Finland - VeikkausliigaBolt ArenaData current as of October 16, 2026

HJK vs Jaro: match statistics

HJK crest
HJK
3 : 0half-time 2:0
Jaro crest
Jaro

HJK vs Jaro: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

HJK played against Jaro in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The game was played on August 16, 2026. Venue: Bolt Arena. Final score: 3:0.

Recent form

HJK has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Jaro has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

HJK scores 1.53 goals per game and allows 1.21. Jaro scores 0.95 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 37% of HJK's games and 53% of Jaro's. The Over 2.5 rates are 53% and 58%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

HJK has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.40 per game. HJK takes 13.1 shots per game, while Jaro takes 11.8.

First-half and second-half trends

HJK leads at halftime in 42% of its games and scores 0.89 goals per game after halftime. Jaro leads at halftime in 37% and scores 0.26 after halftime.

When the teams score

HJK's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). For Jaro, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Veikkausliiga games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

HJK are clear favorites: they win 56% of their home matches, while Jaro are yet to win away from home and have lost 78% of their matches. The hosts average 1.44 goals and 4.67 shots on target per game at home, whereas Jaro score just 0.44 goals away and fail to score in 67% of their outings. The visitors’ defense concedes an average of 2.56 goals away from home, have kept a clean sheet in only 11% of matches, and have allowed chances worth an average xG of 1.75. HJK also come into the match in better form, winning 3 of their last 5 games and conceding just 4 goals in that run, while Jaro have an away goal difference of -19. The contrast between the teams’ home and away performances points to a controlled home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Jaro’s poor attacking consistency: the visitors score just 0.44 goals per match on average and failed to score in 67% of their games. Their season BTTS rate is only 33%, well below HJK’s 70% and the league average of 49%. HJK have improved defensively over their last five matches, conceding 0.8 goals per game with opponents’ xG limited to 0.99, while BTTS occurred in only 20% of those fixtures. The hosts should create chances against a Jaro defense conceding an average of 2.56 goals and allowing 1.75 xG, but the more likely scenario is that at least Jaro fail to score. The visitors’ last five appearances, with BTTS at 60%, increase the risk of a goal, but this does not offset their very low season scoring efficiency of 4% and an average of only 1.0 goal across that run.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

HJK should create more chances, averaging 4.9 shots on target per match, while Jaro concede as many as 2.56 goals per game. However, the visitors score just 0.44 goals per game on average this season and have failed to score in 67% of their matches, which clearly limits their contribution to a high-scoring game. HJK’s last five matches produced an average of 2.0 total goals, with the hosts conceding just 0.8 goals per match. The Under 3.5 line also receives additional support from seasonal trends: 70% of HJK’s matches and 67% of Jaro’s games finished below this line. HJK’s superiority could result in around 1.7 goals for the hosts, but Jaro’s poor finishing points towards a result staying within the three-goal range.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

HJK have a clear first-half advantage: they have led at the break in 50% of their matches, averaging 1.0 goals before half-time while conceding just 0.6. Jaro have been trailing after 45 minutes in 56% of their games, with a very modest average of just 0.33 goals scored in this period and 1.11 conceded. Over the course of the season, the hosts average 1.40 goals per match, while Jaro score only 0.44, and the visitors have lost 78% of their games without recording a single win. Jaro continue to look very poor after the break, averaging just 0.11 goals scored while allowing opponents 1.44, which further strengthens HJK’s chances of maintaining their lead. HJK’s last five matches have produced a 60% win rate and a 4:0 half-time goal difference, making 1/1 the most likely HT/FT outcome: HJK to lead at half-time and win at full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

56Possession (%)44
HJKJaro
14Shots11
HJKJaro
5Shots on target1
HJKJaro
1.56xG0.99
HJKJaro
4Corners4
HJKJaro
46Dangerous attacks31
HJKJaro
13Fouls13
HJKJaro
0Cards3
HJKJaro

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.53Goals scored / game0.95
HJKJaro
1.21Goals allowed / game2
HJKJaro
53%Average possession45%
HJKJaro
4.58Shots on target / game4.21
HJKJaro

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.05Shots per game11.79
HJKJaro
4.58Shots on target4.21
HJKJaro
11.7%Shot conversion8%
HJKJaro
53%Possession45%
HJKJaro
1.54xG for1.4
HJKJaro
1.39xG against1.74
HJKJaro

Shooting quality

HJK: BalancedJaro: Balanced
HJKJaro
Accuracy (shots on target)35%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

HJK is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - HJK · 1.4 pts / game - Jaro

HJK
LWWLW
Season result split
47% W21% D32% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-4-6
1.63 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.02BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Jaro
WDWLL
Season result split
16% W32% D53% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-10
0.79 pts / game · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-7
Last 5 away
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 2.35BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

HJK is 61% better for: goals scored per game.

