Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of October 15, 2026

Ilves vs HJK: match statistics

Ilves crest
Ilves
1 : 2half-time 0:0
HJK crest
HJK

Ilves vs HJK: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Ilves played against HJK in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The game was played on August 31, 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Ilves has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. HJK has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Ilves scores 1.57 goals per game and allows 1.67. HJK scores 1.62 and allows 1.24. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 57% of Ilves's games and 38% of HJK's. The Over 2.5 rates are 62% and 57%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

HJK has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.40 per game. Ilves takes 11.5 shots per game, while HJK takes 13.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Ilves leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. HJK leads at halftime in 48% and scores 0.86 after halftime.

When the teams score

Ilves's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (7 goals). For HJK, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Veikkausliiga games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ilves have a clearly stronger home profile: they win 60% of their matches there, score an average of 1.6 goals and concede just 0.9, keeping a clean sheet in 60% of games. HJK also score 1.6 goals per away match, but lose 40% of such fixtures and fail to score in 30% of them, which could be a problem against the hosts’ well-organized defense. The visitors do create slightly more high-quality chances, however, with an average xG of 1.53 compared with Ilves’ 1.28, while also registering 12.9 shots per match to their opponents’ 9.6. Current form gives HJK a slight edge, as they have scored 7 goals and averaged 1.4 points per match across their last five league games, while Ilves have managed just 5 goals and 0.8 points. Despite their weaker recent run, Ilves’ home advantage and significantly stronger defense give the hosts a slight edge to win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal statistics clearly point towards a low BTTS profile: Ilves recorded both teams scoring in 36% of matches, while HJK did so in 40%, compared with the league average of 50%. Ilves kept a clean sheet in 45% of matches, while HJK failed to score in 30% of their appearances, so there is a realistic path to a scenario in which one side remains scoreless. In their last five league matches, Ilves scored just 5 goals, averaging 1.0 per game, with a low xG of 0.99, while HJK's defense conceded just 1.12 xG on average. HJK are more likely to score because Ilves allowed opponents 2.13 xG across their last five matches; however, the hosts' weaker current attacking output provides stronger support for BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have the seasonal attacking potential to score more than 1.5 goals per match: Ilves average 1.64 goals, while HJK average 1.60. HJK create an average of 1.53 xG, while Ilves’ defense allows as much as 1.52 xG, supporting the visitors’ chances of scoring at least once. Ilves have been less effective in attack recently, averaging 1.0 goal and 0.99 xG across their last five matches, but HJK have conceded in 70% of their games this season. The 1.5 line offers a clearer edge than 2.5, as over 1.5 goals were scored in 64% of Ilves matches and 80% of HJK matches, while recent form limits confidence in a high-scoring game.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by an HJK victory at the final whistle, as HJK have not conceded a single goal before the break in their last five matches, while Ilves have averaged just 0.8 first-half goals during that period. However, the hosts have been dangerous from the start of the season, leading at the break in 55% of their matches and conceding an average of only 0.45 goals in the first half, which increases the likelihood of an evenly contested opening period. Current form more clearly favors the visitors: HJK have collected 1.4 points per match over their last five league fixtures compared with Ilves’ 0.8, while the hosts have lost three of those five games. After the break, HJK average 1.0 goal per match over the season, whereas Ilves concede 0.82, giving the visitors solid grounds to turn a level first stage in their favor.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 2
Second half

Game stats

44Possession (%)56
IlvesHJK
9Shots19
IlvesHJK
4Shots on target4
IlvesHJK
1.14xG2
IlvesHJK
6Corners4
IlvesHJK
40Dangerous attacks72
IlvesHJK
12Fouls8
IlvesHJK
1Cards1
IlvesHJK

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.57Goals scored / game1.62
IlvesHJK
1.67Goals allowed / game1.24
IlvesHJK
50%Average possession54%
IlvesHJK
4.52Shots on target / game4.62
IlvesHJK

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.48Shots per game13
IlvesHJK
4.52Shots on target4.62
IlvesHJK
13.7%Shot conversion12.5%
IlvesHJK
50%Possession54%
IlvesHJK
1.4xG for1.54
IlvesHJK
1.64xG against1.39
IlvesHJK

Shooting quality

Ilves: Efficient finishingHJK: Balanced
IlvesHJK
Accuracy (shots on target)39%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

HJK is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Ilves · 1.8 pts / game - HJK

Ilves
WLWLL
Season result split
33% W19% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-10
1.19 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WDWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
HJK
WLWWL
Season result split
48% W19% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-4-7
1.62 pts / game · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-4
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WWLLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.54Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

HJK is 35% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.67 goals / game - Ilves · 1.24 goals / game - HJK

Ilves scoring profile: very strong

Ilves scores in 86% of games (18 of 21 games), while HJK keeps a clean sheet in 38% (8 of 21 games).

