Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildHásteinsvöllurData current as of 04 August 2026

ÍBV vs Fram: match statistics

ÍBV crest
ÍBV
1 : 2half-time 0:2
Fram crest
Fram

ÍBV vs Fram: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

ÍBV played Fram in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match was played on 1 August 2026. Venue: Hásteinsvöllur. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

ÍBV: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Fram: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

ÍBV scores 1.63 and concedes 2.13 goals per match. Fram scores 2.56 and concedes 1.75. League average: 3.97 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: ÍBV 75%, Fram 69%. Over 2.5: ÍBV 63%, Fram 69%. League level: BTTS 72%, Over 2.5 71%.

xG, shots and style

Fram has higher xG: 2.02 vs 1.35. ÍBV: 11.6 shots per match, Fram: 17.7.

Match halves

ÍBV: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.94. Fram: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.31.

Goals by minute

ÍBV: 76-90+ (6 goals). Fram: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Úrvalsdeild: 3.97 goals per match, BTTS 72%, Over 2.5 71%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-2. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Fram is the clear favorite: they sit 3rd (10 wins, 4 draws, 2 losses) vs ÍBV in 8th (4 wins, 4 draws, 8 losses). In attack Fram has scored 41 goals this season and 12 in the last 5 matches with an average xG of 1.99 per game, while ÍBV has 26 goals this season and 6 in the last 5 with a home xG of 1.37. Fram averages 17.88 shots and 5.63 on target away, keep 25% clean sheets and concede 1.5 goals on average away, whereas ÍBV at home averages 11.63 shots and 4.63 on target, have only 13% clean sheets and concede 1.88 goals. ÍBV have a higher home conversion rate (16% vs 12%), which gives them a chance with limited opportunities, but the xG gap (1.99 vs 1.37) and shot volume (17.88 vs 11.63) favor Fram. Considering Fram’s unbeaten run in the last 5 (3 wins, 2 draws, PPG 2.2 vs ÍBV’s 1.0) and the advantage in goals and expected chances, I predict an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams show a strong seasonal signal for BTTS: ÍBV records BTTS in 75% of matches, Fram in 63%, while the league BTTS level is 72%, indicating a tendency for both sides to score and concede. This season ÍBV averages 3.0 goals scored and 2.0 conceded per match, whereas Fram scores 2.13 and concedes 1.5; additionally, in the last 5 matches Fram has averaged 2.4 goals scored and only 0.8 conceded, while ÍBV averages 1.2 scored and 1.8 conceded. xG confirms offensive balance: xG_for 2.05 for ÍBV vs 1.99 for Fram and xG_against 1.55 vs 1.39, and average shots on target 6.38 vs 5.63 show both teams create chances, increasing the likelihood of Goal/Goal. Furthermore 88% of ÍBV’s matches are over 2.5 goals versus 50% for Fram, and clean sheet expected rates are only 13% for ÍBV and 25% for Fram, which limits the chance of No Goal. In light of these figures (75% vs 63% seasonal BTTS, league 72% and aggressive goal stats) I tip BTTS - Yes as the strongest signal and assess the probability of BTTS at 75% with 25% for No BTTS.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model projects 1.72 expected goals for ÍBV and 1.77 for Fram, totaling 3.49 goals per match. Seasonal averages are 3.0 goals scored by ÍBV and 2.13 by Fram, with goals conceded on average 2.0 (ÍBV) and 1.5 (Fram); in the last 5 matches the home side averaged 1.2 goals and the visitors 2.4, confirming the offensive nature of the fixture. 88% of ÍBV’s matches finish over 2.5 goals, Fram has 50% such matches, and the league sits at 71% over 2.5; both teams also register high BTTS rates: 75% (ÍBV) and 63% (Fram). Offensive metrics support this: average shots on target 6.38 (ÍBV) vs 5.63 (Fram), and conversion rates 17% vs 12%, which increases goal probability. Based on this, the strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5 (I back the Over at the 1.5 line), Over 2.5 remains valuable (~78%), while Over 3.5 is riskier despite the hosts’ high seasonal share (approx. 62%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is Fram leading at half-time and winning the match (2/2): in the last 5 fixtures Fram led at the break in 60% of cases (3 of 5) and averaged 1.4 goals by half-time in those five games, while ÍBV averaged only 0.2. Fram’s form in the last 5 rounds is W D W W D, with a 60% win rate and an average of 2.4 goals scored per match and only 0.8 conceded, demonstrating strong attacking efficiency recently. ÍBV’s season home numbers are 3.0 goals scored and 2.0 conceded on average, and they register 1.25 goals by half-time versus 0.75 conceded seasonally; however, in their last 5 home matches the hosts had 0% leads at the break, which weakens their first-half position. The league is offensive (average goals 3.97) and both teams often score (BTTS: ÍBV 75%, Fram 63%), so I expect goals and Fram to maintain or extend their lead after the break; I estimate 2/2 at around a 28% probability and X/2 at around 20%, hence the selection of '2/2' as the main pick.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
ÍBVFram
12Shots11
ÍBVFram
1Shots on target2
ÍBVFram
1.15xG1.11
ÍBVFram
4Corners3
ÍBVFram
44Dangerous attacks38
ÍBVFram
15Fouls25
ÍBVFram
4Cards6
ÍBVFram

