İnter Bakı vs Kapaz: match statistics
İnter Bakı vs Kapaz: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
İnter Bakı played against Kapaz in Premyer Liqası (Azerbaijan). The game was played on April 26, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
İnter Bakı has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Kapaz has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
İnter Bakı scores 0.89 goals per game and allows 1.04. Kapaz scores 0.79 and allows 1.96. Games in this league average 2.55 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of İnter Bakı's games and 32% of Kapaz's. The Over 2.5 rates are 39% and 50%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kapaz has the higher season xG average, 1.18 to 1.05 per game. İnter Bakı takes 8.1 shots per game, while Kapaz takes 9.9.
First-half and second-half trends
İnter Bakı leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Kapaz leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.39 after halftime.
When the teams score
İnter Bakı's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Kapaz, it is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Premyer Liqası games average 2.55 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I forecast a home win (1): İnter Bakı has a clearly superior defense compared to Kapaz — the visitors have conceded 55 goals this season (avg. 2.21 away), while İnter concedes 1.36 goals per home match. This season İnter has scored 25 goals versus Kapaz’s 22, and Kapaz’s away goal differential is −19 compared to İnter’s −6 at home, indicating greater vulnerability from the visitors. Offensively both teams are inefficient: İnter scores 0.93 goals per home match, Kapaz 0.86 away, yet İnter shows better accuracy (2.79 shots on target per match) and higher conversion (12% vs 9%). xG data indicate similar chance creation (İnter home xG 1.01 vs Kapaz away xG 1.10), but Kapaz concedes significantly more expected goals on the road (xG against 1.69 vs İnter’s 1.30 at home). Considering the hosts’ more solid defense, a higher clean sheet rate at home (36% vs 14%) and the fact Kapaz fail to register a shot on target in 57% of away matches, I assign a 60% probability to a home win, 25% to a draw and 15% to an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have low BTTS rates: season BTTS is 29% for İnter Bakı and 36% for Kapaz, and in the last 5 matches 20% and 40% respectively, which is below the league average of 44%. Average goals per match are only 0.71 (İnter) and 0.86 (Kapaz), with xG 1.24 and 1.10, meaning teams create chances but finish poorly (shot conversion 7% and 9%). Kapaz concedes on average 2.21 goals per match (55 conceded), and İnter 1.71 (29 conceded); in the last 5 matches İnter scored 2 and conceded 3, and Kapaz scored 3 and conceded 8, showing low attacking productivity for both sides. Additionally, 65% of league matches end with a clean sheet for one of the teams, which together with the low seasonal BTTS rates leads me to the scenario that both teams will not score; therefore I assign 70% to "No" (BTTS - No) and 30% to "Yes" (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals are estimated at ~1.47 for İnter Bakı (xG_for 1.24 and opponents' xG_against 1.69 → (1.24+1.69)/2 ≈ 1.47) and ~1.42 for Kapaz (xG_for 1.10 and hosts' xG_against 1.74 → (1.10+1.74)/2 = 1.42); total ≈ 2.89. Actual season goals are lower (hosts 0.71, away 0.86), but both teams concede heavily (İnter Bakı 1.71, Kapaz 2.21), which increases the likelihood of a multi-goal game. Season percentages show 79% of matches involving both teams finished over 1.5 goals; additionally Kapaz had 64% of games over 2.5 (versus İnter Bakı’s 36%), which together with xG 2.89 supports the over market. Based on this the safest line is Over 1.5 (I estimate ~80%), Over 2.5 has a moderate chance (~58%), and Over 3.5 is less likely (~30%), therefore I recommend playing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win by full-time (X/1). Hosts were level at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches (80% in the last 5), and seasonally the half-time draw occurs for the home side in 36% and for the away side in 29% of matches, favouring a tie at the 45-minute mark. Inter Bakı holds an xG advantage (1.24 versus the away side’s 1.10) and more on-target shots (3.36 vs 2.29), which increases their chances of scoring after the break. Additionally, the visitors concede on average 2.21 goals per match versus 1.71 for the hosts, and in the last 5 matches the home side has earned an average of 1.2 points in second halves compared with 0.6 points for the away side, so I expect the half-time draw to be overturned in favor of Inter Bakı.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| İnter Bakı | Kapaz | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
İnter Bakı is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - İnter Bakı · 0.8 pts / game - Kapaz
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
İnter Bakı is 13% better for: goals scored per game.
0.89 goals / game - İnter Bakı · 0.79 goals / game - Kapaz
İnter Bakı is 88% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.04 goals / game - İnter Bakı · 1.96 goals / game - Kapaz
İnter Bakı scores in 64% of games (18 of 28 meczów), while Kapaz keeps a clean sheet in 18% (5 of 28 meczów).
Kapaz scores in 46% of games (13 of 28 meczów), while İnter Bakı keeps a clean sheet in 43% (12 of 28 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - İnter Bakı
Over / Under - Kapaz
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
İnter Bakı is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.18 pts / game - İnter Bakı · 0.75 pts / game - Kapaz
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
İnter Bakı - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Kapaz - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 21%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
İnter Bakı
Kapaz
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premyer Liqası).
Teams vs league
| İnter Bakı | Liga | Kapaz | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.93 | 2.55 | ▲ 2.75 |
| Both teams scored | • 43% | 44% | ▼ 32% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 39% | 46% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 33% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 46% | 66% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 64% | 72% | • 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from İnter Bakı's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Kapaz. Games average 3.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of İnter Bakı vs Kapaz?
The Premyer Liqası match finished İnter Bakı 2:0 Kapaz. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between İnter Bakı and Kapaz?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches İnter Bakı won 1, Kapaz won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before İnter Bakı vs Kapaz?
İnter Bakı score 0.89 goals per game on average and Kapaz 0.79. The Premyer Liqası average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 43% of İnter Bakı's matches and 32% of Kapaz's.
What form are İnter Bakı and Kapaz in?
Over the last 5 games İnter Bakı have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Kapaz 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for İnter Bakı vs Kapaz?
The statistical background for İnter Bakı vs Kapaz — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