1.53 goals / game - HJK · 0.95 goals / game - Jaro

HJK is 65% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.21 goals / game - HJK · 2 goals / game - Jaro

HJK scoring profile: very strong

HJK scores in 74% of games (14 of 19 games), while Jaro keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 games).

Jaro scoring profile: mixed

Jaro scores in 58% of games (11 of 19 games), while HJK keeps a clean sheet in 37% (7 of 19 games).

29Goals scored (season)18
HJKJaro
23Goals conceded (season)38
HJKJaro
2.74Average goals per game2.95
HJKJaro
4Goals scored (last 5)5
HJKJaro
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
HJKJaro

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal58%
HJKJaro
37%2 goals32%
HJKJaro
26%3 goals5%
HJKJaro
11%4 goals0%
HJKJaro

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal84%
HJKJaro
37%2 goals53%
HJKJaro
16%3 goals32%
HJKJaro
5%4 goals16%
HJKJaro

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time21%
HJKJaro
11%BTTS in both halves5%
HJKJaro
37%Scored in both halves16%
HJKJaro

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
HJKJaro
26%Min. 3 goals without BTTS21%
HJKJaro
20%BTTS - last 560%
HJKJaro

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

84%Min. 1 goal before half-time84%
HJKJaro
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
HJKJaro
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time21%
HJKJaro

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
HJKJaro
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
HJKJaro
26%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
HJKJaro

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

HJK is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.53 pts / game - HJK · 1.32 pts / game - Jaro

HJK - half-time state
42% leading26% draw32% trailing
Jaro - half-time state
37% leading21% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.53Points per game (1st half)1.32
HJKJaro
0.63Goals scored (1st half)0.68
HJKJaro
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.84
HJKJaro
1.16Average goals (1st half)1.53
HJKJaro
58%Clean sheet before half-time42%
HJKJaro
37%No goal before half-time53%
HJKJaro

After half-time (2nd half)

1.47Points per game (2nd half)0.63
HJKJaro
0.89Goals scored (2nd half)0.26
HJKJaro
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)1.16
HJKJaro
1.58Average goals (2nd half)1.42
HJKJaro
58%Clean sheet after half-time32%
HJKJaro
53%No goal after half-time74%
HJKJaro

HJK - second-half results

37% W37% D26% L
29
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.53
PPG before half-time
Lead holding112%

Leads at halftime in 42% of games and wins 47%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Jaro - second-half results

11% W32% D58% L
25
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding43%

Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 16%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

HJK - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.000.60
Goals scored / game0.60.2
Goals allowed / game0.21.0
Average goals per game0.81.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Jaro - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.40
Goals scored / game0.80.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game1.41.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

HJK
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
4
4
16-30
7
3
31-45
5
5
46-60
5
6
61-75
7
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Jaro
ScoredConceded
3
7
0-15
4
4
16-30
6
5
31-45
3
8
46-60
1
5
61-75
1
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.85
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+76%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

HJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Jaro

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.71
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
134%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

HJKLigaJaro
Average goals per game▲ 2.742.59▲ 2.95
Both teams scored▼ 37%49%▲ 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 53%46%▲ 58%
Clean sheets▲ 37%28%▼ 16%
Goal before half-time▲ 84%77%▲ 84%
Goal after half-time▼ 74%76%▲ 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.49
Home goals / game
1.09
Away goals / game
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defensive advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JaroYellow cardJesper Svenungsen Skau
  2. HJKSubstitutionOn: Jere KallinenOff: Mouhamed Gueye
  3. JaroSubstitutionOn: Joas VikströmOff: Abdi Mohamed Sabriye
  4. JaroYellow cardAdam Vidjeskog
  5. HJKSubstitutionOn: Lassi LappalainenOff: Teemu Pukki

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from HJK's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Jaro. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

Jaro
2 : 5
HJK
Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi
2 : 3
FF Jaro
FF Jaro
0 : 3
Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi

FAQ

What was the result of HJK vs Jaro?

The Veikkausliiga match finished HJK 3:0 Jaro. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between HJK and Jaro?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches HJK won 2, Jaro won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before HJK vs Jaro?

HJK score 1.53 goals per game on average and Jaro 0.95. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 37% of HJK's matches and 53% of Jaro's.

What form are HJK and Jaro in?

Over the last 5 games HJK have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Jaro 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for HJK vs Jaro?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.