Inter II vs AlbinoLeffe: match statistics
Statistical analysis indicates a balanced rivalry with a lean towards a draw. Inter II presents poor form in home matches with 57% draws and just 14% wins, recording four draws in their last five meetings. AlbinoLeffe also has a high tendency to draw on the road (50%) but has better overall form (1.6 PPG vs 0.8 PPG). The hosts have a slight advantage in expected goals (xG 1.62 vs 1.17), yet a low conversion rate (6% vs 12% for the visitors). Both teams show a similar percentage of clean sheets (36%), suggesting a defensive balance. Taking into account the hosts' poor form in recent matches and the tendency of both teams to draw, the most likely result is a share of the points.
Inter II vs AlbinoLeffe: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Inter II played against AlbinoLeffe in Serie C Group A (Italy). The game was played on March 7, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Inter II has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. AlbinoLeffe has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Inter II scores 1.13 goals per game and allows 1.03. AlbinoLeffe scores 1.30 and allows 1.37. Games in this league average 2.28 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 57% of Inter II's games and 60% of AlbinoLeffe's. The Over 2.5 rates are 37% and 53%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Inter II has the higher season xG average, 1.46 to 1.33 per game. Inter II takes 11.8 shots per game, while AlbinoLeffe takes 10.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Inter II leads at halftime in 37% of its games and scores 0.47 goals per game after halftime. AlbinoLeffe leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.70 after halftime.
When the teams score
Inter II's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (8 goals). For AlbinoLeffe, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie C Group A games average 2.28 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis indicates a balanced rivalry with a lean towards a draw. Inter II presents poor form in home matches with 57% draws and just 14% wins, recording four draws in their last five meetings. AlbinoLeffe also has a high tendency to draw on the road (50%) but has better overall form (1.6 PPG vs 0.8 PPG). The hosts have a slight advantage in expected goals (xG 1.62 vs 1.17), yet a low conversion rate (6% vs 12% for the visitors). Both teams show a similar percentage of clean sheets (36%), suggesting a defensive balance. Taking into account the hosts' poor form in recent matches and the tendency of both teams to draw, the most likely result is a share of the points.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Inter II | AlbinoLeffe | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
AlbinoLeffe is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Inter II · 1.6 pts / game - AlbinoLeffe
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
AlbinoLeffe is 15% better for: goals scored per game.
1.13 goals / game - Inter II · 1.3 goals / game - AlbinoLeffe
Inter II is 33% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.03 goals / game - Inter II · 1.37 goals / game - AlbinoLeffe
Inter II scores in 73% of games (22 of 30 meczów), while AlbinoLeffe keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 meczów).
AlbinoLeffe scores in 77% of games (23 of 30 meczów), while Inter II keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Inter II
Over / Under - AlbinoLeffe
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Inter II is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / game - Inter II · 1.17 pts / game - AlbinoLeffe
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Inter II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 33%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
AlbinoLeffe - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Inter II
AlbinoLeffe
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group A).
Teams vs league
| Inter II | Liga | AlbinoLeffe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.17 | 2.28 | ▲ 2.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 49% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 37% | 41% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 27% | 30% | ▼ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 73% | 66% | • 67% |
| Goal after half-time | • 73% | 72% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Inter II's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against AlbinoLeffe. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Inter II vs AlbinoLeffe?
The Serie C Group A match finished Inter II 0:1 AlbinoLeffe. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Inter II vs AlbinoLeffe?
Inter II score 1.13 goals per game on average and AlbinoLeffe 1.30. The Serie C Group A average is 2.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Inter II's matches and 60% of AlbinoLeffe's.
What form are Inter II and AlbinoLeffe in?
Over the last 5 games Inter II have a 0-4-1 record (0.80 points per game) and AlbinoLeffe 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter II vs AlbinoLeffe?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Inter II vs AlbinoLeffe: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.