Ilirija vs Nafta: match statistics
Ilirija vs Nafta: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Ilirija play Nafta in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match date is 30 April 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Ilirija: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Nafta: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Ilirija scores 1.27 and concedes 1.73 goals per match. Nafta scores 2.17 and concedes 0.77. League average: 2.82 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Ilirija 70%, Nafta 60%. Over 2.5: Ilirija 60%, Nafta 47%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Nafta has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.57. Ilirija: 11.3 shots per match, Nafta: 12.3.
Match halves
Ilirija: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.67. Nafta: half-time lead 57%, second-half goals 1.23.
Goals by minute
Ilirija: 16-30 (9 goals). Nafta: 76-90+ (14 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
2. SNL: 2.82 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Nafta is the clear favorite for this fixture: they sit 1st in the table with a season record of 20 wins, 5 draws and 0 losses, while Ilirija are 11th with 5 wins, 9 draws and 11 losses. The visitors have scored 58 goals this season and 13 in the last 5 matches, averaging 2.0 goals on the road, whereas Ilirija have 35 goals this season and 9 in the last 5, with a home scoring average of 1.33 goals per game. Defensively Nafta is superior: they concede 0.67 goals on average away and keep 58% clean sheets on the road, while Ilirija concede 1.83 goals at home and have a 17% clean sheet rate. Although Ilirija’s home xG is 1.73 versus Nafta’s 1.48 away, Nafta are more efficient in chance conversion (shot conversion 18% vs 11%) and have had no goalless away matches (0%), translating into better opportunity conversion. Considering Nafta’s 5 wins in their last 5 matches (average 3 points per game) compared to Ilirija’s recent form of 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses (average 1.4 points), I forecast a victory for the visitors.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Ilirija | Nafta | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.43 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Nafta is 233% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Ilirija · 2 pts / match - Nafta
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nafta is 71% better for: goals scored per match.
1.27 goals / match - Ilirija · 2.17 goals / match - Nafta
Nafta is 125% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.73 goals / match - Ilirija · 0.77 goals / match - Nafta
Ilirija scores in 83% of matches (25 of 30 matches), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).
Nafta scores in 100% of matches (30 of 30 matches), while Ilirija keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 30 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Ilirija
Over / Under — Nafta
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nafta is 85% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.1 pts / match - Ilirija · 2.03 pts / match - Nafta
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ilirija - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Nafta - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 57% of matches and wins 77%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Ilirija
Nafta
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).
Teams vs league
| Ilirija | Liga | Nafta | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.00 | 2.82 | ▲ 2.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 70% | 50% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 60% | 54% | ▼ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 28% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 74% | ▲ 77% |
| Goal after half-time | • 80% | 81% | ▲ 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Ilirija 0 - 0 - 1 Nafta. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Ilirija vs Nafta?
The 2. SNL match finished Ilirija 0:2 Nafta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ilirija vs Nafta?
Ilirija score 1.27 goals per game on average and Nafta 2.17. The 2. SNL average is 2.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Ilirija's matches and 60% of Nafta's.
What form are Ilirija and Nafta in?
Over the last 5 games Ilirija have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Nafta 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ilirija vs Nafta?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.