Hebei Kungfu vs Meizhou Hakka: match statistics
Hebei Kungfu vs Meizhou Hakka: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Hebei Kungfu play Meizhou Hakka in China League One (China). The match date is 24 May 2026 at 13:30. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Hebei Kungfu: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Meizhou Hakka: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Hebei Kungfu scores 0.47 and concedes 1.20 goals per match. Meizhou Hakka scores 1.00 and concedes 1.93. League average: 2.56 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Hebei Kungfu 33%, Meizhou Hakka 47%. Over 2.5: Hebei Kungfu 33%, Meizhou Hakka 67%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Meizhou Hakka has higher xG: 1.11 vs 1.05. Hebei Kungfu: 9.5 shots per match, Meizhou Hakka: 8.7.
Match halves
Hebei Kungfu: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.20. Meizhou Hakka: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.47.
Goals by minute
Hebei Kungfu: 31-45+ (4 goals). Meizhou Hakka: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
China League One: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
Hebei Kungfu has a statistical advantage in chance creation — at home they average 12.5 shots and 3.75 on target with 53% possession, versus Meizhou Hakka’s 4.67 shots and 1.33 on target with 44% possession. xG also favors the hosts: home xG 1.33 compared to 0.72 for the visitors. Form is poor for both (0 wins in last 5), but Hebei have averaged 0.4 points per game over the last 5 matches versus 0 for Meizhou; the visitors have conceded 14 goals in their last 5 (2.8 per game) compared to 7 for the hosts (1.4 per game). Although Meizhou show a higher shot conversion (7% vs 4%), their lack of chances and 67% of away matches without scoring (vs 50% for hosts) weaken their prospects, so I back a Hebei victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Hebei Kungfu | Meizhou Hakka | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.18 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Meizhou Hakka is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Hebei Kungfu · 1.4 pts / match - Meizhou Hakka
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Meizhou Hakka is 113% better for: goals scored per match.
0.47 goals / match - Hebei Kungfu · 1 goals / match - Meizhou Hakka
Hebei Kungfu is 61% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.2 goals / match - Hebei Kungfu · 1.93 goals / match - Meizhou Hakka
Hebei Kungfu scores in 40% of matches (6 of 15 matches), while Meizhou Hakka keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).
Meizhou Hakka scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Hebei Kungfu keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Hebei Kungfu
Over / Under — Meizhou Hakka
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hebei Kungfu is 64% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / match - Hebei Kungfu · 0.73 pts / match - Meizhou Hakka
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hebei Kungfu - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Meizhou Hakka - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Hebei Kungfu
Meizhou Hakka
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).
Teams vs league
| Hebei Kungfu | Liga | Meizhou Hakka | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.67 | 2.56 | ▲ 2.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 52% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 50% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 27% | 29% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 47% | 71% | ▲ 93% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 72% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Hebei Kungfu vs Meizhou Hakka?
The China League One match finished Hebei Kungfu 0:1 Meizhou Hakka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Hebei Kungfu vs Meizhou Hakka?
Hebei Kungfu score 0.47 goals per game on average and Meizhou Hakka 1.00. The China League One average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Hebei Kungfu's matches and 47% of Meizhou Hakka's.
What form are Hebei Kungfu and Meizhou Hakka in?
Over the last 5 games Hebei Kungfu have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Meizhou Hakka 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hebei Kungfu vs Meizhou Hakka?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Hebei Kungfu vs Meizhou Hakka: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.