Heerenveen vs Telstar: match statistics
Heerenveen showcases significantly better form, winning four of their last five matches and averaging 2.4 points per game, while Telstar achieves only 1.4 points. The hosts hold a substantial advantage in home fixtures with a 38% win rate and an average of 1.85 goals per game, outperforming the visitors' offense (averaging 1.08 goals on the road). Telstar struggles in away matches, losing 46% of their fixtures and failing to score in 31% of cases. The xG data also favors Heerenveen (1.79 xG For vs 1.27 xG Against at home), whereas Telstar posts a negative xG balance on the road (1.32 xG For vs 2.07 xG Against). An edge in ball possession (52% vs 42%) and Heerenveen's higher shot efficiency further support predictions for a home win, though a history of draws in home matches (38%) and the unpredictability of league fixtures mean a sharing of points cannot be ruled out.
Heerenveen vs Telstar: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Heerenveen played against Telstar in Eredivisie (Netherlands). The game was played on March 14, 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
Heerenveen has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Telstar has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Heerenveen scores 1.69 goals per game and allows 1.69. Telstar scores 1.35 and allows 1.62. Games in this league average 3.20 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 73% of Heerenveen's games and 65% of Telstar's. The Over 2.5 rates are 73% and 54%, compared with league averages of 65% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Heerenveen has the higher season xG average, 1.69 to 1.45 per game. Heerenveen takes 15.4 shots per game, while Telstar takes 12.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Heerenveen leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Telstar leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.77 after halftime.
When the teams score
Heerenveen's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Telstar, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Eredivisie games average 3.20 goals. Both teams score in 65% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Heerenveen showcases significantly better form, winning four of their last five matches and averaging 2.4 points per game, while Telstar achieves only 1.4 points. The hosts hold a substantial advantage in home fixtures with a 38% win rate and an average of 1.85 goals per game, outperforming the visitors' offense (averaging 1.08 goals on the road). Telstar struggles in away matches, losing 46% of their fixtures and failing to score in 31% of cases. The xG data also favors Heerenveen (1.79 xG For vs 1.27 xG Against at home), whereas Telstar posts a negative xG balance on the road (1.32 xG For vs 2.07 xG Against). An edge in ball possession (52% vs 42%) and Heerenveen's higher shot efficiency further support predictions for a home win, though a history of draws in home matches (38%) and the unpredictability of league fixtures mean a sharing of points cannot be ruled out.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Heerenveen | Telstar | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Heerenveen is 50% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / game - Heerenveen · 1.6 pts / game - Telstar
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Heerenveen is 25% better for: goals scored per game.
1.69 goals / game - Heerenveen · 1.35 goals / game - Telstar
Heerenveen scores in 81% of games (21 of 26 meczów), while Telstar keeps a clean sheet in 15% (4 of 26 meczów).
Telstar scores in 77% of games (20 of 26 meczów), while Heerenveen keeps a clean sheet in 8% (2 of 26 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Heerenveen
Over / Under - Telstar
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Heerenveen is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.35 pts / game - Heerenveen · 1.15 pts / game - Telstar
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Heerenveen - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Telstar - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 19%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Heerenveen
Telstar
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eredivisie).
Teams vs league
| Heerenveen | Liga | Telstar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.38 | 3.20 | ▼ 2.96 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 73% | 65% | • 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 73% | 62% | ▼ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 8% | 19% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 81% | ▼ 73% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 85% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Heerenveen's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Telstar. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Heerenveen vs Telstar?
The Eredivisie match finished Heerenveen 3:0 Telstar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Heerenveen vs Telstar?
Heerenveen score 1.69 goals per game on average and Telstar 1.35. The Eredivisie average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Heerenveen's matches and 65% of Telstar's.
What form are Heerenveen and Telstar in?
Over the last 5 games Heerenveen have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Telstar 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Heerenveen vs Telstar?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.