Hwaseong vs Paju Citizen: match statistics
Hwaseong vs Paju Citizen: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Hwaseong played against Paju Citizen in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on July 11, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Hwaseong has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Paju Citizen has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Hwaseong scores 1.47 goals per game and allows 1.13. Paju Citizen scores 1.00 and allows 1.40. Games in this league average 2.78 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 53% of Hwaseong's games and 47% of Paju Citizen's. The Over 2.5 rates are 47% and 47%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Hwaseong has the higher season xG average, 1.43 to 1.28 per game. Hwaseong takes 11.5 shots per game, while Paju Citizen takes 10.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Hwaseong leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 0.87 goals per game after halftime. Paju Citizen leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.40 after halftime.
When the teams score
Hwaseong's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For Paju Citizen, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 2 games average 2.78 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Hwaseong holds a clear advantage in form and attack: in the last 5 matches they have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (10 points, PPG 2.0) and have scored 10 goals, whereas Paju in their last 5 have 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses (PPG 0.2) with only 1 goal scored. At home Hwaseong averages 1.55 goals, 12.82 shots and 4.91 shots on target per match with a 12% conversion rate, while Paju away averages 1.00 goal, 11.71 shots and 4.0 shots on target with only 9% conversion and 29% of matches without a goal. Additionally, hosts concede 1.09 goals at home with opposing xG 1.38, whereas Paju concede 1.57 goals away with opposing xG 1.74, suggesting greater vulnerability of the visitors to conceding. The positional gap (6 vs 13), season goal difference 22:15 and higher clean sheet rate for the hosts (45% vs 29%) confirm Hwaseong’s superiority. Based on this I project a home win probability of ~65%, draw 20% and Paju win 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The analysis favors BTTS - Yes. The league has a high BTTS rate of 63% and Paju’s season BTTS is 57% versus Hwaseong’s 38%. Hwaseong compensates with current form — BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches and an average of 2.0 goals scored, while Paju has 20% BTTS and only 0.2 goals in that period. Both teams have very similar recent xG: Hwaseong 1.48 xG vs Paju 1.46 xG, and both concede on average 1.4 goals over the last 5 matches, which increases the likelihood of both teams scoring. Paju creates more chances (11.7 shots and 4.0 on target per match vs 8.5 and 3.0 for Hwaseong), and the low clean sheet percentages (25% and 29%) together with season averages of goals conceded (1.25 and 1.57) support the scenario that both teams can score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model projects 1.41 xG for Hwaseong and 1.42 xG for Paju, totaling 2.83 expected goals for the match. With λ=2.83 the Poisson distribution implies ~77% probability of Over 1.5 goals, ~54% for Over 2.5 and ~32% for Over 3.5, so the strongest signal is for Over 1.5. Shot statistics support an attacking profile: Paju averages 11.71 shots (4.0 on target) and Hwaseong 8.5 (3.0 on target), with conversion rates of 12% for Hwaseong and 9% for Paju. Season rates for Over 2.5 are 57% for Paju and 38% for Hwaseong; BTTS is 57% for Paju and 38% for Hwaseong; in the last 5 matches Hwaseong scored 10 goals (2.0 avg) versus Paju’s 1 goal (0.2). Given the expected 2.83 goals—slightly above the league average of 2.78—and the shot and xG concentration, I recommend backing Over at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is Hwaseong leading at Half-Time and ultimately winning the match (1/1) — I assign this a 48% probability. In their last five matches Hwaseong led at the break in 60% of games (3 of 5) and scored a total of 9 first-half goals (1.8 on average), while Paju Citizen scored only 1 first-half goal in those five matches (0.2 on average). Seasonally the home side have kept a clean sheet at Half-Time in 75% of matches, and the visitors concede an average of 0.71 goals by the break, which increases the likelihood Hwaseong will hold the lead after 45 minutes. For Full-Time the form and recent record favor the hosts — Hwaseong have won 60% of their last five fixtures, while Paju have not won any of their last five (0%) — therefore the scenario where the match is level at Half-Time but the hosts turn it around to win (X/1) is my second most likely outcome (20%). Although Paju register a higher average xG (1.52 versus the home side’s 1.07), their weak Half-Time performance and overall inefficiency in recent games make a visitor turnaround unlikely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Hwaseong | Paju Citizen | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Hwaseong is 900% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Hwaseong · 0.2 pts / game - Paju Citizen
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Hwaseong is 47% better for: goals scored per game.
1.47 goals / game - Hwaseong · 1 goals / game - Paju Citizen
Hwaseong is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.13 goals / game - Hwaseong · 1.4 goals / game - Paju Citizen
Hwaseong scores in 80% of games (12 of 15 meczów), while Paju Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 meczów).
Paju Citizen scores in 60% of games (9 of 15 meczów), while Hwaseong keeps a clean sheet in 33% (5 of 15 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Hwaseong
Over / Under - Paju Citizen
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hwaseong is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / game - Hwaseong · 1.4 pts / game - Paju Citizen
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Hwaseong - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 47%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Paju Citizen - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Hwaseong
Paju Citizen
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Hwaseong | Liga | Paju Citizen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.60 | 2.78 | ▼ 2.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 53% | 62% | ▼ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 57% | ▼ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 23% | ▲ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 87% | 72% | ▼ 53% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 76% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Other recorded players
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Hwaseong vs Paju Citizen?
The K League 2 match finished Hwaseong 1:2 Paju Citizen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Hwaseong vs Paju Citizen?
Hwaseong score 1.47 goals per game on average and Paju Citizen 1.00. The K League 2 average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Hwaseong's matches and 47% of Paju Citizen's.
What form are Hwaseong and Paju Citizen in?
Over the last 5 games Hwaseong have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Paju Citizen 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Hwaseong vs Paju Citizen?
The statistical background for Hwaseong vs Paju Citizen — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


