South Korea - K League 2Data current as of September 06, 2026

Hwaseong vs Gyeongnam: match statistics

Hwaseong crest
Hwaseong
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Gyeongnam crest
Gyeongnam

Hwaseong vs Gyeongnam: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Hwaseong played against Gyeongnam in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on May 31, 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Hwaseong has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Gyeongnam has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Hwaseong scores 1.46 goals per game and allows 1.15. Gyeongnam scores 1.25 and allows 1.58. Games in this league average 2.72 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 54% of Hwaseong's games and 67% of Gyeongnam's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 50%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Hwaseong has the higher season xG average, 1.43 to 1.17 per game. Hwaseong takes 11.3 shots per game, while Gyeongnam takes 9.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Hwaseong leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.92 goals per game after halftime. Gyeongnam leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.75 after halftime.

When the teams score

Hwaseong's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). For Gyeongnam, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

K League 2 games average 2.72 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win. Hwaseong sit 4th and have 4 wins and 1 draw in their last 5 matches, scoring 11 goals and averaging 2.6 points per match, while Gyeongnam (11th) over the same period have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 9 goals and 2.0 points per match. Hwaseong create clearly more chances — at home they average 5.11 shots on target and 12.89 shots overall per match versus 3 on target and 10.8 shots per match for the visitors, with a conversion rate of 12% compared to Gyeongnam’s 9%. Defensively the hosts are more stable: Hwaseong concede 1.11 goals per home match and keep a clean sheet in 44% of games, while Gyeongnam concede 1.4 goals away and have 0% clean sheets on the road. The differences in chance quality are confirmed by xG — Hwaseong’s average home xG is 1.58 versus 1.25 xG for Gyeongnam away; additionally the visitors fail to score in 40% of their away matches, while the hosts fail to score in only 11% of home games. Considering superior shot metrics, higher xG, lower share of matches without scoring and a better recent 5-game record, I assess probabilities at approximately 60% for the home side, 25% for a draw and 15% for the away side.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The scenario of both teams scoring is more likely: seasonally Hwaseong has BTTS 71%, Gyeongnam 60%, and the league average is 62%. In the last 5 matches both teams show BTTS 80%; in that period Hwaseong scored 11 and conceded 6 goals (averages 2.2 and 1.2), while Gyeongnam scored 9 and conceded 8 (1.8 and 1.6). xG indicates Hwaseong generates 1.1 xG and allows 1.2 xG, and Gyeongnam 1.25 xG and allows 1.31 xG, suggesting an exchange of chances at both ends. Additionally Gyeongnam has no clean sheets this season (0%), and Hwaseong only 14%, so the probability that either team fails to score is low. Considering the high seasonal and recent BTTS rates (71%/60% and 80%/80%), low CS (14%/0%) and xG ~1.1–1.31, I assess the chance of BTTS at 75% and recommend a 'Yes' (BTTS - Yes) bet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG model projects 1.21 expected goals for Hwaseong and 1.23 for Gyeongnam (total 2.44), calculated as the average of home attack xG 1.10 and away defense xG 1.31 and vice versa (1.25 and 1.20). With a combined λ=2.44 the Poisson distribution indicates roughly a 70% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), and seasonal Over 1.5 rates are 71% for the home side and 80% for the away side — therefore I assess Over 1.5 at 72%. Over 2.5 is more balanced: Poisson gives ≈44% for ≥3 goals, seasonal figures are 71% (Hwaseong) vs 20% (Gyeongnam), although in the last 5 matches both teams recorded Over 2.5 in 60% of games. Over 3.5 is unlikely (Poisson ≈23%), consistent with seasonal Over 3.5 of 43%/20%, hence Under 3.5 at 77% is justified. The best betting signal is Over 1.5 — expected total 2.44, high BTTS incidence 71%/60% and dominant seasonal Over1.5 rates (71%/80%) provide the strongest and most consistent argument.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

In the last 5 matches Hwaseong was level at half-time in 60% of cases (3 of 5) and leading in 40% (2 of 5), and never trailing at half-time (0%), which makes scenarios that start with the away side leading at the break unlikely. The home team are in better form — they have won 4 of their last 5 matches (80%) versus 3 of 5 for the visitors (60%) — and seasonally Hwaseong average 1.43 goals scored and 1.71 conceded, while Gyeongnam average 1.0 scored and 1.4 conceded. At half-time the hosts have averaged 1.0 goals in the last 5 matches versus 0.6 for the visitors, and although the visitors’ xG is 1.25 compared to the hosts’ 1.1, Hwaseong’s higher shot conversion rate (15% vs 9%) suggests the hosts convert chances into goals more often. On this basis the strongest signal is a half-time draw and home win at full-time (X/1) — I assign it 30%; very close is the 1/1 scenario with 28% because the hosts lead at the break in 40% of cases and have good finishing over the full match. I also allocate 15% to X/X (draw/draw) and 15% to X/2 (draw at HT and away win), while scenarios beginning with the away team leading are essentially marginal (2/* = 0%) given the hosts’ 0% rate of trailing at half-time in the last 5 matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

45Possession (%)55
HwaseongGyeongnam
17Shots9
HwaseongGyeongnam
5Shots on target5
HwaseongGyeongnam
1.75xG1.31
HwaseongGyeongnam
5Corners2
HwaseongGyeongnam
46Dangerous attacks53
HwaseongGyeongnam
17Fouls9
HwaseongGyeongnam
2Cards2
HwaseongGyeongnam

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

HwaseongGyeongnam
1.46Goals scored / game1.25
HwaseongGyeongnam
1.15Goals allowed / game1.58
HwaseongGyeongnam
48%Average possession47%
HwaseongGyeongnam
4.38Shots on target / game2.92
HwaseongGyeongnam

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.31Shots per game9.92
HwaseongGyeongnam
4.38Shots on target2.92
HwaseongGyeongnam
12.9%Shot conversion12.6%
HwaseongGyeongnam
48%Possession47%
HwaseongGyeongnam
1.43xG for1.17
HwaseongGyeongnam
1.36xG against1.25
HwaseongGyeongnam

Shooting quality

Hwaseong: BalancedGyeongnam: Counter-attacking
HwaseongGyeongnam
Accuracy (shots on target)39%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Hwaseong is 30% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / game - Hwaseong · 2 pts / game - Gyeongnam

Hwaseong
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
46% W31% R23% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-3
1.69 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-1
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Gyeongnam
WLWDW
Season result split
33% W25% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-5
1.25 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-2
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDWLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Hwaseong is 17% better for: goals scored per game.

