Inter vs Cacahuatique: match statistics
Cacahuatique displays significantly better form and statistics in away matches than Inter does at home. The visitors boast an impressive 50% away win rate and a positive goal difference (+3), while the hosts have won only 17% of their home games with a negative balance (-2). Cacahuatique averages 1.5 goals per away match with a higher shot conversion rate (18% vs 15%) and performs better in maintaining clean sheets (36% vs 25%). Form over the last five matches also favors the visitors (1.4 PPG vs 0.8 PPG), making them the favorite for this encounter. Cacahuatique's advantage in key offensive and defensive statistics suggests a probable victory for the away team.
Inter vs Cacahuatique: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Inter played against Cacahuatique in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on January 24, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Inter has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Cacahuatique has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Inter scores 1.09 goals per game and allows 1.59. Cacahuatique scores 1.30 and allows 1.44. Games in this league average 2.74 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 59% of Inter's games and 59% of Cacahuatique's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 67%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Cacahuatique has the higher season xG average, 1.35 to 1.21 per game. Inter takes 7.0 shots per game, while Cacahuatique takes 8.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Inter leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.59 goals per game after halftime. Cacahuatique leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.59 after halftime.
When the teams score
Inter's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). For Cacahuatique, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.74 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Cacahuatique displays significantly better form and statistics in away matches than Inter does at home. The visitors boast an impressive 50% away win rate and a positive goal difference (+3), while the hosts have won only 17% of their home games with a negative balance (-2). Cacahuatique averages 1.5 goals per away match with a higher shot conversion rate (18% vs 15%) and performs better in maintaining clean sheets (36% vs 25%). Form over the last five matches also favors the visitors (1.4 PPG vs 0.8 PPG), making them the favorite for this encounter. Cacahuatique's advantage in key offensive and defensive statistics suggests a probable victory for the away team.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Inter | Cacahuatique | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 49% | 48% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Cacahuatique is 75% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Inter · 1.4 pts / game - Cacahuatique
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cacahuatique is 19% better for: goals scored per game.
1.09 goals / game - Inter · 1.3 goals / game - Cacahuatique
Cacahuatique is 10% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.59 goals / game - Inter · 1.44 goals / game - Cacahuatique
Inter scores in 68% of games (15 of 22 games), while Cacahuatique keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 games).
Cacahuatique scores in 78% of games (21 of 27 games), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Inter
Over / Under - Cacahuatique
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Cacahuatique is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.14 pts / game - Inter · 1.33 pts / game - Cacahuatique
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Inter - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 14%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Cacahuatique - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Inter
Cacahuatique
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Inter | Liga | Cacahuatique | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.68 | 2.74 | • 2.74 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 59% | 56% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 53% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 26% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | • 68% | 69% | • 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 77% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- InterGoalEmerson Saúl Mauricio Aquino
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Inter's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Cacahuatique. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Inter vs Cacahuatique?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Inter 2:1 Cacahuatique. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Inter vs Cacahuatique?
Inter score 1.09 goals per game on average and Cacahuatique 1.30. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Inter's matches and 59% of Cacahuatique's.
What form are Inter and Cacahuatique in?
Over the last 5 games Inter have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Cacahuatique 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter vs Cacahuatique?
The statistical background for Inter vs Cacahuatique — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.