Myanmar (Burma) - National LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

I.S.P.E vs Shan United: match statistics

I.S.P.E crest
I.S.P.E
1 : 6half-time 0:3
Shan United crest
Shan United
120%(7.75)
X20%(5.52)
260%(1.25)

Shan United is the clear favorite in this clash, occupying first place in the table with an impressive record of 13 wins, 4 draws, and no defeats. The visiting team presents phenomenal away form with an 89% win rate and a streak of eight matches without a loss on the road. The difference in quality between the two teams is distinct – Shan United scores an average of 3 goals per away match, conceding just 0.56, while I.S.P.E. is in weaker form with only one victory in the last five matches and a negative goal difference during this period (5 scored, 14 conceded). The advantage in ball possession (56% vs 47%), higher shot accuracy (23% vs 16%), and dominant form in the last five games (2.6 points per match vs 0.8) further argue for an away win. Although I.S.P.E. has a decent home record (56% wins), the gap in class between the teams is too great for the hosts to realistically threaten the league leaders.

I.S.P.E vs Shan United: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

I.S.P.E play Shan United in National League (Myanmar (Burma)). The match date is 25 February 2026 at 11:00. Final score: 1:6.

Current form

I.S.P.E: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Shan United: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

I.S.P.E scores 1.67 and concedes 2.05 goals per match. Shan United scores 3.00 and concedes 0.45. League average: 3.56 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: I.S.P.E 76%, Shan United 36%. Over 2.5: I.S.P.E 81%, Shan United 73%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 69%.

xG, shots and style

Shan United has higher xG: 1.81 vs 1.53. I.S.P.E: 10.4 shots per match, Shan United: 11.6.

Match halves

I.S.P.E: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.05. Shan United: half-time lead 77%, second-half goals 1.73.

Goals by minute

I.S.P.E: 76-90+ (12 goals). Shan United: 76-90+ (19 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

National League: 3.56 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 69%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Shan United is the clear favorite in this clash, occupying first place in the table with an impressive record of 13 wins, 4 draws, and no defeats. The visiting team presents phenomenal away form with an 89% win rate and a streak of eight matches without a loss on the road. The difference in quality between the two teams is distinct – Shan United scores an average of 3 goals per away match, conceding just 0.56, while I.S.P.E. is in weaker form with only one victory in the last five matches and a negative goal difference during this period (5 scored, 14 conceded). The advantage in ball possession (56% vs 47%), higher shot accuracy (23% vs 16%), and dominant form in the last five games (2.6 points per match vs 0.8) further argue for an away win. Although I.S.P.E. has a decent home record (56% wins), the gap in class between the teams is too great for the hosts to realistically threaten the league leaders.

Half-by-half

0 : 3
1st half
1 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

33Possession (%)67
I.S.P.EShan United
4Shots14
I.S.P.EShan United
2Shots on target9
I.S.P.EShan United
0.71xG2.18
I.S.P.EShan United
1Corners4
I.S.P.EShan United
42Dangerous attacks90
I.S.P.EShan United
-1Fouls-1
I.S.P.EShan United
-1Cards-1
I.S.P.EShan United

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

I.S.P.EShan United
1.67Goals scored / match3
I.S.P.EShan United
2.05Goals conceded / match0.45
I.S.P.EShan United
43%Average possession52%
I.S.P.EShan United
5.52Shots on target / match6.32
I.S.P.EShan United

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.43Shots per match11.64
I.S.P.EShan United
5.52Shots on target6.32
I.S.P.EShan United
16%Shot conversion25.8%
I.S.P.EShan United
43%Possession52%
I.S.P.EShan United
1.53xG for1.81
I.S.P.EShan United
1.6xG against0.86
I.S.P.EShan United

Shooting quality

I.S.P.E: Counter-attackingShan United: Efficient finishing
I.S.P.EShan United
Accuracy (shots on target)53%54%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.47

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Shan United is 67% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - I.S.P.E · 3 pts / match - Shan United

I.S.P.E
WLLWW
Season result split
43% W19% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-4-8
1.48 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-3-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.93Opponent xG: 1.35BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Shan United
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
82% W18% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
18-4-0
2.64 pts / match · goal difference +56
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
10-1-0
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 4.0Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.96Opponent xG: 0.74BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Shan United is 80% better for: goals scored per match.

