Finland - VeikkausliigaBolt ArenaData current as of October 15, 2026

HJK vs VPS: match statistics

HJK crest
HJK
6 : 0half-time 3:0
VPS crest
VPS

HJK vs VPS: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

HJK played against VPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The game was played on October 8, 2026. Venue: Bolt Arena. Final score: 6:0.

Recent form

HJK has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. VPS has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

HJK scores 1.56 goals per game and allows 1.16. VPS scores 1.20 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.49 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 44% of HJK's games and 48% of VPS's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 36%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

HJK has the higher season xG average, 1.56 to 1.44 per game. HJK takes 13.5 shots per game, while VPS takes 12.0.

First-half and second-half trends

HJK leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 0.88 goals per game after halftime. VPS leads at halftime in 36% and scores 0.52 after halftime.

When the teams score

HJK's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). For VPS, it is minutes 0-15 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Veikkausliiga games average 2.49 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

HJK have home advantage: they win 58% of their home matches, while VPS win 33% of their away games and lose 42%. The hosts score an average of 1.67 goals at home from 13.08 shots per match, whereas the visitors manage just 0.92 goals away and fail to score in 33% of their matches. The last five games also favor HJK, who have scored 5 goals and lost once, while VPS have scored 2 goals and suffered 3 defeats. However, the gap in the quality of chances created is narrow — average xG stands at 1.53 for HJK at home and 1.45 for VPS away — and the visitors concede just 1.00 goal on average, so a draw remains a realistic outcome. Even so, HJK’s finishing and home record give them a clearer chance of victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal in favor of BTTS - No is VPS’s scoring form: the visitors have scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, and both teams did not score in any of those games. Over the season, VPS have averaged 0.92 goals per match and failed to score in 33% of their games, while HJK have kept a clean sheet in 31%. HJK have a higher goals-per-match average, 1.46 compared with VPS’s 0.92, increasing the likelihood that the visitors will fail to find the net. A counterpoint is that both teams have an identical average xG of 1.45; however, their season BTTS rates are only 46% for HJK and 50% for VPS. Therefore, the more likely scenario is that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals: this line has not been exceeded in 69% of HJK matches and 83% of VPS matches. Both teams concede an average of 1.0 goals per match this season, while VPS score only 0.92 goals per match compared with HJK’s 1.46. The last 5 matches reinforce a cautious assessment: VPS scored just 2 goals in total and did not feature in a match with at least 3 goals, although their average xG was 1.19, leaving room for improved finishing. With HJK projected to score 1.27 goals and VPS 0.85, the expected total is 2.12 goals, making Under 3.5 goals a safer choice than a lower line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time followed by an HJK win appears the most likely outcome: the hosts were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches and scored just 0.2 goals per game before half-time over that period. VPS have also scored sparingly before the break, averaging 0.4 goals in their last 5 matches, although the fact that they led at the break in 40% of those games means HJK cannot consider the opening stages risk-free. The case for a home win is supported by their season averages of 1.46 goals scored compared with 0.92 for VPS, as well as win rates of 46% versus 33% for the visitors. Their second-half form is particularly significant: HJK averaged 0.8 goals after the break in their last 5 matches, while VPS failed to score in the second half of any of them. This combination of a cautious first-half prediction and HJK’s clearer advantage late on justifies the X/1 pick.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

3 : 0
First half
3 : 0
Second half

Game stats

54Possession (%)46
HJKVPS
21Shots9
HJKVPS
10Shots on target1
HJKVPS
2.29xG1.06
HJKVPS
4Corners6
HJKVPS
38Dangerous attacks57
HJKVPS
8Fouls12
HJKVPS
0Cards2
HJKVPS

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.56Goals scored / game1.2
HJKVPS
1.16Goals allowed / game1
HJKVPS
54%Average possession47%
HJKVPS
4.48Shots on target / game4.44
HJKVPS

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.48Shots per game12.04
HJKVPS
4.48Shots on target4.44
HJKVPS
11.6%Shot conversion10%
HJKVPS
54%Possession47%
HJKVPS
1.56xG for1.44
HJKVPS
1.37xG against1.34
HJKVPS

Shooting quality

HJK: BalancedVPS: Balanced
HJKVPS
Accuracy (shots on target)33%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

HJK is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - HJK · 1.2 pts / game - VPS

HJK
LWWDD
Season result split
48% W24% D28% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-6-7
1.68 pts / game · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.64Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
VPS
WLWLL
Season result split
40% W24% D36% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-6-9
1.44 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-5
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.19Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

HJK is 30% better for: goals scored per game.

