South Korea - K League 2Data current as of September 07, 2026

Hwaseong vs Busan I'Park: match statistics

Hwaseong crest
Hwaseong
3 : 2half-time 2:2
Busan I'Park crest
Busan I'Park

Hwaseong vs Busan I'Park: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Hwaseong played against Busan I'Park in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on May 17, 2026. Final score: 3:2.

Recent form

Hwaseong has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Busan I'Park has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Hwaseong scores 1.18 goals per game and allows 1.00. Busan I'Park scores 2.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.65 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 45% of Hwaseong's games and 73% of Busan I'Park's. The Over 2.5 rates are 36% and 64%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Hwaseong has the higher season xG average, 1.39 to 1.37 per game. Hwaseong takes 11.0 shots per game, while Busan I'Park takes 12.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Hwaseong leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 0.82 goals per game after halftime. Busan I'Park leads at halftime in 64% and scores 1.09 after halftime.

When the teams score

Hwaseong's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). For Busan I'Park, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

K League 2 games average 2.65 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the away win (2) because Busan I'Park clearly dominates this season: 9 wins versus 4 for Hwaseong and 22 goals scored against the hosts' 13. Away, Busan averages 2.17 goals per game, has a conversion rate of 17% and has not recorded a goalless match (0%), while Hwaseong at home scores 1.38 goals per game with an 11% conversion and 13% of matches without a goal. In terms of chance quality Hwaseong’s home xG is 1.54 versus Busan’s away xG of 1.47, but Busan converts that into more goals (2.17 vs 1.38), indicating superior finishing efficiency. Defensively the hosts look solid — they concede 1.00 goal at home on average and keep clean sheets in 50% of matches, whereas Busan concedes 1.33 goals away and has fewer clean sheets (17%), which reduces the hosts’ defensive edge. Considering the higher number of wins (9 vs 4), superior goals-per-game and conversion (2.17 and 17% vs 1.38 and 11%), I assess the probabilities as: Busan 58%, draw 24%, Hwaseong 18%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS indicators clearly favor both teams: Hwaseong has BTTS at 60% and Busan 83%, the combined average is 71.5% versus the league level of 61%. Scoring stats show Hwaseong averages 1.8 scored and 0.6 conceded per match, while Busan scores 2.17 and concedes 1.33, indicating at least Busan has a real ability to score even against a solid defense. xG analysis confirms mutual scoring potential – Busan attack xG 1.47 vs Hwaseong defense xG 1.22 and Hwaseong attack xG 1.25 vs Busan defense xG 1.64, creating chances for goals from both sides. In the last 5 matches both teams have scored 8 and conceded 4, and clean sheet percentage is 40% for Hwaseong and only 17% for Busan, which further lowers the likelihood of a goalless game. Considering the average BTTS of 71.5%, higher offensive xG and the number of goals in the last 5 matches, I assess BTTS probability at 70% vs 30% and recommend a 'Yes' bet (BTTS - Yes / Goal/Goal).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project 1.45 goals for Hwaseong and 1.35 for Busan I'Park (total 2.80), calculated as the average of offensive xG and opponent defensive xG: (1.25+1.64)/2 and (1.47+1.22)/2. Additionally, Hwaseong averages 1.8 goals scored and concedes 0.6 per match, while Busan scores 2.17 and concedes 1.33, confirming bilateral goal potential. Seasonal stats show Over 1.5 in 80% of Hwaseong’s matches and 83% of Busan’s (average 81.5%), and the fact both teams scored in 60% and 83% of games respectively strongly supports a minimum 2-goal scenario; therefore I rate Over 1.5 at 90%. For the 2.5 line the seasonal Over rate is 40% for the home side versus 83% for the away side (average 61.5%), and the estimated xG of 2.80 is above the 2.5 threshold, hence a lean towards Over 2.5 (65%). The 3.5 line is significantly less likely: seasonal Over 3.5 rates are 20%/50% (average 35%) and the estimated xG 2.80 is below 3.5, so I assign Over 3.5 35% and Under 65%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

