Finland - VeikkausliigaVeritas StadionData current as of September 06, 2026

Inter Turku vs Gnistan: match statistics

Inter Turku crest
Inter Turku
1 : 2half-time 0:2
Gnistan crest
Gnistan

Inter Turku vs Gnistan: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Inter Turku played against Gnistan in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The game was played on July 26, 2026. Venue: Veritas Stadion. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Inter Turku has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Gnistan has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Inter Turku scores 1.44 goals per game and allows 0.75. Gnistan scores 1.56 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 2.68 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Inter Turku's games and 44% of Gnistan's. The Over 2.5 rates are 31% and 38%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Inter Turku has the higher season xG average, 1.61 to 1.42 per game. Inter Turku takes 13.6 shots per game, while Gnistan takes 12.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Inter Turku leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.69 goals per game after halftime. Gnistan leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.94 after halftime.

When the teams score

Inter Turku's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). For Gnistan, it is minutes 61-75 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Veikkausliiga games average 2.68 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Inter Turku (2nd) is unbeaten at home (0% losses) with a home record of 50% wins and 50% draws; in the last 5 matches they scored 8 goals and average 2.2 points per match (3 wins, 2 draws). At home Inter averages 1.13 goals scored and concedes only 0.5 goals per match, registering xG 1.76 and 5.13 shots on target with 60% possession. Gnistan (6th) away has only 25% wins, 38% draws and 38% losses, scores on average 1.0 goal with xG 1.22 and 3.38 shots on target, and in 38% of away matches fails to score. Although Gnistan has higher shot conversion (10% vs 8%), the lower number of shots on target and higher away xG against (1.51 vs Inter xG against 0.77) indicate greater defensive issues. Given Inter’s advantage in quality of chances (xG 1.76 vs 1.22), shots on target (5.13 vs 3.38) and superior home defense (0.5 conceded vs Gnistan 0.88 conceded away), I predict a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Inter Turku at home averages 2.13 goals scored and concedes 1.63 per match, while Gnistan as the visitor averages 1.00 scored and concedes 0.88. Inter generates 1.63 xG and 5.25 shots on target per game versus Gnistan’s 1.22 xG and 3.38 SoT, indicating a clear attacking edge for the home side and a higher probability that Inter will score. Conversely, Gnistan fail to score in 38% of matches, and Inter fail to score in 13% of matches, so the risk of a single-team clean sheet (No Goal for the away side) is material and reduces BTTS chances. In the last 5 matches both teams have BTTS in 60% of games and each team has scored 8 goals across those five appearances (1.6 goals per game), which provides a short-term signal in favor of Goal/Goal. A simple aggregation gives roughly 87% probability that Inter will score (100−13) and 62% for Gnistan (100−38), which multiplicatively yields ~54% for BTTS; with additional offensive pressure from Inter I adjust the estimate to 56% for BTTS - Yes versus 44% for BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model yields the following expected goals: Inter Turku xG_for 1.63 and Gnistan xG_against 1.51 – average 1.57 goals for Inter; Gnistan xG_for 1.22 and Inter xG_against 1.39 – average 1.31 goals for the visitors, totaling 2.88 goals. Using a Poisson distribution with λ=2.88, the probability of exceeding 1.5 goals is approximately 78%, exceeding 2.5 about 55%, and 3.5 about 33%. These outcomes align with seasonal metrics: Inter averages 2.13 goals per game and has 88% of matches over 1.5, Gnistan records 75% of such matches, which strengthens the signal for Over 1.5. Although only 13% of Gnistan’s matches finish over 2.5 (Inter 63%), the projected 2.88 goals indicate a moderate edge on Over 2.5, but with lower confidence than Over 1.5. Therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest pick (highest probability ~78%), with Over 2.5 as a secondary option (~55%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Inter Turku has a clear offensive advantage: home goals per season 2.13 versus Gnistan’s 1.00 away goals, xG 1.63 vs 1.22, and 5.25 shots on target versus 3.38; conversion rate 15% vs 10%. Inter wins 63% of home matches while Gnistan wins 25% of away games, which strongly favors the home side. At the same time the first half appears balanced — Inter led at the break in 38% of matches, draw also occurred in 38%, and Gnistan led at the break in 60% of their last five games — so a halftime draw is realistic. The key signal is Inter’s concentration of goals after the break: Inter scored six goals in minutes 46–60 while Gnistan have 0 in that interval; therefore the most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at the break and an Inter turnaround to win (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 2
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

72Possession (%)28
Inter TurkuGnistan
25Shots9
Inter TurkuGnistan
7Shots on target2
Inter TurkuGnistan
2.74xG0.92
Inter TurkuGnistan
4Corners3
Inter TurkuGnistan
94Dangerous attacks30
Inter TurkuGnistan
10Fouls8
Inter TurkuGnistan
2Cards1
Inter TurkuGnistan

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Inter TurkuGnistan
1.44Goals scored / game1.56
Inter TurkuGnistan
0.75Goals allowed / game1.25
Inter TurkuGnistan
57%Average possession44%
Inter TurkuGnistan
4.81Shots on target / game4.31
Inter TurkuGnistan

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.56Shots per game12.38
Inter TurkuGnistan
4.81Shots on target4.31
Inter TurkuGnistan
10.6%Shot conversion12.6%
Inter TurkuGnistan
57%Possession44%
Inter TurkuGnistan
1.61xG for1.42
Inter TurkuGnistan
0.93xG against1.45
Inter TurkuGnistan

Shooting quality

Inter Turku: BalancedGnistan: Counter-attacking
Inter TurkuGnistan
Accuracy (shots on target)35%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Gnistan is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Inter Turku · 1.6 pts / game - Gnistan

Inter Turku
DDDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
50% W44% R6% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-1
1.94 pts / game · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-4-0
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DWWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 0.95BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Gnistan
DDLWW
Season result split
44% W25% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-5
1.56 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWDLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Gnistan is 8% better for: goals scored per game.

