Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of September 06, 2026

Inter Turku vs Jaro: match statistics

Inter Turku crest
Inter Turku
2 : 0half-time 2:0
Jaro crest
Jaro

Inter Turku vs Jaro: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Inter Turku played against Jaro in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The game was played on May 9, 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Inter Turku has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Jaro has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Inter Turku scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 0.67. Jaro scores 0.80 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.20 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 33% of Inter Turku's games and 60% of Jaro's. The Over 2.5 rates are 17% and 20%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 34% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Inter Turku has the higher season xG average, 1.77 to 1.52 per game. Inter Turku takes 14.0 shots per game, while Jaro takes 12.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Inter Turku leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.83 goals per game after halftime. Jaro leads at halftime in 40% and scores 0.20 after halftime.

When the teams score

Inter Turku's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For Jaro, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Veikkausliiga games average 2.20 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 34% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Inter Turku holds a clear advantage in control and quality of chances: at home they average 62% possession and 1.91 xG per match, while Jaro away records 44% possession and 1.89 xG. The hosts are more clinical and defensively solid — Inter at home scores on average 1.0 goal with shot conversion around 7% and 6.25 shots on target, while conceding only 0.5 goals with 0.54 xG against. The visitors are less efficient offensively on the road: Jaro averages 0.5 goals per match with 3% conversion despite 6.5 shots on target and have 50% of away matches without a goal. In the last 5 matches Inter have a record of 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, averaging 2 points per game, while Jaro have 2 wins and 3 draws (1.8 points on average) and 8 goals scored; additionally Jaro have 100% draws away and Inter are unbeaten at home (0% losses). Considering better game control, higher home xG and lower xG against for Inter, I tip the home win, while noting a significant risk of a draw due to Jaro’s defensive approach away.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Inter Turku has a season BTTS rate of 67% and 0% home clean sheets, averaging 1.0 goals scored and 1.33 conceded per match, indicating the home side regularly concedes. Jaro has a season BTTS of 50% and 50% away clean sheets, but in the last 5 matches their BTTS is 80% and they scored 8 goals in the last 5 (1.6 avg), so their recent offensive form is better. In chance creation Jaro posts xG 1.89 with 16.5 shots and 6.5 on target per match, while Inter at home has xG against 1.19 with 9.0 shots and 3.67 on target, so Jaro clearly generates more opportunities. Counterarguments are Jaro’s low season conversion rate of 3% and season away goal average 0.5, and Inter’s BTTS in the last 5 at only 40%, which weakens the signal; nevertheless the aggregate signals (Inter 67% season BTTS and no home clean sheets, plus Jaro’s good form) favor both teams scoring. I estimate BTTS probability at ~65% for Yes and 35% for No, therefore I recommend a 'Yes' (BTTS - Yes) bet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model based on xG and opponent defense estimates total expected goals at 2.82 (Inter Turku 1.28 vs Jaro 1.54), which clearly exceeds the 1.5 line and is above the 2.5 threshold. This season Inter records 67% of matches with over 1.5 goals, Jaro 50%, and in the last 5 fixtures both teams averaged 2.8 goals combined (Inter 6 and Jaro 8 in the last 5), increasing the likelihood of at least two goals. Jaro generates 1.89 xG and averages 6.5 SOT per match, Inter has 1.28 xG and 3.67 SOT, however Inter is more efficient (shot conversion 11% vs 3% for Jaro), which offsets the visitors’ higher volume. Inter has not kept a clean sheet yet (0% CS), and BTTS is 67% for Inter and 50% for Jaro, so both teams have a real chance to score. As a result I recommend the over market, with the strongest data signal at the 1.5 line (approx. 82% over); Over 2.5 remains moderately likely (~60%), while Over 3.5 is unlikely (~22%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

First-half statistics clearly favor the visitors: Jaro led at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches (80%) and scored 7 goals in first halves over that span, and they have not conceded a first-half goal this season (100% HT clean sheets). Nevertheless, Inter Turku shows superior full-time form — they have won 3 of their last 5 matches (60%) and average 1.2 goals across those five, while Jaro have a 40% win rate in their last 5. The visitors generate more chances (xG 1.89 vs 1.28 and 16.5 shots vs 9.0 for the hosts), but the hosts are markedly more efficient in front of goal (conversion 11% vs 3%). This aligns to a scenario where Jaro is most likely to take a lead at the break, whereas Inter possess the tools to engineer a turnaround after the break thanks to higher efficiency and better recent full-time results. For that reason I rate the most probable outcome as Jaro leading at half-time and Inter Turku winning at full-time (HT/FT 2/1) and assign that scenario the highest probability (35%), with significant shares for 2/X (15%) and 2/2 (10%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

57Possession (%)43
Inter TurkuJaro
15Shots9
Inter TurkuJaro
3Shots on target3
Inter TurkuJaro
1.47xG1.05
Inter TurkuJaro
5Corners4
Inter TurkuJaro
44Dangerous attacks37
Inter TurkuJaro
14Fouls11
Inter TurkuJaro
2Cards1
Inter TurkuJaro

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1Goals scored / game0.8
Inter TurkuJaro
0.67Goals allowed / game1
Inter TurkuJaro
60%Average possession47%
Inter TurkuJaro
5.67Shots on target / game4.8
Inter TurkuJaro