At half-time the situation should be balanced: Hwaseong led at the break in 3 matches (60%) and scores on average 1.0 goals by half-time while conceding only 0.2, whereas Busan led at the break in 4 matches (67%) and has HT average 0.83 goals with 0.5 conceded. After the break the advantage is with Busan — the visitors score on average 1.33 goals in the second half and record 2.17 goals in second halves per match overall, and in late moments (minutes 76–90) Busan have scored 6 goals versus 2 for the hosts, suggesting greater effectiveness in decisive phases. xG also favors Busan: the visitors have 1.47 xG per match versus 1.25 for Hwaseong, while Hwaseong better restricts opponents before the break (on average 0.2 goals conceded in the first half vs 0.5 for Busan), so the first half may finish level. Additionally, the high percentage of matches with both teams scoring (60% for Hwaseong and 83% for Busan) and the higher average of goals after the break for the visitors increase the chance of a decisive Busan goal after the interval. As a result the most likely HT/FT scenario is a draw at half-time and a Busan win at full-time (X/2), therefore I assign the highest probability to this pick.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 2
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

45Possession (%)55
HwaseongBusan I'Park
17Shots16
HwaseongBusan I'Park
8Shots on target5
HwaseongBusan I'Park
1.91xG1.69
HwaseongBusan I'Park
4Corners6
HwaseongBusan I'Park
39Dangerous attacks46
HwaseongBusan I'Park
12Fouls8
HwaseongBusan I'Park
0Cards1
HwaseongBusan I'Park

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

HwaseongBusan I'Park
1.18Goals scored / game2
HwaseongBusan I'Park
1Goals allowed / game1
HwaseongBusan I'Park
48%Average possession45%
HwaseongBusan I'Park
4.09Shots on target / game4.09
HwaseongBusan I'Park

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11Shots per game12
HwaseongBusan I'Park
4.09Shots on target4.09
HwaseongBusan I'Park
10.7%Shot conversion16.7%
HwaseongBusan I'Park
48%Possession45%
HwaseongBusan I'Park
1.39xG for1.37
HwaseongBusan I'Park
1.3xG against1.45
HwaseongBusan I'Park

Shooting quality

Hwaseong: BalancedBusan I'Park: Counter-attacking
HwaseongBusan I'Park
Accuracy (shots on target)37%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.49

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Busan I'Park is 9% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / game - Hwaseong · 2.4 pts / game - Busan I'Park

Hwaseong
WDWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
36% W36% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-3
1.45 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
LWDWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Busan I'Park
WWLWW
Season result split
82% W9% R9% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-1-1
2.55 pts / game · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-0-1
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WWWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Busan I'Park is 69% better for: goals scored per game.

1.18 goals / game - Hwaseong · 2 goals / game - Busan I'Park

Hwaseong scoring profile: very strong

Hwaseong scores in 73% of games (8 of 11 meczów), while Busan I'Park keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 meczów).

Busan I'Park scoring profile: very strong

Busan I'Park scores in 100% of games (11 of 11 meczów), while Hwaseong keeps a clean sheet in 36% (4 of 11 meczów).

13Goals scored (season)22
HwaseongBusan I'Park
11Goals conceded (season)11
HwaseongBusan I'Park
2.18Average goals per game3
HwaseongBusan I'Park
8Goals scored (last 5)8
HwaseongBusan I'Park
4Goals conceded (last 5)4
HwaseongBusan I'Park

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal100%
HwaseongBusan I'Park
45%2 goals73%
HwaseongBusan I'Park
0%3 goals27%
HwaseongBusan I'Park
0%4 goals0%
HwaseongBusan I'Park

How often they concede at least...

