Slovenia - 2. SNLData current as of 23 July 2026

Ilirija vs Dekani: match statistics

Ilirija crest
Ilirija
2 : 2half-time 0:1
Dekani crest
Dekani
135%(0.00)
X40%(0.00)
225%(0.00)

Statistical analysis indicates a closely contested match with a slight bias towards a draw. Ilirija displays poor home form with only a 22% win rate at their ground, although they have won their last two home matches. Dekani are characterized by a high percentage of draws away (56%), which, given their defensive stance (averaging 1.11 goals conceded), suggests scoring difficulties (FTS% 44%). Both teams have a similar shot conversion rate (8%) and comparable xG metrics, confirming the balanced level. Recent overall form slightly favors Dekani (1.6 PPG vs 1.4 PPG); however, their issues scoring away and Ilirija's trend of improvement in recent home fixtures argue for a draw.

Ilirija vs Dekani: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ilirija play Dekani in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match date is 20 March 2026 at 15:30. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Ilirija: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Dekani: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ilirija scores 1.27 and concedes 1.73 goals per match. Dekani scores 1.33 and concedes 1.53. League average: 2.82 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ilirija 70%, Dekani 53%. Over 2.5: Ilirija 60%, Dekani 53%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Ilirija has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.32. Ilirija: 11.3 shots per match, Dekani: 9.4.

Match halves

Ilirija: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.67. Dekani: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

Ilirija: 16-30 (9 goals). Dekani: 16-30 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Statistical analysis indicates a closely contested match with a slight bias towards a draw. Ilirija displays poor home form with only a 22% win rate at their ground, although they have won their last two home matches. Dekani are characterized by a high percentage of draws away (56%), which, given their defensive stance (averaging 1.11 goals conceded), suggests scoring difficulties (FTS% 44%). Both teams have a similar shot conversion rate (8%) and comparable xG metrics, confirming the balanced level. Recent overall form slightly favors Dekani (1.6 PPG vs 1.4 PPG); however, their issues scoring away and Ilirija's trend of improvement in recent home fixtures argue for a draw.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
IlirijaDekani
5Shots10
IlirijaDekani
3Shots on target4
IlirijaDekani
1.12xG1.59
IlirijaDekani
6Corners3
IlirijaDekani
81Dangerous attacks93
IlirijaDekani
-1Fouls-1
IlirijaDekani
-1Cards-1
IlirijaDekani

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.27Goals scored / match1.33
IlirijaDekani
1.73Goals conceded / match1.53
IlirijaDekani
52%Average possession45%
IlirijaDekani
4.4Shots on target / match3.67
IlirijaDekani

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.33Shots per match9.37
IlirijaDekani
4.4Shots on target3.67
IlirijaDekani
11.2%Shot conversion14.2%
IlirijaDekani
52%Possession45%
IlirijaDekani
1.57xG for1.32
IlirijaDekani
1.56xG against1.33
IlirijaDekani

Shooting quality

Ilirija: BalancedDekani: Counter-attacking
IlirijaDekani
Accuracy (shots on target)39%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Dekani is 167% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Ilirija · 1.6 pts / match - Dekani

Ilirija
LLWLL
Season result split
20% W30% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-9-15
0.90 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-7
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Dekani
DLWDW
Season result split
27% W30% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-9-13
1.10 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-7-7
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Dekani is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.27 goals / match - Ilirija · 1.33 goals / match - Dekani

Dekani is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.73 goals / match - Ilirija · 1.53 goals / match - Dekani

Ilirija scoring profile: very strong

Ilirija scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Dekani keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).

Dekani scoring profile: very strong

Dekani scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Ilirija keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 30 matches).

38Goals scored (season)40
IlirijaDekani
52Goals conceded (season)46
IlirijaDekani
3Average goals in match2.87
IlirijaDekani
3Goals scored (last 5)12
IlirijaDekani
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
IlirijaDekani

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal63%
IlirijaDekani
33%2 goals40%
IlirijaDekani
7%3 goals20%
IlirijaDekani
3%4 goals7%
IlirijaDekani

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal87%
IlirijaDekani
57%2 goals50%
IlirijaDekani
27%3 goals13%
IlirijaDekani
3%4 goals3%
IlirijaDekani

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time27%
IlirijaDekani
3%BTTS in both halves3%
IlirijaDekani
13%Scored in both halves23%
IlirijaDekani

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
IlirijaDekani
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
IlirijaDekani
40%BTTS - last 580%
IlirijaDekani

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
IlirijaDekani
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
IlirijaDekani
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
IlirijaDekani

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
IlirijaDekani
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
IlirijaDekani
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
IlirijaDekani

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ilirija - half-time state
30% leading20% draw50% trailing
Dekani - half-time state
23% leading37% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per match (1st half)1.07
IlirijaDekani
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.7
IlirijaDekani
0.87Goals conceded (1st half)0.77
IlirijaDekani
1.4Average goals (1st half)1.47
IlirijaDekani
43%Clean sheet before half-time37%
IlirijaDekani
60%No goal before half-time60%
IlirijaDekani

After half-time (2nd half)

1.37Points per match (2nd half)1.2
IlirijaDekani
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
IlirijaDekani
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.77
IlirijaDekani
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.4
IlirijaDekani
53%Clean sheet after half-time47%
IlirijaDekani
47%No goal after half-time53%
IlirijaDekani

Ilirija - second-half results

37% W27% R37% P
33
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Dekani - second-half results

30% W30% R40% P
32
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ilirija - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.20.4
Average goals in match1.60.6
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-4-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Dekani - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.00
Goals scored / match1.21.2
Goals conceded / match1.40.4
Average goals in match2.61.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ilirija
ScoredConceded
7
12
0-15
9
7
16-30
2
9
31-45
7
7
46-60
7
4
61-75
6
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Dekani
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
12
6
16-30
4
12
31-45
9
8
46-60
4
4
61-75
6
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.93
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+36%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ilirija

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
134%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Dekani

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

IlirijaLigaDekani
Average goals in match 3.002.82 2.87
Both teams scored 70%50% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%54% 53%
Clean sheets 17%28% 13%
Goal before half-time 83%74% 77%
Goal after half-time 80%81% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.82
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.29
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Ilirija 0 - 0 - 1 Dekani. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

NK Jadran Dekani
3 : 1
ND Ilirija 1911

FAQ

What was the result of Ilirija vs Dekani?

The 2. SNL match finished Ilirija 2:2 Dekani. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ilirija vs Dekani?

Ilirija score 1.27 goals per game on average and Dekani 1.33. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Ilirija's matches and 53% of Dekani's.

What form are Ilirija and Dekani in?

Over the last 5 games Ilirija have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Dekani 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ilirija vs Dekani?

The statistical background for Ilirija vs Dekani — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.