1.56 goals / game - HJK · 1.2 goals / game - VPS

VPS is 16% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.16 goals / game - HJK · 1 goals / game - VPS

HJK scoring profile: very strong

HJK scores in 76% of games (19 of 25 games), while VPS keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 games).

VPS scoring profile: strong

VPS scores in 68% of games (17 of 25 games), while HJK keeps a clean sheet in 36% (9 of 25 games).

39Goals scored (season)30
HJKVPS
29Goals conceded (season)25
HJKVPS
2.72Average goals per game2.2
HJKVPS
7Goals scored (last 5)2
HJKVPS
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
HJKVPS

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal68%
HJKVPS
44%2 goals24%
HJKVPS
24%3 goals16%
HJKVPS
8%4 goals8%
HJKVPS

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal72%
HJKVPS
32%2 goals20%
HJKVPS
16%3 goals8%
HJKVPS
4%4 goals0%
HJKVPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time16%
HJKVPS
8%BTTS in both halves0%
HJKVPS
32%Scored in both halves12%
HJKVPS

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
HJKVPS
24%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
HJKVPS
80%BTTS - last 50%
HJKVPS

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
HJKVPS
28%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
HJKVPS
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
HJKVPS

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
HJKVPS
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time28%
HJKVPS
28%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
HJKVPS

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

HJK is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.52 pts / game - HJK · 1.4 pts / game - VPS

HJK - half-time state
40% leading32% draw28% trailing
VPS - half-time state
36% leading32% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.52Points per game (1st half)1.4
HJKVPS
0.68Goals scored (1st half)0.68
HJKVPS
0.48Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
HJKVPS
1.16Average goals (1st half)1.32
HJKVPS
60%Clean sheet before half-time52%
HJKVPS
40%No goal before half-time56%
HJKVPS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.56Points per game (2nd half)1.32
HJKVPS
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)0.52
HJKVPS
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.36
HJKVPS
1.56Average goals (2nd half)0.88
HJKVPS
60%Clean sheet after half-time68%
HJKVPS
52%No goal after half-time64%
HJKVPS

HJK - second-half results

40% W36% D24% L
38
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.52
PPG before half-time
Lead holding120%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

VPS - second-half results

28% W48% D24% L
35
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

HJK - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.60
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game1.01.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
VPS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.80
Goals scored / game0.40.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.2
Average goals per game1.00.2
1 goal80%20%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

HJK
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
6
5
16-30
8
4
31-45
7
6
46-60
7
7
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

VPS
ScoredConceded
7
3
0-15
3
6
16-30
7
7
31-45
3
1
46-60
6
6
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.46
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+22%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

HJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

VPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

HJKLigaVPS
Average goals per game▲ 2.722.49▼ 2.20
Both teams scored▼ 44%49%• 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 56%44%▼ 36%
Clean sheets▲ 36%29%• 28%
Goal before half-time▲ 80%73%▲ 76%
Goal after half-time• 72%73%▼ 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.49
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / game
1.09
Away goals / game
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defensive advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. HJKSubstitutionOn: Joona VeteliOff: Lucas Lingman
  2. VPSSubstitutionOn: Dren TerrnavaOff: Antti-Ville Räisänen
  3. VPSSubstitutionOn: Casper HolmelundOff: Wilson Samake
  4. VPSYellow cardSimon Lindholm

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from HJK's perspective: 3 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against VPS. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 75% of them.

HJK
2 : 1
VPS
VPS
2 : 1
HJK
Vaasan Palloseura
0 : 2
Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi
Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi
3 : 1
Vaasan Palloseura

FAQ

What was the result of HJK vs VPS?

The Veikkausliiga match finished HJK 6:0 VPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between HJK and VPS?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches HJK won 3, VPS won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before HJK vs VPS?

HJK score 1.56 goals per game on average and VPS 1.20. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 44% of HJK's matches and 48% of VPS's.

What form are HJK and VPS in?

Over the last 5 games HJK have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and VPS 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for HJK vs VPS?

The statistical background for HJK vs VPS — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.