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.63Goals scored / match2.56
ÍBVFram
2.13Goals conceded / match1.75
ÍBVFram
48%Average possession47%
ÍBVFram
4.06Shots on target / match6
ÍBVFram

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.63Shots per match17.69
ÍBVFram
4.06Shots on target6
ÍBVFram
14%Shot conversion14.5%
ÍBVFram
48%Possession47%
ÍBVFram
1.35xG for2.02
ÍBVFram
1.55xG against1.47
ÍBVFram

Shooting quality

ÍBV: Efficient finishingFram: Counter-attacking
ÍBVFram
Accuracy (shots on target)35%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Fram is 120% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - ÍBV · 2.2 pts / match - Fram

ÍBV
DWLDL
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-8
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Fram
WDWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
63% W25% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-4-2
2.13 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.04Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Fram is 57% better for: goals scored per match.

1.63 goals / match - ÍBV · 2.56 goals / match - Fram

Fram is 22% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.13 goals / match - ÍBV · 1.75 goals / match - Fram

ÍBV scoring profile: very strong

ÍBV scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Fram keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).

Fram scoring profile: very strong

Fram scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while ÍBV keeps a clean sheet in 6% (1 of 16 matches).

26Goals scored (season)41
ÍBVFram
34Goals conceded (season)28
ÍBVFram
3.75Average goals in match4.31
ÍBVFram
6Goals scored (last 5)12
ÍBVFram
9Goals conceded (last 5)4
ÍBVFram

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal81%
ÍBVFram
44%2 goals69%
ÍBVFram
13%3 goals56%
ÍBVFram
13%4 goals31%
ÍBVFram

How often they concede at least...

94%1 goal81%
ÍBVFram
56%2 goals50%
ÍBVFram
19%3 goals31%
ÍBVFram
19%4 goals6%
ÍBVFram

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time44%
ÍBVFram
6%BTTS in both halves19%
ÍBVFram
19%Scored in both halves50%
ÍBVFram

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS63%
ÍBVFram
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
ÍBVFram
60%BTTS - last 560%
ÍBVFram

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
ÍBVFram
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time63%
ÍBVFram
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time38%
ÍBVFram

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
ÍBVFram
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
ÍBVFram
38%Min. 3 goals after half-time44%
ÍBVFram

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Fram is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - ÍBV · 1.75 pts / match - Fram

ÍBV - half-time state
25% leading38% draw38% trailing
Fram - half-time state
44% leading44% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)1.75
ÍBVFram
0.69Goals scored (1st half)1.25
ÍBVFram
0.88Goals conceded (1st half)0.81
ÍBVFram
1.56Average goals (1st half)2.06
ÍBVFram
44%Clean sheet before half-time50%
ÍBVFram
56%No goal before half-time38%
ÍBVFram

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)1.5
ÍBVFram
0.94Goals scored (2nd half)1.31
ÍBVFram
1.25Goals conceded (2nd half)0.94
ÍBVFram
2.19Average goals (2nd half)2.25
ÍBVFram
19%Clean sheet after half-time38%
ÍBVFram
44%No goal after half-time31%
ÍBVFram

ÍBV - second-half results

25% W25% R50% P
18
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Fram - second-half results

38% W38% R25% P
28
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

ÍBV - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.80
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Fram - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.20
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

ÍBV
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
4
7
16-30
3
3
31-45
4
10
46-60
5
5
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Fram
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
6
1
16-30
7
6
31-45
8
6
46-60
5
5
61-75
8
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 2.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
72%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

ÍBV

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.58
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
121%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Fram

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.54
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
145%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

ÍBVLigaFram
Average goals in match 3.753.97 4.31
Both teams scored 75%72% 69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%71% 69%
Clean sheets 6%16% 19%
Goal before half-time 75%80% 69%
Goal after half-time 94%86% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.97
Average goals per match
72%
Both teams scored
71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
16%
Clean sheets
2.21
Home goals / match
1.76
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
14%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
64%
2 goals
43%
3 goals
21%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): ÍBV 1 - 0 - 2 Fram. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Fram
5 : 1
ÍBV
Fram Reykjavík
2 : 0
ÍB Vestmannaeyja
ÍB Vestmannaeyja
3 : 1
Fram Reykjavík

FAQ

What was the result of ÍBV vs Fram?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished ÍBV 1:2 Fram. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between ÍBV and Fram?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches ÍBV won 1, Fram won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before ÍBV vs Fram?

ÍBV score 1.63 goals per game on average and Fram 2.56. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.97 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 75% of ÍBV's matches and 69% of Fram's.

What form are ÍBV and Fram in?

Over the last 5 games ÍBV have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Fram 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for ÍBV vs Fram?

The statistical background for ÍBV vs Fram — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.