1.46 goals / game - Hwaseong · 1.25 goals / game - Gyeongnam

Hwaseong is 37% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.15 goals / game - Hwaseong · 1.58 goals / game - Gyeongnam

Hwaseong scoring profile: very strong

Hwaseong scores in 77% of games (10 of 13 meczów), while Gyeongnam keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 meczów).

Gyeongnam scoring profile: strong

Gyeongnam scores in 75% of games (9 of 12 meczów), while Hwaseong keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 meczów).

19Goals scored (season)15
HwaseongGyeongnam
15Goals conceded (season)19
HwaseongGyeongnam
2.62Average goals per game2.83
HwaseongGyeongnam
11Goals scored (last 5)9
HwaseongGyeongnam
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
HwaseongGyeongnam

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal75%
HwaseongGyeongnam
54%2 goals33%
HwaseongGyeongnam
15%3 goals17%
HwaseongGyeongnam
0%4 goals0%
HwaseongGyeongnam

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal92%
HwaseongGyeongnam
38%2 goals50%
HwaseongGyeongnam
8%3 goals8%
HwaseongGyeongnam
0%4 goals8%
HwaseongGyeongnam

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time33%
HwaseongGyeongnam
8%BTTS in both halves0%
HwaseongGyeongnam
31%Scored in both halves33%
HwaseongGyeongnam

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
HwaseongGyeongnam
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
HwaseongGyeongnam
80%BTTS - last 580%
HwaseongGyeongnam

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
HwaseongGyeongnam
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
HwaseongGyeongnam
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
HwaseongGyeongnam

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
HwaseongGyeongnam
46%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
HwaseongGyeongnam
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
HwaseongGyeongnam

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Hwaseong is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.23 pts / game - Hwaseong · 0.92 pts / game - Gyeongnam

Hwaseong - half-time state
31% leading31% draw38% trailing
Gyeongnam - half-time state
17% leading42% draw42% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.23Points per game (1st half)0.92
HwaseongGyeongnam
0.54Goals scored (1st half)0.5
HwaseongGyeongnam
0.69Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
HwaseongGyeongnam
1.23Average goals (1st half)1.33
HwaseongGyeongnam
46%Clean sheet before half-time50%
HwaseongGyeongnam
54%No goal before half-time50%
HwaseongGyeongnam

After half-time (2nd half)

1.85Points per game (2nd half)1.17
HwaseongGyeongnam
0.92Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
HwaseongGyeongnam
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
HwaseongGyeongnam
1.38Average goals (2nd half)1.5
HwaseongGyeongnam
54%Clean sheet after half-time50%
HwaseongGyeongnam
38%No goal after half-time42%
HwaseongGyeongnam

Hwaseong - second-half results

46% W46% R8% P
16
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding148%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Gyeongnam - second-half results

25% W42% R33% P
11
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.92
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Hwaseong - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.802.00
Goals scored / game1.01.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.61.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Gyeongnam - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.60
Goals scored / game0.61.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.42.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Hwaseong
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
4
3
16-30
2
4
31-45
5
1
46-60
3
1
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Gyeongnam
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
8
31-45
1
2
46-60
2
3
61-75
6
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.72
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-51%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Hwaseong

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.91
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Gyeongnam

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.75
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

HwaseongLigaGyeongnam
Average goals per game 2.622.72 2.83
Both teams scored 54%62% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%56% 50%
Clean sheets 31%24% 8%
Goal before half-time 85%73% 67%
Goal after half-time 69%74% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / game
1.34
Away goals / game
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defensive advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. GyeongnamYellow cardChigozie Emmanuel Mbah
  2. HwaseongGoalKyung-Min ParkAssist: Leonard Pllana
  3. HwaseongYellow cardKyung-Min Park
  4. GyeongnamYellow cardHo-Jun Son
  5. HwaseongSubstitutionOn: Sava PetrovOff: Byung-Oh Kim
  6. HwaseongYellow cardDae-Hwan Kim
  7. HwaseongSubstitutionOn: Sun-Woo HamOff: Dae-Hwan Kim

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Hwaseong's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss against Gyeongnam. Games average 1.33 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.

Hwaseong FC
0 : 1
Gyeongnam FC
Gyeongnam FC
0 : 1
Hwaseong FC
Hwaseong FC
1 : 1
Gyeongnam FC

FAQ

What was the result of Hwaseong vs Gyeongnam?

The K League 2 match finished Hwaseong 2:0 Gyeongnam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Hwaseong and Gyeongnam?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Hwaseong won 1, Gyeongnam won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Hwaseong vs Gyeongnam?

Hwaseong score 1.46 goals per game on average and Gyeongnam 1.25. The K League 2 average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Hwaseong's matches and 67% of Gyeongnam's.

What form are Hwaseong and Gyeongnam in?

Over the last 5 games Hwaseong have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Gyeongnam 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hwaseong vs Gyeongnam?

The statistical background for Hwaseong vs Gyeongnam — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.