Inter Milan vs Roma: match statistics
Inter Milan vs Roma: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Inter Milan played against Roma in Serie A (Italy). The game was played on April 5, 2026. Final score: 5:2.
Recent form
Inter Milan has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Roma has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Inter Milan scores 2.20 goals per game and allows 0.80. Roma scores 1.33 and allows 0.77. Games in this league average 2.44 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of Inter Milan's games and 33% of Roma's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 33%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Inter Milan has the higher season xG average, 2.01 to 1.54 per game. Inter Milan takes 18.0 shots per game, while Roma takes 13.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Inter Milan leads at halftime in 57% of its games and scores 1.23 goals per game after halftime. Roma leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
Inter Milan's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (17 goals). For Roma, it is minutes 61-75 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Serie A games average 2.44 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Inter, the league leader, averages 2.6 goals per home match with xG 2.13 and 7 shots on target, while Roma average 1.13 goals away with xG 1.31 and 4 shots on target. Hosts concede 0.87 goals at home versus Roma’s 0.93 away and keep 40% clean sheets compared to the visitors’ 33%, with Inter’s shot conversion at 14% versus 10% for Roma. In the last 5 matches Inter scored 4 goals and has a record of 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, averaging 1.2 points per game, whereas Roma scored 7 goals but lost 3 of the last 5 and average 0.8 points per game, conceding 9 goals in that period. Inter also dominates possession (60% vs 55%) and win 73% of home matches versus Roma’s 47% away win rate, giving the hosts a clear edge. Considering these figures, I assess the probability at 65% for Inter, 20% for a draw and 15% for Roma.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Analysis based on xG and shots indicates a moderate advantage for the BTTS - Yes scenario: Inter’s home xG is 1.77 versus Roma’s xG against them 1.33, yielding an expected value for Inter of about 1.55 goals, while Roma’s xG is 1.31 versus xG against Inter 0.97 giving Roma about 1.14; from these values the probability Inter scores ≥1 is ~79% and Roma ≥1 is ~68%, which under independence implies ~54% for BTTS. However, Inter concedes only 0.6 goals per match season-to-date and has 53% of matches with a clean sheet, while their season BTTS rate is just 27%, which materially reduces the chance of both teams scoring. Roma in the last 5 matches has 80% BTTS, scoring on average 1.4 and conceding 1.8 (7 for and 9 against), which increases the likelihood they score against Inter. Considering Inter’s xG superiority (1.77 vs 1.31), higher shot volume (15.6 vs 10.8) and season goals average (1.53 vs 1.13), but also their high clean sheet rate, I give a slight edge to the BTTS scenario: 56% Yes vs 44% No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate 1.55 expected goals for Inter (xG attack 1.77 vs xG defense of Roma 1.33 → average 1.55) and 1.14 for Roma (xG attack 1.31 vs xG defense of Inter 0.97 → 1.14), totaling 2.69 expected goals. Inter averages 1.53 scored and concedes 0.60, Roma scores 1.13 and concedes 0.93; with average shots 15.6 vs 10.8 and a conversion rate of 10% this corresponds to roughly 1.56 vs 1.08 goals, confirming Inter’s advantage in chance creation. Season Over2.5 rates are 27% for Inter and 40% for Roma, but the combined xG of 2.69 exceeds the league average of 2.44 and a Poisson model yields ~75% for Over1.5 and ~50% for Over2.5, therefore I assign Over2.5 a moderate edge at ~52%. Over3.5 rates are low (13% for both Inter and Roma) and Inter has 53% clean sheets, so I downgrade the Poisson ~28% for Over3.5 to a conservative ~18%. As a result the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (I assess ~80%), because the expected 2.69 goals, Inter’s xG advantage and the fact both teams have 100% of matches with at least one goal strongly support at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Inter has a clear advantage in attacking metrics and chance creation: on average 1.53 goals scored per match and xG 1.77 versus Roma’s 1.13 and xG 1.31, with 15.6 shots per game compared to the visitors’ 10.8. However, the hosts’ matches are often low-scoring at Half-Time — Inter averages 0.47 goals by the break at home and keeps a clean sheet at Half-Time in 87% of home games, while Roma averages 0.6 goals by the break away, which favors draws after 45 minutes. After the break Inter significantly accelerates: on average 1.07 goals in the second half at home versus Roma’s 0.53 away; 87% of Inter’s home matches see more than 0.5 goals after Half-Time, and Inter wins the second half in 60% of games. From these data the strongest signal is a draw at Half-Time and an Inter turnaround by Full-Time (X/1): the xG advantage 1.77 vs 1.31 and the ability to average 1.07 goals after the break support a reversal after 45 minutes. Therefore I select the X/1 scenario as the most probable HT/FT outcome.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Inter Milan | Roma | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Inter Milan is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Inter Milan · 1.4 pts / game - Roma
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Inter Milan is 65% better for: goals scored per game.
2.2 goals / game - Inter Milan · 1.33 goals / game - Roma
Inter Milan scores in 93% of games (28 of 30 meczów), while Roma keeps a clean sheet in 43% (13 of 30 meczów).
Roma scores in 77% of games (23 of 30 meczów), while Inter Milan keeps a clean sheet in 50% (15 of 30 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Inter Milan
Over / Under - Roma
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Inter Milan is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - Inter Milan · 1.63 pts / game - Roma
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Inter Milan - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 57% of games and wins 73%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Roma - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (17 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Inter Milan
Roma
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).
Teams vs league
| Inter Milan | Liga | Roma | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 2.44 | ▼ 2.10 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 43% | 47% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 47% | ▼ 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 31% | ▲ 43% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 65% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 78% | • 77% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Inter Milan's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Roma. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Inter Milan vs Roma?
The Serie A match finished Inter Milan 5:2 Roma. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Inter Milan vs Roma?
Inter Milan score 2.20 goals per game on average and Roma 1.33. The Serie A average is 2.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Inter Milan's matches and 33% of Roma's.
What form are Inter Milan and Roma in?
Over the last 5 games Inter Milan have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Roma 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter Milan vs Roma?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


