ÍBV vs Fram: match statistics
ÍBV vs Fram: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
ÍBV played against Fram in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The game was played on August 1, 2026. Venue: Hásteinsvöllur. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
ÍBV has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Fram has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
ÍBV scores 1.63 goals per game and allows 2.13. Fram scores 2.56 and allows 1.75. Games in this league average 3.97 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 75% of ÍBV's games and 69% of Fram's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 69%, compared with league averages of 72% for BTTS and 71% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Fram has the higher season xG average, 2.02 to 1.35 per game. ÍBV takes 11.6 shots per game, while Fram takes 17.7.
First-half and second-half trends
ÍBV leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.94 goals per game after halftime. Fram leads at halftime in 44% and scores 1.31 after halftime.
When the teams score
ÍBV's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Fram, it is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Úrvalsdeild games average 3.97 goals. Both teams score in 72% of games, and 71% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Fram is the clear favorite: they sit 3rd (10 wins, 4 draws, 2 losses) vs ÍBV in 8th (4 wins, 4 draws, 8 losses). In attack Fram has scored 41 goals this season and 12 in the last 5 matches with an average xG of 1.99 per game, while ÍBV has 26 goals this season and 6 in the last 5 with a home xG of 1.37. Fram averages 17.88 shots and 5.63 on target away, keep 25% clean sheets and concede 1.5 goals on average away, whereas ÍBV at home averages 11.63 shots and 4.63 on target, have only 13% clean sheets and concede 1.88 goals. ÍBV have a higher home conversion rate (16% vs 12%), which gives them a chance with limited opportunities, but the xG gap (1.99 vs 1.37) and shot volume (17.88 vs 11.63) favor Fram. Considering Fram’s unbeaten run in the last 5 (3 wins, 2 draws, PPG 2.2 vs ÍBV’s 1.0) and the advantage in goals and expected chances, I predict an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show a strong seasonal signal for BTTS: ÍBV records BTTS in 75% of matches, Fram in 63%, while the league BTTS level is 72%, indicating a tendency for both sides to score and concede. This season ÍBV averages 3.0 goals scored and 2.0 conceded per match, whereas Fram scores 2.13 and concedes 1.5; additionally, in the last 5 matches Fram has averaged 2.4 goals scored and only 0.8 conceded, while ÍBV averages 1.2 scored and 1.8 conceded. xG confirms offensive balance: xG_for 2.05 for ÍBV vs 1.99 for Fram and xG_against 1.55 vs 1.39, and average shots on target 6.38 vs 5.63 show both teams create chances, increasing the likelihood of Goal/Goal. Furthermore 88% of ÍBV’s matches are over 2.5 goals versus 50% for Fram, and clean sheet expected rates are only 13% for ÍBV and 25% for Fram, which limits the chance of No Goal. In light of these figures (75% vs 63% seasonal BTTS, league 72% and aggressive goal stats) I tip BTTS - Yes as the strongest signal and assess the probability of BTTS at 75% with 25% for No BTTS.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects 1.72 expected goals for ÍBV and 1.77 for Fram, totaling 3.49 goals per match. Seasonal averages are 3.0 goals scored by ÍBV and 2.13 by Fram, with goals conceded on average 2.0 (ÍBV) and 1.5 (Fram); in the last 5 matches the home side averaged 1.2 goals and the visitors 2.4, confirming the offensive nature of the fixture. 88% of ÍBV’s matches finish over 2.5 goals, Fram has 50% such matches, and the league sits at 71% over 2.5; both teams also register high BTTS rates: 75% (ÍBV) and 63% (Fram). Offensive metrics support this: average shots on target 6.38 (ÍBV) vs 5.63 (Fram), and conversion rates 17% vs 12%, which increases goal probability. Based on this, the strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5 (I back the Over at the 1.5 line), Over 2.5 remains valuable (~78%), while Over 3.5 is riskier despite the hosts’ high seasonal share (approx. 62%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is Fram leading at half-time and winning the match (2/2): in the last 5 fixtures Fram led at the break in 60% of cases (3 of 5) and averaged 1.4 goals by half-time in those five games, while ÍBV averaged only 0.2. Fram’s form in the last 5 rounds is W D W W D, with a 60% win rate and an average of 2.4 goals scored per match and only 0.8 conceded, demonstrating strong attacking efficiency recently. ÍBV’s season home numbers are 3.0 goals scored and 2.0 conceded on average, and they register 1.25 goals by half-time versus 0.75 conceded seasonally; however, in their last 5 home matches the hosts had 0% leads at the break, which weakens their first-half position. The league is offensive (average goals 3.97) and both teams often score (BTTS: ÍBV 75%, Fram 63%), so I expect goals and Fram to maintain or extend their lead after the break; I estimate 2/2 at around a 28% probability and X/2 at around 20%, hence the selection of '2/2' as the main pick.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| ÍBV | Fram | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Fram is 120% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - ÍBV · 2.2 pts / game - Fram
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Fram is 57% better for: goals scored per game.
1.63 goals / game - ÍBV · 2.56 goals / game - Fram
Fram is 22% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.13 goals / game - ÍBV · 1.75 goals / game - Fram
ÍBV scores in 81% of games (13 of 16 games), while Fram keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 games).
Fram scores in 81% of games (13 of 16 games), while ÍBV keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 16 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - ÍBV
Over / Under - Fram
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Fram is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / game - ÍBV · 1.75 pts / game - Fram
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
ÍBV - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Fram - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 63%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
ÍBV
Fram
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).
Teams vs league
| ÍBV | Liga | Fram | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.75 | 3.97 | ▲ 4.31 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 72% | ▼ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 63% | 71% | ▼ 69% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 6% | 16% | ▲ 19% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 75% | 80% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 94% | 86% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from ÍBV's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses against Fram. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of ÍBV vs Fram?
The Úrvalsdeild match finished ÍBV 1:2 Fram. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between ÍBV and Fram?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches ÍBV won 1, Fram won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before ÍBV vs Fram?
ÍBV score 1.63 goals per game on average and Fram 2.56. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 75% of ÍBV's matches and 69% of Fram's.
What form are ÍBV and Fram in?
Over the last 5 games ÍBV have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Fram 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ÍBV vs Fram?
The statistical background for ÍBV vs Fram — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.