favor the visitors: they have picked up 7 points compared with the hosts’ mere 1 point. Haverfordwest have scored just 1 goal in their last five matches and lost four of them, conceding as many as 10 goals during that run. The hosts are yet to score at home, despite creating chances worth an average xG of 1.58, which primarily points to extremely poor finishing. Penybont won their previous away fixture 2:1, average 2 goals per away game, and have never failed to score on the road. The visitors are not flawless defensively, allowing an average xG of 1.34, so a draw remains a realistic possibility; however, their advantage in form and attacking efficiency makes them the more likely winners.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Haverfordwest’s very poor scoring efficiency: the team has scored just 1 goal in its last 5 matches, averaging 0.2 per game, while both teams scored in only 20% of those fixtures. Penybont have also lacked attacking consistency, averaging 0.8 goals across their last 5 matches, with their BTTS rate likewise standing at 20%. However, the hosts have conceded an average of 2.0 goals in their last five games, with an xG against them of 1.85, giving the visitors clear grounds to find the net. Although Haverfordwest have recently generated an xG of 1.11, their actual goal output remains significantly lower, making it more likely that at least one side—most notably the hosts—will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Haverfordwest have scored just 0.2 goals per game in their last 5 matches, with only 20% of those fixtures going over the 2.5-goal line. Penybont averaged 0.8 goals per game during this period and likewise had only 40% of matches featuring at least three goals. Although the hosts conceded an average of 2.0 goals across their last five matches, the visitors’ attack generated just 0.77 xG, limiting the prospect of a very high-scoring game. The projected total of 2.25 goals is clearly below the 3.5 line, so the strongest edge lies with Under 3.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is Penybont leading at the break and winning the match, as the visitors won 100% of their matches in the available season sample, scoring an average of 2.0 goals. Haverfordwest have not won any of their last five matches, losing 80% of them and scoring just 0.2 goals per game while conceding 2.0. The difference in chance creation also clearly favors the visitors: their average xG is 1.33 compared with the hosts’ 0.57, while shots on target stand at 4.0 versus 0.0. The hosts were trailing at half-time in 4 of their last 5 appearances and failed to score a single first-half goal, whereas Penybont led after 45 minutes in 40% of their recent matches. The visitors should also be capable of holding onto their lead, having conceded an average of just 0.4 goals in the second halves of their last five matches, while Haverfordwest scored only 0.2 during that period.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 2
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

33Possession (%)67
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
4Shots9
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0Shots on target7
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0.45xG1.46
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
1Corners4
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
27Dangerous attacks55
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
9Fouls5
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
1Cards0
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0Goals scored / game1
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
1.5Goals allowed / game0.5
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
40%Average possession42%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
3Shots on target / game2
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.5Shots per game7.5
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
3Shots on target2
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0%Shot conversion13.3%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
40%Possession42%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
1.15xG for0.92
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
2.59xG against1.42
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont

Shooting quality

Haverfordwest County: BalancedPenybont: Counter-attacking
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
Accuracy (shots on target)35%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Haverfordwest County
LL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 2.59BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Penybont
DW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
50% W50% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 0.92Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Penybont is 200% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.5 goals / game - Haverfordwest County · 0.5 goals / game - Penybont

Haverfordwest County scoring profile: more difficult

Haverfordwest County scores in 0% of games (0 of 2 games), while Penybont keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 games).

Penybont scoring profile: very strong

Penybont scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 games), while Haverfordwest County keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 games).

0Goals scored (season)2
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
3Goals conceded (season)1
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
1.5Average goals per game1.5
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0Goals scored (last 5)2
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
3Goals conceded (last 5)1
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont

How often they score at least...

0%1 goal50%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0%2 goals50%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0%3 goals0%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0%4 goals0%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal50%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
50%2 goals0%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0%3 goals0%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0%4 goals0%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time50%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0%Scored in both halves0%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0%BTTS - last 550%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time50%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time0%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Penybont is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / game - Haverfordwest County · 2 pts / game - Penybont

Haverfordwest County - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
Penybont - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per game (1st half)2
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0Goals scored (1st half)1
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0.5Average goals (1st half)1.5
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
100%No goal before half-time50%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont

After half-time (2nd half)

0Points per game (2nd half)1
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0Goals scored (2nd half)0
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
1Average goals (2nd half)0
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
0%Clean sheet after half-time100%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont
100%No goal after half-time100%
Haverfordwest CountyPenybont

Haverfordwest County - second-half results

0% W0% D100% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Penybont - second-half results

0% W100% D0% L
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.5

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Haverfordwest County - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.500.00
Goals scored / game0.00.0
Goals allowed / game0.51.0
Average goals per game0.51.0
1 goal50%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%0%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Penybont - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.00
Goals scored / game1.00.0
Goals allowed / game0.50.0
Average goals per game1.50.0
1 goal50%0%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals50%0%
Clean sheet50%100%
No goal50%100%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 50% leading - 50% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 50% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Haverfordwest County
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
1
76-90

Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Penybont
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
48%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
25%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
0%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
50%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 2 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Haverfordwest County

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+1.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
0%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Penybont

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.92
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
32%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Welsh Premier League).

Teams vs league

Haverfordwest CountyLigaPenybont
Average goals per game▼ 1.503.13▼ 1.50
Both teams scored▼ 0%63%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 0%63%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▼ 0%22%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%81%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%69%▼ 0%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.13
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.56
Home goals / game
1.56
Away goals / game
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defensive advantage
+-6%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
38%
3 goals
13%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PenybontGoalMax Melbourne
  2. PenybontGoalNathan Daniel Wood
  3. Haverfordwest CountyYellow cardClayton Green
  4. Haverfordwest CountySubstitutionOn: Will HughesOff: Ben Phillips
  5. PenybontSubstitutionOn: Chris VenablesOff: Owen Pritchard
  6. PenybontSubstitutionOn: Tyler WalkerOff: Ethan Cann
  7. PenybontSubstitutionOn: Noah DaleyOff: Nathan Daniel Wood
  8. PenybontGoalNoah Daley
  9. PenybontSubstitutionOn: Ethan VaughanOff: Liam Shephard
  10. Haverfordwest CountySubstitutionOn: Panashe MakwiramitiOff: Kyle McCarthy

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Haverfordwest County's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses against Penybont. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.

Penybont FC
2 : 0
Haverfordwest County AFC
Penybont FC
2 : 1
Haverfordwest County AFC
Haverfordwest County AFC
0 : 1
Penybont FC

FAQ

What was the result of Haverfordwest County vs Penybont?

The Welsh Premier League match finished Haverfordwest County 0:3 Penybont. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Haverfordwest County and Penybont?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Haverfordwest County won 0, Penybont won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Haverfordwest County vs Penybont?

Haverfordwest County score 0.00 goals per game on average and Penybont 1.00. The Welsh Premier League average is 3.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Haverfordwest County's matches and 50% of Penybont's.

What form are Haverfordwest County and Penybont in?

Over the last 5 games Haverfordwest County have a 0-0-2 record (0.00 points per game) and Penybont 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Haverfordwest County vs Penybont?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Haverfordwest County vs Penybont: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.