China - China League OneData current as of 23 July 2026

Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Shanghai Jiading: match statistics

Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Shanghai Jiading: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Heilongjiang Lava Spring play Shanghai Jiading in China League One (China). The match date is 18 July 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Shanghai Jiading: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores 1.40 and concedes 1.67 goals per match. Shanghai Jiading scores 1.33 and concedes 1.07. League average: 2.56 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Heilongjiang Lava Spring 80%, Shanghai Jiading 53%. Over 2.5: Heilongjiang Lava Spring 53%, Shanghai Jiading 53%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Heilongjiang Lava Spring has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.29. Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 10.9 shots per match, Shanghai Jiading: 9.7.

Match halves

Heilongjiang Lava Spring: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.73. Shanghai Jiading: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Heilongjiang Lava Spring: 16-30 (4 goals). Shanghai Jiading: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

China League One: 2.56 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-0-1. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Heilongjiang has not won any of their last 5 matches (0-3-2), scoring 9 and conceding 14 (avg. 1.8 goals for, 2.8 against per match), while Shanghai Jiading have won 4 of their last 5 (4-0-1), scoring 7 and conceding 5 (avg. 1.4 GF, 1.0 GA). At home Heilongjiang generate a high volume of shots — 12.71 attempts and 5.00 on target on average, translating to 1.57 goals with a conversion rate of 12%, but they concede 1.86 goals per game and have 0% clean sheets, highlighting defensive issues. Shanghai Jiading away produce 7.71 shots (3.14 on target) with a higher conversion of 17%, concede 1.00 on average away; their away xG is 1.06 versus xG against 1.53, suggesting efficiency in limiting danger. The difference in form and points is significant — Shanghai average 2.4 points in the last 5 matches versus Heilongjiang’s 0.6, and sit 4th in the table versus 11th, therefore I forecast an away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
8Shots14
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
5Shots on target6
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
1.22xG1.62
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
5Corners8
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
50Dangerous attacks45
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
10Fouls9
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
2Cards1
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
1.4Goals scored / match1.33
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
1.67Goals conceded / match1.07
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
52%Average possession48%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
4.33Shots on target / match3.6
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.87Shots per match9.73
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
4.33Shots on target3.6
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
12.9%Shot conversion13.7%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
52%Possession48%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
1.34xG for1.29
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
1.5xG against1.35
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading

Shooting quality

Heilongjiang Lava Spring: BalancedShanghai Jiading: Efficient finishing
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
Accuracy (shots on target)40%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shanghai Jiading is 650% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 3 pts / match - Shanghai Jiading

Heilongjiang Lava Spring
LDLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W53% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-4
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-4-3
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
DLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Shanghai Jiading
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
53% W20% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-4
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-2
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.4 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 1.33 goals / match - Shanghai Jiading

Shanghai Jiading is 56% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.67 goals / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 1.07 goals / match - Shanghai Jiading

Heilongjiang Lava Spring scoring profile: very strong

Heilongjiang Lava Spring scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Shanghai Jiading keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 matches).

Shanghai Jiading scoring profile: very strong

Shanghai Jiading scores in 80% of matches (12 of 15 matches), while Heilongjiang Lava Spring keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 15 matches).

21Goals scored (season)20
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
25Goals conceded (season)16
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
3.07Average goals in match2.4
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
7Goals scored (last 5)8
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
13Goals conceded (last 5)3
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading

How often they score at least...

87%1 goal80%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
40%2 goals40%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
13%3 goals13%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
0%4 goals0%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading

How often they concede at least...

93%1 goal67%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
40%2 goals27%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
33%3 goals13%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
0%4 goals0%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

80%
Heilongjiang Lava Spring - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 15 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time13%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
13%BTTS in both halves0%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
27%Scored in both halves13%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
60%BTTS - last 560%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / match - Heilongjiang Lava Spring · 1.13 pts / match - Shanghai Jiading

Heilongjiang Lava Spring - half-time state
27% leading40% draw33% trailing
Shanghai Jiading - half-time state
27% leading33% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per match (1st half)1.13
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.6
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
0.73Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
1.4Average goals (1st half)1.2
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
40%Clean sheet before half-time47%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
53%No goal before half-time67%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1.67
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
0.73Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
0.93Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1.2
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
33%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading
33%No goal after half-time40%
Heilongjiang Lava SpringShanghai Jiading

Heilongjiang Lava Spring - second-half results

27% W40% R33% P
18
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding74%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shanghai Jiading - second-half results

40% W47% R13% P
17
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding196%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.40
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.01.6
Average goals in match1.82.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Shanghai Jiading - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Heilongjiang Lava Spring
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
4
4
16-30
4
3
31-45
3
6
46-60
4
4
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Shanghai Jiading
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
2
3
46-60
4
1
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.73
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-45%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Heilongjiang Lava Spring

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Shanghai Jiading

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (China League One).

Teams vs league

Heilongjiang Lava SpringLigaShanghai Jiading
Average goals in match 3.072.56 2.40
Both teams scored 80%52% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%50% 53%
Clean sheets 7%29% 33%
Goal before half-time 80%71% 73%
Goal after half-time 87%72% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.56
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / match
1.27
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Heilongjiang Lava Spring 1 - 0 - 1 Shanghai Jiading. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Shanghai Jiading City Development
0 : 2
Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC
Heilongjiang Lava Spring FC
0 : 1
Shanghai Jiading City Development

FAQ

What was the result of Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Shanghai Jiading?

The China League One match finished Heilongjiang Lava Spring 0:1 Shanghai Jiading. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Heilongjiang Lava Spring and Shanghai Jiading?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Heilongjiang Lava Spring won 1, Shanghai Jiading won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Shanghai Jiading?

Heilongjiang Lava Spring score 1.40 goals per game on average and Shanghai Jiading 1.33. The China League One average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Heilongjiang Lava Spring's matches and 53% of Shanghai Jiading's.

What form are Heilongjiang Lava Spring and Shanghai Jiading in?

Over the last 5 games Heilongjiang Lava Spring have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Shanghai Jiading 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Heilongjiang Lava Spring vs Shanghai Jiading?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.