HJK scoring profile: very strong

HJK scores in 76% of games (16 of 21 games), while Ilves keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 games).

33Goals scored (season)34
IlvesHJK
35Goals conceded (season)26
IlvesHJK
3.24Average goals per game2.86
IlvesHJK
5Goals scored (last 5)7
IlvesHJK
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
IlvesHJK

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal76%
IlvesHJK
48%2 goals43%
IlvesHJK
14%3 goals29%
IlvesHJK
5%4 goals10%
IlvesHJK

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal62%
IlvesHJK
52%2 goals38%
IlvesHJK
29%3 goals19%
IlvesHJK
10%4 goals5%
IlvesHJK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time19%
IlvesHJK
10%BTTS in both halves10%
IlvesHJK
29%Scored in both halves38%
IlvesHJK

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
IlvesHJK
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS29%
IlvesHJK
20%BTTS - last 520%
IlvesHJK

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

86%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
IlvesHJK
57%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
IlvesHJK
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
IlvesHJK

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
IlvesHJK
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time52%
IlvesHJK
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
IlvesHJK

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

HJK is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.43 pts / game - Ilves · 1.67 pts / game - HJK

Ilves - half-time state
38% leading29% draw33% trailing
HJK - half-time state
48% leading24% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.43Points per game (1st half)1.67
IlvesHJK
0.9Goals scored (1st half)0.76
IlvesHJK
1.05Goals conceded (1st half)0.48
IlvesHJK
1.95Average goals (1st half)1.24
IlvesHJK
48%Clean sheet before half-time62%
IlvesHJK
38%No goal before half-time33%
IlvesHJK

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per game (2nd half)1.48
IlvesHJK
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
IlvesHJK
0.62Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
IlvesHJK
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.62
IlvesHJK
52%Clean sheet after half-time57%
IlvesHJK
48%No goal after half-time52%
IlvesHJK

Ilves - second-half results

33% W38% D29% L
30
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding87%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 33%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime-0.4

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

HJK - second-half results

38% W33% D29% L
35
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 48% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Ilves - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.60
Goals scored / game1.00.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game1.60.4
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference+2-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
HJK - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.601.00
Goals scored / game1.20.2
Goals allowed / game0.01.2
Average goals per game1.21.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet100%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+6-5
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Ilves
ScoredConceded
5
7
0-15
7
5
16-30
7
10
31-45
5
5
46-60
4
2
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

HJK
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
5
4
16-30
8
3
31-45
5
5
46-60
6
7
61-75
7
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.05
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
116%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+51%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Ilves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

HJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

IlvesLigaHJK
Average goals per game▲ 3.242.63▲ 2.86
Both teams scored▲ 57%50%▼ 38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 62%48%▲ 57%
Clean sheets• 29%28%▲ 38%
Goal before half-time▲ 86%76%▲ 86%
Goal after half-time▲ 81%75%• 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.48
Home goals / game
1.15
Away goals / game
+29%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defensive advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. IlvesSubstitutionOn: Bamba Abdoul GoudoussOff: Oliver Pettersson
  2. HJKYellow cardMartin Kirilov
  3. IlvesYellow cardFaris Krkalic
  4. HJKSubstitutionOn: Mouhamed GueyeOff: Alexander Ring

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Ilves's perspective: 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against HJK. Games average 4.60 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

HJK
2 : 2
Ilves
Tampereen Ilves
3 : 1
Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi
Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi
2 : 2
Tampereen Ilves
Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi
5 : 1
Tampereen Ilves
Tampereen Ilves
3 : 2
Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi

FAQ

What was the result of Ilves vs HJK?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Ilves 1:2 HJK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Ilves and HJK?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Ilves won 2, HJK won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.60 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Ilves vs HJK?

Ilves score 1.57 goals per game on average and HJK 1.62. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Ilves's matches and 38% of HJK's.

What form are Ilves and HJK in?

Over the last 5 games Ilves have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and HJK 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ilves vs HJK?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ilves vs HJK: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.