1.44 goals / game - Inter Turku · 1.56 goals / game - Gnistan

Inter Turku is 67% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.75 goals / game - Inter Turku · 1.25 goals / game - Gnistan

Inter Turku scoring profile: strong

Inter Turku scores in 75% of games (12 of 16 meczów), while Gnistan keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 meczów).

Gnistan scoring profile: strong

Gnistan scores in 75% of games (12 of 16 meczów), while Inter Turku keeps a clean sheet in 44% (7 of 16 meczów).

23Goals scored (season)25
Inter TurkuGnistan
12Goals conceded (season)20
Inter TurkuGnistan
2.19Average goals per game2.81
Inter TurkuGnistan
6Goals scored (last 5)8
Inter TurkuGnistan
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
Inter TurkuGnistan

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal75%
Inter TurkuGnistan
50%2 goals38%
Inter TurkuGnistan
19%3 goals25%
Inter TurkuGnistan
0%4 goals13%
Inter TurkuGnistan

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal69%
Inter TurkuGnistan
13%2 goals31%
Inter TurkuGnistan
6%3 goals13%
Inter TurkuGnistan
0%4 goals6%
Inter TurkuGnistan

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time19%
Inter TurkuGnistan
6%BTTS in both halves6%
Inter TurkuGnistan
25%Scored in both halves38%
Inter TurkuGnistan

BTTS and goal count

31%Min. 3 goals and BTTS19%
Inter TurkuGnistan
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
Inter TurkuGnistan
40%BTTS - last 560%
Inter TurkuGnistan

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Inter TurkuGnistan
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Inter TurkuGnistan
19%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Inter TurkuGnistan

2nd half

63%Min. 1 goal after half-time94%
Inter TurkuGnistan
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Inter TurkuGnistan
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Inter TurkuGnistan

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Inter Turku - half-time state
38% leading44% draw19% trailing
Gnistan - half-time state
38% leading38% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per game (1st half)1.5
Inter TurkuGnistan
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.63
Inter TurkuGnistan
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
Inter TurkuGnistan
1.19Average goals (1st half)1.06
Inter TurkuGnistan
56%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Inter TurkuGnistan
56%No goal before half-time44%
Inter TurkuGnistan

After half-time (2nd half)

1.63Points per game (2nd half)1.63
Inter TurkuGnistan
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.94
Inter TurkuGnistan
0.31Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
Inter TurkuGnistan
1Average goals (2nd half)1.75
Inter TurkuGnistan
75%Clean sheet after half-time44%
Inter TurkuGnistan
44%No goal after half-time44%
Inter TurkuGnistan

Inter Turku - second-half results

38% W50% R13% P
25
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Gnistan - second-half results

50% W13% R38% P
24
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Inter Turku - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.60
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Gnistan - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.201.40
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.8
Average goals per game1.01.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Inter Turku
ScoredConceded
5
0
0-15
4
5
16-30
3
2
31-45
4
0
46-60
3
2
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Gnistan
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
3
1
16-30
2
5
31-45
6
5
46-60
7
2
61-75
2
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+12%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Inter Turku

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.68
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
66%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.54
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

Gnistan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
8% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
8%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

Inter TurkuLigaGnistan
Average goals per game 2.192.68 2.81
Both teams scored 50%53% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 31%47% 38%
Clean sheets 44%27% 31%
Goal before half-time 63%76% 75%
Goal after half-time 63%79% 94%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.68
Average goals per game
53%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / game
1.14
Away goals / game
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defensive advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Inter TurkuRed cardIlari Kangasniemi
  2. GnistanGoalJoakim Latonen
  3. Inter TurkuSubstitutionOn: Alie ContehOff: Janne-Pekka Laine
  4. Inter TurkuGoalAlie Conteh
  5. Inter TurkuSubstitutionOn: Jussi NiskaOff: Seth Saarinen
  6. GnistanYellow cardSaku Ylätupa
  7. GnistanSubstitutionOn: Benjamin DahlströmOff: Edmund Arko-Mensah
  8. Inter TurkuSubstitutionOn: Vincent UlunduOff: Clinton Jephta
  9. GnistanSubstitutionOn: Sergei EremenkoOff: Saku Ylätupa

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Inter Turku's perspective: 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Gnistan. Games average 2.80 goals, and both teams scored in 40% of them.

Gnistan
2 : 0
Inter Turku
FC Inter Turku
2 : 1
IF Gnistan
IF Gnistan
0 : 2
FC Inter Turku
IF Gnistan
2 : 2
FC Inter Turku
FC Inter Turku
3 : 0
IF Gnistan

FAQ

What was the result of Inter Turku vs Gnistan?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Inter Turku 1:2 Gnistan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Inter Turku and Gnistan?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Inter Turku won 3, Gnistan won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Inter Turku vs Gnistan?

Inter Turku score 1.44 goals per game on average and Gnistan 1.56. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Inter Turku's matches and 44% of Gnistan's.

What form are Inter Turku and Gnistan in?

Over the last 5 games Inter Turku have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Gnistan 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter Turku vs Gnistan?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Inter Turku vs Gnistan: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.