64%1 goal73%
HwaseongBusan I'Park
27%2 goals18%
HwaseongBusan I'Park
9%3 goals9%
HwaseongBusan I'Park
0%4 goals0%
HwaseongBusan I'Park

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time18%
HwaseongBusan I'Park
0%BTTS in both halves0%
HwaseongBusan I'Park
18%Scored in both halves27%
HwaseongBusan I'Park

BTTS and goal count

36%Min. 3 goals and BTTS64%
HwaseongBusan I'Park
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
HwaseongBusan I'Park
60%BTTS - last 540%
HwaseongBusan I'Park

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time91%
HwaseongBusan I'Park
9%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
HwaseongBusan I'Park
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
HwaseongBusan I'Park

2nd half

64%Min. 1 goal after half-time64%
HwaseongBusan I'Park
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
HwaseongBusan I'Park
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time36%
HwaseongBusan I'Park

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Busan I'Park is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.27 pts / game - Hwaseong · 2.09 pts / game - Busan I'Park

Hwaseong - half-time state
36% leading18% draw45% trailing
Busan I'Park - half-time state
64% leading18% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per game (1st half)2.09
HwaseongBusan I'Park
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.91
HwaseongBusan I'Park
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
HwaseongBusan I'Park
0.91Average goals (1st half)1.27
HwaseongBusan I'Park
55%Clean sheet before half-time64%
HwaseongBusan I'Park
64%No goal before half-time27%
HwaseongBusan I'Park

After half-time (2nd half)

1.64Points per game (2nd half)1.64
HwaseongBusan I'Park
0.82Goals scored (2nd half)1.09
HwaseongBusan I'Park
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
HwaseongBusan I'Park
1.27Average goals (2nd half)1.73
HwaseongBusan I'Park
55%Clean sheet after half-time45%
HwaseongBusan I'Park
45%No goal after half-time45%
HwaseongBusan I'Park

Hwaseong - second-half results

36% W55% R9% P
14
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Busan I'Park - second-half results

36% W55% R9% P
23
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding128%

Leads at halftime in 64% of games and wins 82%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Hwaseong - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.60
Goals scored / game0.61.0
Goals allowed / game0.20.6
Average goals per game0.81.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Busan I'Park - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.20
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.6
Average goals per game1.01.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Hwaseong
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
3
1
16-30
1
3
31-45
5
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Busan I'Park
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
6
4
31-45
0
3
46-60
5
1
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.59
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
73%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Hwaseong

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.75
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Busan I'Park

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.63
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
152%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

HwaseongLigaBusan I'Park
Average goals per game 2.182.65 3.00
Both teams scored 45%61% 73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%54% 64%
Clean sheets 36%24% 27%
Goal before half-time 82%77% 91%
Goal after half-time 64%72% 64%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.65
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / game
1.32
Away goals / game
+2%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. HwaseongGoalJae-Min JegalAssist: Byung-Oh Kim
  2. HwaseongGoalJae-Min JegalAssist: Dae-Hwan Kim
  3. Busan I'ParkGoalGabriel Honorio RamosAssist: Dong-Soo Lee
  4. HwaseongSubstitutionOn: Sun-Woo HamOff: Kyung-Min Park
  5. HwaseongGoalSava PetrovAssist: Jae-Seong Park
  6. Busan I'ParkSubstitutionOn: Ju-Sung WooOff: Se-Hoon Kim
  7. Busan I'ParkYellow cardAntonio Xavier Rodrigues Neto

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Hwaseong's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss against Busan I'Park. Games average 2.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

Hwaseong FC
1 : 1
Busan I'Park
Hwaseong FC
1 : 0
Busan I'Park
Busan I'Park
3 : 2
Hwaseong FC

FAQ

What was the result of Hwaseong vs Busan I'Park?

The K League 2 match finished Hwaseong 3:2 Busan I'Park. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Hwaseong and Busan I'Park?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Hwaseong won 1, Busan I'Park won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Hwaseong vs Busan I'Park?

Hwaseong score 1.18 goals per game on average and Busan I'Park 2.00. The K League 2 average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Hwaseong's matches and 73% of Busan I'Park's.

What form are Hwaseong and Busan I'Park in?

Over the last 5 games Hwaseong have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Busan I'Park 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hwaseong vs Busan I'Park?

The statistical background for Hwaseong vs Busan I'Park — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.