Japan - J2 LeagueYume StadiumData current as of August 13, 2026

Imabari vs Omiya Ardija: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Imabari vs Omiya Ardija: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Imabari plays Omiya Ardija in J2 League (Japan). The game is scheduled for August 15, 2026. Venue: Yume Stadium.

Recent form

Imabari has 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Omiya Ardija has 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Imabari scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 2.00. Omiya Ardija scores 1.00 and allows 0.00. Games in this league average 1.80 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 100% of Imabari's games and 0% of Omiya Ardija's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 0%, compared with league averages of 20% for BTTS and 10% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Omiya Ardija has the higher season xG average, 2.02 to 1.38 per game. Imabari takes 13.0 shots per game, while Omiya Ardija takes 20.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Imabari leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Omiya Ardija leads at halftime in 100% and scores 0.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Imabari's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (1 goals). For Omiya Ardija, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

J2 League games average 1.80 goals. Both teams score in 20% of games, and 10% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(3.15)
(3.35)
(2.12)

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1Goals scored / game1
ImabariOmiya Ardija
2Goals allowed / game0
ImabariOmiya Ardija
60%Average possession46%
ImabariOmiya Ardija
3Shots on target / game3
ImabariOmiya Ardija

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13Shots per game20
ImabariOmiya Ardija
3Shots on target3
ImabariOmiya Ardija
7.7%Shot conversion5%
ImabariOmiya Ardija
60%Possession46%
ImabariOmiya Ardija
1.38xG for2.02
ImabariOmiya Ardija
1.67xG against1.2
ImabariOmiya Ardija

Shooting quality

Imabari: BalancedOmiya Ardija: Attacking
ImabariOmiya Ardija
Accuracy (shots on target)23%15%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Imabari
L
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W0% R100% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Omiya Ardija
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 2.02Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Imabari scoring profile: mixed

Imabari scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 meczów), while Omiya Ardija keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 meczów).

Omiya Ardija scoring profile: very strong

Omiya Ardija scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 meczów), while Imabari keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 meczów).

1Goals scored (season)1
ImabariOmiya Ardija
2Goals conceded (season)0
ImabariOmiya Ardija
3Average goals per game1
ImabariOmiya Ardija
1Goals scored (last 5)1
ImabariOmiya Ardija
2Goals conceded (last 5)0
ImabariOmiya Ardija

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
ImabariOmiya Ardija
0%2 goals0%
ImabariOmiya Ardija
0%3 goals0%
ImabariOmiya Ardija
0%4 goals0%
ImabariOmiya Ardija

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal0%
ImabariOmiya Ardija
100%2 goals0%
ImabariOmiya Ardija
0%3 goals0%
ImabariOmiya Ardija
0%4 goals0%
ImabariOmiya Ardija

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

20%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
ImabariOmiya Ardija
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ImabariOmiya Ardija
0%Scored in both halves0%
ImabariOmiya Ardija

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
ImabariOmiya Ardija
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ImabariOmiya Ardija
100%BTTS - last 50%
ImabariOmiya Ardija

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

0%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
ImabariOmiya Ardija
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
ImabariOmiya Ardija
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
ImabariOmiya Ardija

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time0%
ImabariOmiya Ardija
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
ImabariOmiya Ardija
100%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
ImabariOmiya Ardija

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Omiya Ardija is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - Imabari · 3 pts / game - Omiya Ardija

Imabari - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Omiya Ardija - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)3
ImabariOmiya Ardija
0Goals scored (1st half)1
ImabariOmiya Ardija
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
ImabariOmiya Ardija
0Average goals (1st half)1
ImabariOmiya Ardija
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
ImabariOmiya Ardija
100%No goal before half-time0%
ImabariOmiya Ardija

After half-time (2nd half)

0Points per game (2nd half)1
ImabariOmiya Ardija
1Goals scored (2nd half)0
ImabariOmiya Ardija
2Goals conceded (2nd half)0
ImabariOmiya Ardija
3Average goals (2nd half)0
ImabariOmiya Ardija
0%Clean sheet after half-time100%
ImabariOmiya Ardija
0%No goal after half-time100%
ImabariOmiya Ardija

Imabari - second-half results

0% W0% R100% P
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+2.0

Allows 2.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Omiya Ardija - second-half results

0% W100% R0% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 100%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Imabari - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.00
Goals scored / game0.01.0
Goals allowed / game0.02.0
Average goals per game0.03.0
1 goal0%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%100%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Omiya Ardija - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game3.001.00
Goals scored / game1.00.0
Goals allowed / game0.00.0
Average goals per game1.00.0
1 goal100%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal0%100%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Imabari
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Omiya Ardija
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Imabari

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.71
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
500%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Omiya Ardija

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.82
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+1.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
250%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 100% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).

Teams vs league

ImabariLigaOmiya Ardija
Average goals per game 3.001.80 1.00
Both teams scored 100%20% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%10% 0%
Clean sheets 0%40% 100%
Goal before half-time 0%80% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%80% 0%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.80
Average goals per game
20%
Both teams scored
10%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / game
0.40
Away goals / game
+250%
Home attack advantage
+71%
Home defensive advantage
+50%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
0%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
10%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Imabari's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Omiya Ardija. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Omiya Ardija
2 : 3
FC Imabari
FC Imabari
0 : 0
Omiya Ardija

FAQ

When do Imabari and Omiya Ardija play?

Imabari face Omiya Ardija on August 15, 2026 in J2 League at Yume Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Imabari and Omiya Ardija?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Imabari won 1, Omiya Ardija won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Imabari vs Omiya Ardija?

Imabari score 1.00 goals per game on average and Omiya Ardija 1.00. The J2 League average is 1.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 10% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Imabari's matches and 0% of Omiya Ardija's.

What form are Imabari and Omiya Ardija in?

Over the last 5 games Imabari have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and Omiya Ardija 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Imabari vs Omiya Ardija?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.