Azerbaijan - Premyer LiqasıData current as of September 11, 2026

İnter Bakı vs Sabah: match statistics

İnter Bakı crest
İnter Bakı
0 : 3half-time 0:1
Sabah crest
Sabah

İnter Bakı vs Sabah: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

İnter Bakı played against Sabah in Premyer Liqası (Azerbaijan). The game was played on May 3, 2026. Final score: 0:3.

Recent form

İnter Bakı has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Sabah has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.

Scoring records

İnter Bakı scores 0.93 goals per game and allows 1.00. Sabah scores 2.38 and allows 0.72. Games in this league average 2.56 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 41% of İnter Bakı's games and 52% of Sabah's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 59%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Sabah has the higher season xG average, 1.86 to 1.10 per game. İnter Bakı takes 8.6 shots per game, while Sabah takes 13.9.

First-half and second-half trends

İnter Bakı leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.55 goals per game after halftime. Sabah leads at halftime in 52% and scores 1.24 after halftime.

When the teams score

İnter Bakı's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). For Sabah, it is minutes 46-60 (17 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Premyer Liqası games average 2.56 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Sabah is the clear favorite: they sit 1st with a record of 22 wins, 6 draws and 1 loss, and additionally win 79% of their away matches; İnter Bakı are 7th with 8 wins, 11 draws and 10 losses and a 27% home win rate. The visitors’ attack is markedly more efficient — Sabah have 69 goals this season and average 2.5 goals away with a shot conversion rate of 21%, whereas İnter have scored 27 goals and average 1.0 goal at home with a 12% conversion. The quality of created chances corroborates this: Sabah’s average away xG is 1.55 versus İnter’s 1.12, while average shots 11.71 vs 8.6 and shots on target 5.43 vs 3.27 indicate a clear advantage for the visitors. Defensively Sabah also look stronger — they concede 0.86 goals away and keep 43% clean sheets, whereas İnter concede 1.27 at home and fail to score in 33% of home matches; this facilitates the visitors’ control of the game with 55% possession versus the hosts’ 43%. Sabah have 4 wins and 1 draw in their last 5 (11 scored and 5 conceded, averaging 2.6 points per game), while İnter have 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses in their last 5 (3 scored and 3 conceded, averaging 1.0 point), therefore I predict a Sabah victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes with a 60% vs 40% confidence because the seasonal profiles of both teams favor goals at both ends: Sabah averages 2.50 goals per game and has BTTS in 57% of matches, while İnter Bakı scores 2.27 at home on average and has a seasonal BTTS rate of 47%. However, İnter shows a clear drop in form over the last 5 matches — only 3 goals (0.6 per game) and 20% BTTS — which reduces forecast confidence. Sabah in their last 5 matches scored 11 goals (2.2 per game) and their games ended BTTS in 60% of cases, and opponents against Sabah average 1.0 goal, so the visitors both score and concede. Additionally, xG shows İnter generates 2.14 xG per game against Sabah’s defense that concedes 1.14 xG, and the hosts average 15.87 shots with 6.4 on target, suggesting real scoring opportunities despite lower conversion (14%). Summing Sabah’s higher seasonal BTTS share (57% vs league 45%) and the visitors’ strong attacking form, a both-teams-to-score scenario looks more likely, albeit with moderate confidence due to İnter’s recent inefficiency.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

