HNK Vukovar 1991 vs Cibalia: match statistics
HNK Vukovar 1991 vs Cibalia: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
HNK Vukovar 1991 played against Cibalia in Druga HNL (Croatia). The game was played on September 5, 2026. Venue: Stadion NK Polet. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
HNK Vukovar 1991 has 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.33 points per game. Cibalia has 1 win, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 1.67 points per game.
Scoring records
HNK Vukovar 1991 scores 1.67 goals per game and allows 2.33. Cibalia scores 1.00 and allows 0.67. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of HNK Vukovar 1991's games and 67% of Cibalia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 33%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Cibalia has the higher season xG average, 1.37 to 1.35 per game. HNK Vukovar 1991 takes 9.7 shots per game, while Cibalia takes 9.0.
First-half and second-half trends
HNK Vukovar 1991 leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Cibalia leads at halftime in 67% and scores 0.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
HNK Vukovar 1991's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). For Cibalia, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Druga HNL games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
HNK Vukovar 1991 have the home advantage: they won their only home match so far, scoring 2 goals and keeping a clean sheet. The hosts also create slightly higher-quality chances, with an average xG of 1.64 compared with Cibalia’s 1.39, while their attacking accuracy is reflected in 7 shots on target per match versus 4 for the visitors. However, Cibalia remain unbeaten in their last five matches, taking 11 points and scoring 10 goals, so their chances of securing a positive result are genuine. The visitors’ defense allows an average xG of 1.56 away from home and concedes 1 goal per match, while Vukovar average 2 goals scored at home. The hosts’ superior finishing efficiency, converting 17% of their shots compared with Cibalia’s 9%, points to a slightly higher probability of a Vukovar victory, although a draw remains a strong possibility.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both teams to score is clear, as in the current competition both HNK Vukovar 1991 and Cibalia recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches, with neither team keeping a clean sheet. In their last five games, Cibalia recorded BTTS in 100% of cases, while Vukovar did so in 60%, with the home side averaging 2.0 goals scored and 2.0 conceded, and the away side averaging 2.0 goals scored and 1.4 conceded. Both teams create enough chances: their average xG over the last five appearances stands at 1.31 for Vukovar and 1.42 for Cibalia, while their opponents allowed 1.61 and 1.60 xG respectively. Vukovar averages 8 shots on target at home, compared with Cibalia’s 4 away from home, but the visitors also score regularly, averaging 1.0 goal in the season and 2.0 over their last five matches. The “Yes” pick is also stronger than the league-average BTTS rate of 69%, although the risk lies in Cibalia’s lower season conversion rate of 9% compared with the hosts’ 17%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
HNK Vukovar 1991 score an average of 2.0 goals, while Cibalia concede an average of 1.0, which favors at least two goals for the home side or a high-scoring game overall. In their last five matches, both teams averaged 2.0 goals scored per game, while Vukovar conceded 2.0 and Cibalia 1.4 goals. Their creative potential also points to an open match: average xG stands at 1.31 for Vukovar and 1.42 for Cibalia, while both defenses allowed 1.61 and 1.60 xG, respectively. Cibalia scored in both of their last five matches, recording a 100% rate, while the competition average is 2.88 goals and 69% of matches finish with at least three goals. The strongest signal is Over 1.5, as both teams have scored at least two goals in 100% of their league matches this season, and the projected total of 2.97 is clearly above this line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal comes from Cibalia’s recent form: the visitors are unbeaten in their last five matches, winning three of them and averaging 2.0 goals scored, while Vukovar have lost two of their last five. Cibalia have been particularly strong starters, leading at the break in 80% of their recent appearances, with an average of 1.6 goals scored and only 0.6 conceded before half-time. By comparison, Vukovar led at half-time in just 20% of this run and have a negative first-half goal difference of 4:5. The hosts benefit from home advantage and average 8 shots on target compared with their opponents’ 4, but their recent defensive record shows 2.0 goals conceded per match. The most likely scenario is therefore Cibalia leading at half-time and maintaining their advantage until full-time, although Vukovar’s high average of 2.2 goals after the break increases the risk of a draw.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| HNK Vukovar 1991 | Cibalia | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 48% | 56% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Cibalia is 26% better for: last-5 form.
1.33 pts / game - HNK Vukovar 1991 · 1.67 pts / game - Cibalia
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
HNK Vukovar 1991 is 67% better for: goals scored per game.
1.67 goals / game - HNK Vukovar 1991 · 1 goals / game - Cibalia
Cibalia is 248% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.33 goals / game - HNK Vukovar 1991 · 0.67 goals / game - Cibalia
HNK Vukovar 1991 scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 games), while Cibalia keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 games).
Cibalia scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 games), while HNK Vukovar 1991 keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - HNK Vukovar 1991
Over / Under - Cibalia
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cibalia is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / game - HNK Vukovar 1991 · 2.33 pts / game - Cibalia
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
HNK Vukovar 1991 - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Cibalia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 33%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.33 | 1.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.3 | 1.7 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 67% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 67% |
| No goal | 0% | 33% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.33 | 0.67 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Average goals per game | 1.3 | 0.3 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 33% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 67% |
| No goal | 33% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
HNK Vukovar 1991
Cibalia
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Druga HNL).
Teams vs league
| HNK Vukovar 1991 | Liga | Cibalia | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.00 | 2.63 | ▼ 1.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 58% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 54% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 25% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 71% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 71% | ▼ 33% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of HNK Vukovar 1991 vs Cibalia?
The Druga HNL match finished HNK Vukovar 1991 1:1 Cibalia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before HNK Vukovar 1991 vs Cibalia?
HNK Vukovar 1991 score 1.67 goals per game on average and Cibalia 1.00. The Druga HNL average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 67% of HNK Vukovar 1991's matches and 67% of Cibalia's.
What form are HNK Vukovar 1991 and Cibalia in?
Over the last 5 games HNK Vukovar 1991 have a 1-1-1 record (1.33 points per game) and Cibalia 1-2-0 (1.67 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for HNK Vukovar 1991 vs Cibalia?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for HNK Vukovar 1991 vs Cibalia: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.