1.67 goals / match - I.S.P.E · 3 goals / match - Shan United

Shan United is 356% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.05 goals / match - I.S.P.E · 0.45 goals / match - Shan United

I.S.P.E scoring profile: strong

I.S.P.E scores in 90% of matches (19 of 21 matches), while Shan United keeps a clean sheet in 64% (14 of 22 matches).

Shan United scoring profile: very strong

Shan United scores in 82% of matches (18 of 22 matches), while I.S.P.E keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 matches).

35Goals scored (season)66
I.S.P.EShan United
43Goals conceded (season)10
I.S.P.EShan United
3.71Average goals in match3.45
I.S.P.EShan United
8Goals scored (last 5)20
I.S.P.EShan United
11Goals conceded (last 5)2
I.S.P.EShan United

How often they score at least...

90%1 goal82%
I.S.P.EShan United
43%2 goals77%
I.S.P.EShan United
19%3 goals68%
I.S.P.EShan United
10%4 goals41%
I.S.P.EShan United

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal36%
I.S.P.EShan United
57%2 goals9%
I.S.P.EShan United
29%3 goals0%
I.S.P.EShan United
19%4 goals0%
I.S.P.EShan United

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time14%
I.S.P.EShan United
10%BTTS in both halves9%
I.S.P.EShan United
33%Scored in both halves68%
I.S.P.EShan United

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
I.S.P.EShan United
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS36%
I.S.P.EShan United
100%BTTS - last 540%
I.S.P.EShan United

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
I.S.P.EShan United
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
I.S.P.EShan United
10%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
I.S.P.EShan United

2nd half

95%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
I.S.P.EShan United
86%Min. 2 goals after half-time68%
I.S.P.EShan United
38%Min. 3 goals after half-time45%
I.S.P.EShan United

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Shan United is 85% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - I.S.P.E · 2.55 pts / match - Shan United

I.S.P.E - half-time state
38% leading24% draw38% trailing
Shan United - half-time state
77% leading23% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)2.55
I.S.P.EShan United
0.62Goals scored (1st half)1.27
I.S.P.EShan United
0.76Goals conceded (1st half)0.14
I.S.P.EShan United
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.41
I.S.P.EShan United
48%Clean sheet before half-time86%
I.S.P.EShan United
52%No goal before half-time23%
I.S.P.EShan United

After half-time (2nd half)

1.24Points per match (2nd half)2.18
I.S.P.EShan United
1.05Goals scored (2nd half)1.73
I.S.P.EShan United
1.29Goals conceded (2nd half)0.32
I.S.P.EShan United
2.33Average goals (2nd half)2.05
I.S.P.EShan United
24%Clean sheet after half-time68%
I.S.P.EShan United
24%No goal after half-time27%
I.S.P.EShan United

I.S.P.E - second-half results

29% W38% R33% P
29
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding113%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Shan United - second-half results

59% W41% R0% P
56
Half-time points
28
Half-time goals
+25
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
+31
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding106%

Leads at half-time in 77% of matches and wins 82%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

I.S.P.E - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match0.21.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.22.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%0%
Goal difference-4+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Shan United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.002.20
Goals scored / match1.62.4
Goals conceded / match0.00.4
Average goals in match1.62.8
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal0%20%
Goal difference+8+10
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 8

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

I.S.P.E
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
1
5
16-30
10
7
31-45
3
6
46-60
7
6
61-75
12
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Shan United
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
12
1
16-30
11
1
31-45
11
1
46-60
8
2
61-75
19
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (19 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +15 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 2.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
74%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

I.S.P.E

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
34% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
34%

Shan United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.95
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
167%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
26%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (National League).

Teams vs league

I.S.P.ELigaShan United
Average goals in match 3.713.56 3.45
Both teams scored 76%55% 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 81%69% 73%
Clean sheets 14%27% 64%
Goal before half-time 86%78% 77%
Goal after half-time 95%77% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.56
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.76
Home goals / match
1.80
Away goals / match
+-2%
Home attack advantage
+-2%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
57%
2 goals
31%
3 goals
16%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: I.S.P.E 0 - 0 - 1 Shan United. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of I.S.P.E vs Shan United?

The National League match finished I.S.P.E 1:6 Shan United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before I.S.P.E vs Shan United?

I.S.P.E score 1.67 goals per game on average and Shan United 3.00. The National League average is 3.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 76% of I.S.P.E's matches and 36% of Shan United's.

What form are I.S.P.E and Shan United in?

Over the last 5 games I.S.P.E have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Shan United 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for I.S.P.E vs Shan United?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.