A model based on xG and both teams' defensive averages yields expected goals of 1.64 for İnter Bakı (attack xG 2.14; xG conceded vs Sabah 1.14) and 1.28 for Sabah (attack xG 1.55; xG conceded vs İnter 1.01), totaling 2.92. Seasonal shares of matches over 1.5 are 73% for İnter and 79% for Sabah, while the league average goals per match is 2.56, which strongly supports Over 1.5. A Poisson model with lambda=2.92 gives probabilities of Over 1.5 ≈79%, Over 2.5 ≈56% and Over 3.5 ≈34%, and seasonal figures for the 2.5 line are 47% (İnter) and 71% (Sabah), confirming a moderate signal for Over 2.5. Sabah have season averages of 2.50 goals scored and a shot conversion of 21% (11 goals in the last 5 matches), while İnter have season 2.27 and only 3 goals in the last 5 matches, which strengthens the away-side scoring perspective. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (79% vs 21%), therefore I recommend backing Over at the 1.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Sabah looks strongest on paper: the visitors led at the break in 9 matches (64%) while İnter Bakı led only in 6 (40%), with total goals scored by halftime 32 versus 25 and average halftime goals 2.29 vs 1.67, indicating Sabah’s advantage already in the first half. The last 5 matches confirm this trend — Sabah won 4 of 5 (80%) while İnter Bakı only 1 of 5 (20%), and in those five first halves the visitors scored 8 goals versus 1 for the hosts. Technically İnter Bakı has higher xG (2.14 vs 1.55) and more shots (15.87 vs 11.71), but Sabah converts chances better (21% vs 14%) and has a higher average of first-half goals (1.21 vs 1.07), increasing the likelihood of an early goal by the visitors. Considering Sabah’s more frequent leads at the break (64%), better form (80% wins in the last 5) and efficiency, the most likely scenario is the visitors leading at Half-Time and winning after 90 minutes. I assigned 42% probability to 2/2, 24% to X/2 and 4% to 1/2 as the main variants for Sabah’s win; remaining scenarios (e.g. X/X 9%, 2/X 8%, 1/1 5%) have weaker data support.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

31Possession (%)69
İnter BakıSabah
12Shots25
İnter BakıSabah
3Shots on target13
İnter BakıSabah
1.27xG2.97
İnter BakıSabah
4Corners8
İnter BakıSabah
42Dangerous attacks68
İnter BakıSabah
10Fouls11
İnter BakıSabah
0Cards3
İnter BakıSabah

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

İnter BakıSabah
0.93Goals scored / game2.38
İnter BakıSabah
1Goals allowed / game0.72
İnter BakıSabah
40%Average possession57%
İnter BakıSabah
3.1Shots on target / game5.93
İnter BakıSabah

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.59Shots per game13.86
İnter BakıSabah
3.1Shots on target5.93
İnter BakıSabah
10.8%Shot conversion17.2%
İnter BakıSabah
40%Possession57%
İnter BakıSabah
1.1xG for1.86
İnter BakıSabah
1.35xG against1.08
İnter BakıSabah

Shooting quality

İnter Bakı: BalancedSabah: Efficient finishing
İnter BakıSabah
Accuracy (shots on target)36%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Sabah is 160% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - İnter Bakı · 2.6 pts / game - Sabah

İnter Bakı
LDDLW
Season result split
28% W38% D34% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-11-10
1.21 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-6
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DDLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%
Sabah
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
76% W21% D3% L
Season (W-D-L)
22-6-1
2.48 pts / game · goal difference +48
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
11-3-0
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.96Opponent xG: 0.91BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sabah is 156% better for: goals scored per game.

0.93 goals / game - İnter Bakı · 2.38 goals / game - Sabah

Sabah is 39% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - İnter Bakı · 0.72 goals / game - Sabah

İnter Bakı scoring profile: mixed

İnter Bakı scores in 66% of games (19 of 29 meczów), while Sabah keeps a clean sheet in 45% (13 of 29 meczów).

Sabah scoring profile: very strong

Sabah scores in 90% of games (26 of 29 meczów), while İnter Bakı keeps a clean sheet in 45% (13 of 29 meczów).

27Goals scored (season)69
İnter BakıSabah
29Goals conceded (season)21
İnter BakıSabah
1.93Average goals per game3.1
İnter BakıSabah
3Goals scored (last 5)12
İnter BakıSabah
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
İnter BakıSabah

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal90%
İnter BakıSabah
21%2 goals72%
İnter BakıSabah
7%3 goals45%
İnter BakıSabah
0%4 goals17%
İnter BakıSabah

How often they concede at least...

