Inter vs FAS: match statistics
Inter vs FAS: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Inter play FAS in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The match date is 15 April 2026 at 02:00. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Inter: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. FAS: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Inter scores 1.13 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. FAS scores 2.10 and concedes 0.92. League average: 2.67 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Inter 51%, FAS 52%. Over 2.5: Inter 53%, FAS 52%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
FAS has higher xG: 1.53 vs 1.25. Inter: 7.8 shots per match, FAS: 11.0.
Match halves
Inter: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.64. FAS: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 1.12.
Goals by minute
Inter: 31-45+ (13 goals). FAS: 76-90+ (30 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Salvadoran Primera División: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
3 H2H matches: 0-0-3. Average goals 3.33, BTTS 67%.
Match description
FAS is the favorite due to a clear offensive advantage and form: the visitors average 2.09 goals away, have xG 1.52 and 95 goals this season, while Inter at home records 1.15 goals per game, xG 1.21 and 44 goals. In the last 5 matches FAS won 4 times and scored 13 goals (2.6 per game), whereas Inter has only 1 win, scored 4 and conceded 11 (2.2 per game), indicating defensive issues for the hosts. The visitors create more chances – on average 5.1 shots on target and 10.33 shots per away match versus 3.45 and 7.6 for Inter at home – and with a conversion rate of 21% vs 15% they have a higher likelihood of capitalizing on opportunities. Additionally, FAS has a 50% away win rate compared to Inter’s 35% home win rate and averages 2.4 points in the last 5 matches versus Inter’s 1.0 point, therefore I forecast an away victory.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Inter | FAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 46% | 45% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Inter is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Inter · 1.6 pts / match - FAS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FAS is 86% better for: goals scored per match.
1.13 goals / match - Inter · 2.1 goals / match - FAS
FAS is 52% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.4 goals / match - Inter · 0.92 goals / match - FAS
Inter scores in 64% of matches (29 of 45 matches), while FAS keeps a clean sheet in 38% (20 of 52 matches).
FAS scores in 88% of matches (46 of 52 matches), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 27% (12 of 45 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Inter
Over / Under — FAS
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FAS is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.18 pts / match - Inter · 1.73 pts / match - FAS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Inter - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
FAS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (30 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +20 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Inter
FAS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Inter | Liga | FAS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.53 | 2.67 | ▲ 3.02 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 51% | 53% | • 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 50% | ▲ 52% |
| Clean sheets | • 27% | 27% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 60% | 68% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | • 78% | 78% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Inter 0 - 0 - 3 FAS. Average goals 3.33, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Inter vs FAS?
The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Inter 2:2 FAS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Inter and FAS?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Inter won 0, FAS won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Inter vs FAS?
Inter score 1.13 goals per game on average and FAS 2.10. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 51% of Inter's matches and 52% of FAS's.
What form are Inter and FAS in?
Over the last 5 games Inter have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and FAS 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter vs FAS?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.