INCA-Aruba vs Cacahuatique: match statistics
INCA-Aruba vs Cacahuatique: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
INCA-Aruba played against Cacahuatique in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
INCA-Aruba has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Cacahuatique has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
INCA-Aruba scores 0.33 goals per game and allows 2.50. Cacahuatique scores 1.50 and allows 1.83. Games in this league average 2.50 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of INCA-Aruba's games and 67% of Cacahuatique's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 67%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 42% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
INCA-Aruba has the higher season xG average, 1.31 to 1.30 per game. INCA-Aruba takes 9.3 shots per game, while Cacahuatique takes 8.5.
First-half and second-half trends
INCA-Aruba leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Cacahuatique leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.83 after halftime.
When the teams score
INCA-Aruba's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (2 goals). For Cacahuatique, it is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.50 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 42% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
INCA-Aruba remain winless after six matches this season, scoring just 1 goal and conceding 12 across their last five fixtures. At home, the hosts average only 0.33 goals, have failed to score in 67% of such matches, and allow opponents an average of 2.33 goals. Cacahuatique have a clearly more stable recent run: they have suffered just one defeat in their last five matches, scoring 7 goals and conceding 7, while INCA-Aruba have lost four times. The visitors create chances worth an average xG of 1.37 away from home, while the hosts’ defense allows opponents an xG of 1.97, pointing to favourable conditions for Cacahuatique to overcome their poor away finishing. A draw remains a realistic possibility, as Cacahuatique’s only away match so far ended 0:0, but the hosts’ very weak defense and form give a slight edge to an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS scenario does not have the edge, as INCA-Aruba have scored just 1 goal in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.2 per game, while BTTS has occurred in only 20% of their matches during this period. Cacahuatique should have good conditions to score: the hosts have recently conceded an average of 2.4 goals, with an xG against them of 2.04, while the visitors have scored an average of 1.4 goals. The most likely outcome is therefore a goal for the visitors alongside another modest attacking return from the hosts. The case for BTTS is supported by INCA-Aruba’s xG of 1.35 across their last five appearances, but Cacahuatique allow an average of 1.44 xG, and the hosts’ poor finishing significantly reduces the likelihood of both teams scoring. In addition, the league BTTS average is only 44%, supporting the selection where at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
INCA-Aruba are in very poor defensive form: they have conceded an average of 2.4 goals over their last 5 matches, while their average xG conceded to opponents was as high as 2.04. During this period, Cacahuatique scored 1.4 goals per match and generated 1.27 xG, which, against the hosts’ defensive weaknesses, gives the visitors a realistic chance of scoring at least once. The hosts have scored just 1 goal in their last five matches, but their average xG of 1.35 over this period, combined with the 1.44 xG conceded by Cacahuatique, leaves room for them to add a goal. In the last five matches of both teams, the 2.5-goal line was exceeded in 40% and 60% of cases respectively, so higher lines do not have equally strong support. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as the projected total of 2.40 goals combines INCA-Aruba’s clear defensive weakness with sufficient attacking potential from both sides.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Cacahuatique win, as the hosts were level after 45 minutes in 3 of their last 5 matches, while the visitors were level in 4 of 5. INCA-Aruba have not won any of their last five matches, scoring just 0.2 goals per game and conceding 2.4, whereas Cacahuatique averaged 1.4 goals scored and 1.2 points per match. The difference in form is even more pronounced after the break: the hosts averaged 0.2 goals scored and 1.8 conceded, while the visitors scored 0.8 goals and conceded just 0.4. The visitors’ seasonal data is very limited, but their recent results, featuring a 60% draw rate and only 20% defeats, point to a team capable of maintaining parity before half-time and turning the match in their favor late on.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| INCA-Aruba | Cacahuatique | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 45% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.08 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Cacahuatique is 500% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - INCA-Aruba · 1.2 pts / game - Cacahuatique
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cacahuatique is 355% better for: goals scored per game.
0.33 goals / game - INCA-Aruba · 1.5 goals / game - Cacahuatique
Cacahuatique is 37% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.5 goals / game - INCA-Aruba · 1.83 goals / game - Cacahuatique
INCA-Aruba scores in 33% of games (2 of 6 meczów), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 meczów).
Cacahuatique scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 meczów), while INCA-Aruba keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - INCA-Aruba
Over / Under - Cacahuatique
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cacahuatique is 134% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.5 pts / game - INCA-Aruba · 1.17 pts / game - Cacahuatique
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
INCA-Aruba - second-half results
Allows 1.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Cacahuatique - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 17%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
INCA-Aruba
Cacahuatique
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| INCA-Aruba | Liga | Cacahuatique | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.83 | 2.50 | ▲ 3.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 47% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 42% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 35% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 61% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 67% | • 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- CacahuatiqueGoalHerbert Arnoldo Sosa Burgos
FAQ
What was the result of INCA-Aruba vs Cacahuatique?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished INCA-Aruba 1:1 Cacahuatique. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before INCA-Aruba vs Cacahuatique?
INCA-Aruba score 0.33 goals per game on average and Cacahuatique 1.50. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 33% of INCA-Aruba's matches and 67% of Cacahuatique's.
What form are INCA-Aruba and Cacahuatique in?
Over the last 5 games INCA-Aruba have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Cacahuatique 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for INCA-Aruba vs Cacahuatique?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for INCA-Aruba vs Cacahuatique: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.