El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of September 06, 2026

Inter vs CD Platense: match statistics

Inter crest
Inter
0 : 0half-time 0:0
CD Platense crest
CD Platense
150%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
220%(0.00)

Inter shows a clear advantage in recent form, earning 2 points per game in the last 5 matches and recording a streak of 3 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss. CD Platense is experiencing a form crisis with just 0.6 points per game and a record of 1 win and 4 losses in their last 5 matches. The hosts have a better goal difference at home (-1) compared to the visitors away (-9), as well as higher possession (54% vs 46%). CD Platense fails to score in 43% of away matches and concedes an average of 1.79 goals per match, which, given their poor form, makes them very vulnerable to defeat. Considering all statistics, Inter has solid chances for a victory, although their own instability in home matches (only 23% win rate) suggests that a draw is also possible.

Inter vs CD Platense: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Inter played against CD Platense in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on February 4, 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Inter has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. CD Platense has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Inter scores 1.16 goals per game and allows 1.48. CD Platense scores 1.29 and allows 1.57. Games in this league average 2.74 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of Inter's games and 61% of CD Platense's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 50%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

CD Platense has the higher season xG average, 1.21 to 1.20 per game. Inter takes 7.0 shots per game, while CD Platense takes 8.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Inter leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.68 goals per game after halftime. CD Platense leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.68 after halftime.

When the teams score

Inter's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). For CD Platense, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.74 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Inter shows a clear advantage in recent form, earning 2 points per game in the last 5 matches and recording a streak of 3 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss. CD Platense is experiencing a form crisis with just 0.6 points per game and a record of 1 win and 4 losses in their last 5 matches. The hosts have a better goal difference at home (-1) compared to the visitors away (-9), as well as higher possession (54% vs 46%). CD Platense fails to score in 43% of away matches and concedes an average of 1.79 goals per match, which, given their poor form, makes them very vulnerable to defeat. Considering all statistics, Inter has solid chances for a victory, although their own instability in home matches (only 23% win rate) suggests that a draw is also possible.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

70Possession (%)30
InterCD Platense
15Shots6
InterCD Platense
4Shots on target2
InterCD Platense
1.71xG0.72
InterCD Platense
10Corners3
InterCD Platense
67Dangerous attacks28
InterCD Platense
20Fouls12
InterCD Platense
0Cards0
InterCD Platense

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.16Goals scored / game1.29
InterCD Platense
1.48Goals allowed / game1.57
InterCD Platense
52%Average possession47%
InterCD Platense
3.48Shots on target / game3.68
InterCD Platense

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7Shots per game8.21
InterCD Platense
3.48Shots on target3.68
InterCD Platense
16.6%Shot conversion15.7%
InterCD Platense
52%Possession47%
InterCD Platense
1.2xG for1.21
InterCD Platense
1.23xG against1.33
InterCD Platense

Shooting quality

Inter: Efficient finishingCD Platense: Counter-attacking
InterCD Platense
Accuracy (shots on target)50%45%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Inter is 233% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Inter · 0.6 pts / game - CD Platense

Inter
LWWWD
Season result split
20% W40% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-10-10
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-6-4
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DLDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
CD Platense
LLWLL
Season result split
21% W39% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-11-11
1.04 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-7
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DLLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.75BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CD Platense is 11% better for: goals scored per game.

1.16 goals / game - Inter · 1.29 goals / game - CD Platense

Inter is 6% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.48 goals / game - Inter · 1.57 goals / game - CD Platense

Inter scoring profile: very strong

Inter scores in 68% of games (17 of 25 meczów), while CD Platense keeps a clean sheet in 18% (5 of 28 meczów).

CD Platense scoring profile: very strong

CD Platense scores in 68% of games (19 of 28 meczów), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 20% (5 of 25 meczów).

29Goals scored (season)36
InterCD Platense
37Goals conceded (season)44
InterCD Platense
2.64Average goals per game2.86
InterCD Platense
9Goals scored (last 5)6
InterCD Platense
5Goals conceded (last 5)15
InterCD Platense

How often they score at least...

68%1 goal68%
InterCD Platense
40%2 goals36%
InterCD Platense
8%3 goals21%
InterCD Platense
0%4 goals4%
InterCD Platense

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal82%
InterCD Platense
52%2 goals39%
InterCD Platense
16%3 goals18%
InterCD Platense
0%4 goals11%
InterCD Platense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time21%
InterCD Platense
8%BTTS in both halves7%
InterCD Platense
16%Scored in both halves14%
InterCD Platense

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
InterCD Platense
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
InterCD Platense
60%BTTS - last 560%
InterCD Platense

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
InterCD Platense
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
InterCD Platense
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
InterCD Platense

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time71%
InterCD Platense
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time54%
InterCD Platense
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
InterCD Platense

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Inter - half-time state
20% leading52% draw28% trailing
CD Platense - half-time state
21% leading50% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.12Points per game (1st half)1.14
InterCD Platense
0.48Goals scored (1st half)0.61
InterCD Platense
0.64Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
InterCD Platense
1.12Average goals (1st half)1.25
InterCD Platense
52%Clean sheet before half-time50%
InterCD Platense
60%No goal before half-time61%
InterCD Platense

After half-time (2nd half)

1.24Points per game (2nd half)0.93
InterCD Platense
0.68Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
InterCD Platense
0.84Goals conceded (2nd half)0.93
InterCD Platense
1.52Average goals (2nd half)1.61
InterCD Platense
40%Clean sheet after half-time43%
InterCD Platense
56%No goal after half-time57%
InterCD Platense

Inter - second-half results

32% W28% R40% P
28
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

CD Platense - second-half results

14% W50% R36% P
32
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 21%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Inter - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.60
Goals scored / game1.00.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game1.41.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
CD Platense - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.00
Goals scored / game1.00.2
Goals allowed / game0.82.2
Average goals per game1.82.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Inter
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
1
7
16-30
8
7
31-45
9
5
46-60
2
7
61-75
6
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

CD Platense
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
6
6
16-30
8
7
31-45
6
6
46-60
7
10
61-75
6
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+45%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
46%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Inter

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+1.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

CD Platense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
94%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

InterLigaCD Platense
Average goals per game 2.642.74 2.86
Both teams scored 60%57% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%53% 50%
Clean sheets 20%26% 18%
Goal before half-time 64%69% 68%
Goal after half-time 80%77% 71%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.74
Average goals per game
57%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / game
1.37
Away goals / game
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Filiberto MartinezMatches officiated: 12
-Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 242%Home wins33%Draws25%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Inter's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against CD Platense. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

CD Platense
2 : 2
Inter
Inter
2 : 2
CD Platense

FAQ

What was the result of Inter vs CD Platense?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Inter 0:0 CD Platense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Inter and CD Platense?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Inter won 0, CD Platense won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Inter vs CD Platense?

Inter score 1.16 goals per game on average and CD Platense 1.29. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Inter's matches and 61% of CD Platense's.

What form are Inter and CD Platense in?

Over the last 5 games Inter have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and CD Platense 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter vs CD Platense?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Inter vs CD Platense: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.