ÍA vs Breidablik: match statistics
ÍA vs Breidablik: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
ÍA played against Breidablik in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The game was played on July 4, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
ÍA has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Breidablik has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
ÍA scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 1.92. Breidablik scores 2.50 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 4.08 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 58% of ÍA's games and 75% of Breidablik's. The Over 2.5 rates are 58% and 75%, compared with league averages of 74% for BTTS and 73% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Breidablik has the higher season xG average, 1.75 to 1.67 per game. ÍA takes 14.2 shots per game, while Breidablik takes 15.0.
First-half and second-half trends
ÍA leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.92 goals per game after halftime. Breidablik leads at halftime in 50% and scores 1.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
ÍA's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). For Breidablik, it is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Úrvalsdeild games average 4.08 goals. Both teams score in 74% of games, and 73% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Breidablik is the favorite (2): over the season they have scored 30 goals versus ÍA’s 16, and in the last 5 matches the visitors have scored 14 times (2.8 per game) compared to the hosts’ 6 goals (1.2 per game). Despite a similar xG — ÍA has 1.66 xG at home and Breidablik 1.63 xG away — and comparable shot numbers (14 vs 13.83) and shots on target (4.6 vs 4.33), the visitors convert their chances far better (conversion rate 14% vs 7%). The favorites’ defense is, however, vulnerable: Breidablik concedes 2.17 goals on average away, while ÍA concedes 1.6 at home, and both teams have conceded 9 goals in the last 5 fixtures, pointing to an open game. In form by points the visitors look stronger — averaging 2.0 points per game in the last 5 matches versus ÍA’s 1.2 — and the table also favors them (4th vs 7th). Considering higher shot efficiency, greater goals scored and better recent point form, I predict a Breidablik win, although with weak defenses on both sides I expect an exchange of goals.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes as the most likely outcome. The league shows a high BTTS rate of 74%, with ÍA recording BTTS in 67% of their matches this season and Breidablik in 83%, providing a strong signal for both teams to score. Both sides score and concede heavily: ÍA average 3.0 goals for and 1.83 against, Breidablik 2.0 goals for and 2.17 against, yielding roughly 5.0 goals per game between these teams. xG supports chances created and defensive vulnerability — ÍA xG_for 1.88 vs xG_against 1.73, Breidablik xG_for 1.63 vs xG_against 2.0 — and Over 2.5 occurs in 83% of ÍA matches and 67% of Breidablik matches. Although ÍA’s BTTS rate has fallen to 40% in their last 5 games (60% for away fixtures), based on the seasonal 67%/83% figures and the league 74% baseline I estimate an 80% probability for 'yes' and 20% for 'no'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model gives 1.94 expected goals for ÍA and 1.68 for Breidablik, totaling 3.62 (calculated as the average of attack xG and opponent defensive xG: 1.88+2.00 for the home side; 1.63+1.73 for the away side). Season figures confirm an offensive profile: ÍA scores 3.0 goals per game on average, Breidablik 2.0, and both teams have 83% of matches over 1.5 goals. Additionally, the league averages 4.08 goals per game, and the percentage of matches with both teams scoring is 74% (67% for ÍA and 83% for Breidablik), which favors a high-scoring game. Using a Poisson distribution with a total of 3.62 yields P(over 1.5) ≈88%, P(over 2.5) ≈70% and P(over 3.5) ≈49%, indicating the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Considering the combined xG, the high share of matches >1.5 (83%) and frequent BTTS occurrences, I recommend betting Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is 1/1 (home team leading at half-time and winning), because the home side led at the break in 4 matches (67%) and win 67% of home fixtures. At half-time the hosts score on average 1.33 goals and concede only 0.5 (scoredAVGHT_home 1.33, concededAVGHT_home 0.5), which indicates control of the first half. Their xG of 1.88 versus the visitors’ xG of 1.63, 6.0 shots on target versus 4.33 and a conversion rate of 19% versus the visitors’ 14% further support holding the lead. However, it should be noted that the away team has a high BTTS percentage of 83% and have scored after the break in their last 5 games (last 5 matches with >0.5 goals in the 2nd half for the visitors: 100%), so I retained meaningful probability weight for equalising scenarios. As a result the distribution favors 1/1 (42%) with cushions for 1/X (16%) and X/1 (10%), but it also accounts for the risk of second-half goals and unexpected turnarounds.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| ÍA | Breidablik | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.48 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Breidablik is 88% better for: goals scored per game.
1.33 goals / game - ÍA · 2.5 goals / game - Breidablik
ÍA scores in 75% of games (9 of 12 meczów), while Breidablik keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 meczów).
Breidablik scores in 92% of games (11 of 12 meczów), while ÍA keeps a clean sheet in 17% (2 of 12 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - ÍA
Over / Under - Breidablik
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Breidablik is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / game - ÍA · 1.75 pts / game - Breidablik
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
ÍA - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Breidablik - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 42%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 3.2 | 3.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 100% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
ÍA
Breidablik
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| ÍA | Liga | Breidablik | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.25 | 4.08 | ▲ 4.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 58% | 74% | • 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 58% | 73% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 17% | 14% | ▲ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 86% | ▼ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 87% | ▼ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from ÍA's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Breidablik. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of ÍA vs Breidablik?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished ÍA 1:2 Breidablik. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between ÍA and Breidablik?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches ÍA won 2, Breidablik won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before ÍA vs Breidablik?
ÍA score 1.33 goals per game on average and Breidablik 2.50. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 58% of ÍA's matches and 75% of Breidablik's.
What form are ÍA and Breidablik in?
Over the last 5 games ÍA have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Breidablik 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ÍA vs Breidablik?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for ÍA vs Breidablik: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