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

14Shots per game12
Inter TurkuJaro
5.67Shots on target4.8
Inter TurkuJaro
7.1%Shot conversion6.7%
Inter TurkuJaro
60%Possession47%
Inter TurkuJaro
1.77xG for1.52
Inter TurkuJaro
0.67xG against1.22
Inter TurkuJaro

Shooting quality

Inter Turku: DominantJaro: Balanced
Inter TurkuJaro
Accuracy (shots on target)41%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.180.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Inter Turku is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Inter Turku · 0.8 pts / game - Jaro

Inter Turku
WWWDL
Season result split
50% W33% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-1
1.83 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-0
Last 5 at home
2-2-0
DWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 0.75BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Jaro
LDDDD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W80% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-0
Last 5 away
0-2-0
DD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Inter Turku is 25% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - Inter Turku · 0.8 goals / game - Jaro

Inter Turku is 49% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.67 goals / game - Inter Turku · 1 goals / game - Jaro

Inter Turku scoring profile: very strong

Inter Turku scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 meczów), while Jaro keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 meczów).

Jaro scoring profile: mixed

Jaro scores in 60% of games (3 of 5 meczów), while Inter Turku keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 meczów).

6Goals scored (season)4
Inter TurkuJaro
4Goals conceded (season)5
Inter TurkuJaro
1.67Average goals per game1.8
Inter TurkuJaro
6Goals scored (last 5)4
Inter TurkuJaro
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
Inter TurkuJaro

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal60%
Inter TurkuJaro
33%2 goals20%
Inter TurkuJaro
0%3 goals0%
Inter TurkuJaro
0%4 goals0%
Inter TurkuJaro

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal80%
Inter TurkuJaro
17%2 goals20%
Inter TurkuJaro
0%3 goals0%
Inter TurkuJaro
0%4 goals0%
Inter TurkuJaro

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time20%
Inter TurkuJaro
0%BTTS in both halves20%
Inter TurkuJaro
0%Scored in both halves20%
Inter TurkuJaro

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
Inter TurkuJaro
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Inter TurkuJaro
40%BTTS - last 560%
Inter TurkuJaro

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Inter TurkuJaro
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
Inter TurkuJaro
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Inter TurkuJaro

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
Inter TurkuJaro
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
Inter TurkuJaro
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Inter TurkuJaro

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Jaro is 139% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.67 pts / game - Inter Turku · 1.6 pts / game - Jaro

Inter Turku - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing
Jaro - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.67Points per game (1st half)1.6
Inter TurkuJaro
0.17Goals scored (1st half)0.6
Inter TurkuJaro
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
Inter TurkuJaro
0.67Average goals (1st half)1
Inter TurkuJaro
50%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Inter TurkuJaro
83%No goal before half-time40%
Inter TurkuJaro

After half-time (2nd half)

1.83Points per game (2nd half)0.6
Inter TurkuJaro
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.2
Inter TurkuJaro
0.17Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
Inter TurkuJaro
1Average goals (2nd half)0.8
Inter TurkuJaro
83%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Inter TurkuJaro
50%No goal after half-time80%
Inter TurkuJaro

Inter Turku - second-half results

50% W33% R17% P
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Jaro - second-half results

0% W60% R40% P
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Inter Turku - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.602.00
Goals scored / game0.21.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.2
Average goals per game0.81.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Jaro - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.60
Goals scored / game0.60.2
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game1.00.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Inter Turku
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Jaro
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.74
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
79%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+44%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Inter Turku

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.77
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Jaro

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.72
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

Inter TurkuLigaJaro
Average goals per game 1.672.20 1.80
Both teams scored 33%46% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 17%34% 20%
Clean sheets 50%31% 20%
Goal before half-time 50%74% 80%
Goal after half-time 67%74% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.20
Average goals per game
46%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.23
Home goals / game
0.97
Away goals / game
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defensive advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Inter TurkuGoalClinton JephtaAssist: Johannes Yli-Kokko
  2. Inter TurkuSubstitutionOn: Luka KuittinenOff: Juuso Hämäläinen
  3. JaroSubstitutionOn: Rudi VikströmOff: Linus Zetterström
  4. JaroYellow cardRudi Vikström
  5. Inter TurkuSubstitutionOn: Kouame Jean Fiacre BotueOff: Alie Conteh
  6. JaroSubstitutionOn: Joas VikströmOff: Mats Pedersen
  7. Inter TurkuYellow cardClinton Jephta
  8. Inter TurkuSubstitutionOn: Julius TauriainenOff: Jussi Niska
  9. Inter TurkuYellow cardProsper Ahiabu

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Inter Turku's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Jaro. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

FC Inter Turku
3 : 1
FF Jaro
FF Jaro
0 : 1
FC Inter Turku

FAQ

What was the result of Inter Turku vs Jaro?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Inter Turku 2:0 Jaro. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Inter Turku and Jaro?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Inter Turku won 2, Jaro won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Inter Turku vs Jaro?

Inter Turku score 1.00 goals per game on average and Jaro 0.80. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Inter Turku's matches and 60% of Jaro's.

What form are Inter Turku and Jaro in?

Over the last 5 games Inter Turku have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Jaro 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter Turku vs Jaro?

The statistical background for Inter Turku vs Jaro — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.