55%1 goal55%
İnter BakıSabah
31%2 goals14%
İnter BakıSabah
7%3 goals3%
İnter BakıSabah
7%4 goals0%
İnter BakıSabah

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

45%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time14%
İnter BakıSabah
0%BTTS in both halves0%
İnter BakıSabah
3%Scored in both halves45%
İnter BakıSabah

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
İnter BakıSabah
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
İnter BakıSabah
20%BTTS - last 560%
İnter BakıSabah

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

45%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
İnter BakıSabah
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
İnter BakıSabah
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time28%
İnter BakıSabah

2nd half

66%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
İnter BakıSabah
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time55%
İnter BakıSabah
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
İnter BakıSabah

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sabah is 68% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / game - İnter Bakı · 1.97 pts / game - Sabah

İnter Bakı - half-time state
17% leading66% draw17% trailing
Sabah - half-time state
52% leading41% draw7% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per game (1st half)1.97
İnter BakıSabah
0.38Goals scored (1st half)1.14
İnter BakıSabah
0.31Goals conceded (1st half)0.24
İnter BakıSabah
0.69Average goals (1st half)1.38
İnter BakıSabah
72%Clean sheet before half-time83%
İnter BakıSabah
69%No goal before half-time38%
İnter BakıSabah

After half-time (2nd half)

1.1Points per game (2nd half)2
İnter BakıSabah
0.55Goals scored (2nd half)1.24
İnter BakıSabah
0.69Goals conceded (2nd half)0.48
İnter BakıSabah
1.24Average goals (2nd half)1.72
İnter BakıSabah
55%Clean sheet after half-time62%
İnter BakıSabah
62%No goal after half-time28%
İnter BakıSabah

İnter Bakı - second-half results

21% W48% D31% L
34
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding165%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 28%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Sabah - second-half results

55% W34% D10% L
57
Half-time points
33
Half-time goals
+26
Goal difference (1st half)
58
Second-half points
+22
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at halftime in 52% of games and wins 76%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

İnter Bakı - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.20
Goals scored / game0.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game0.21.0
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Sabah - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.60
Goals scored / game1.01.4
Goals allowed / game0.80.2
Average goals per game1.81.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+1+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

İnter Bakı
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
3
1
16-30
4
6
31-45
3
5
46-60
7
4
61-75
6
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Sabah
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
13
1
16-30
11
4
31-45
17
2
46-60
9
3
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (17 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.51
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.8 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-40%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

İnter Bakı

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.21
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Sabah

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.78
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.88
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.52
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
187%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
56%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premyer Liqası).

Teams vs league

İnter BakıLigaSabah
Average goals per game 1.932.56 3.10
Both teams scored 41%45% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%46% 59%
Clean sheets 45%32% 45%
Goal before half-time 45%65% 66%
Goal after half-time 66%73% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.56
Average goals per game
45%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.28
Home goals / game
1.27
Away goals / game
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defensive advantage
+-3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SabahYellow cardRəhman Daşdəmirov
  2. SabahSubstitutionOn: Tellur MütəllimovOff: Tymoteusz Puchacz
  3. SabahYellow cardIvan Lepinjica
  4. İnter BakıSubstitutionOn: Abdullahi ShuaibuOff: Karim Rossi
  5. İnter BakıSubstitutionOn: Bilal IsmayilovOff: Emil Süleymanov
  6. SabahSubstitutionOn: Cəfər MuxtarovOff: Ivan Lepinjica
  7. SabahYellow cardCəfər Muxtarov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Kamal UmudluMatches officiated: 10
3.5Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 210%Home wins20%Draws70%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from İnter Bakı's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Sabah. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Sabah FK
0 : 0
FC İnter Bakı
FC İnter Bakı
1 : 2
Sabah FK

FAQ

What was the result of İnter Bakı vs Sabah?

The Premyer Liqası match finished İnter Bakı 0:3 Sabah. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between İnter Bakı and Sabah?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches İnter Bakı won 0, Sabah won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before İnter Bakı vs Sabah?

İnter Bakı score 0.93 goals per game on average and Sabah 2.38. The Premyer Liqası average is 2.56 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 41% of İnter Bakı's matches and 52% of Sabah's.

What form are İnter Bakı and Sabah in?

Over the last 5 games İnter Bakı have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Sabah 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for İnter Bakı vs Sabah?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.