El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of September 20, 2026

Inter vs Fuerte San Francisco: match statistics

Inter crest
Inter
2 : 0half-time 2:0
Fuerte San Francisco crest
Fuerte San Francisco
135%(0.00)
X40%(0.00)
225%(0.00)

Statistical analysis indicates a tight contest with a draw being the most likely scenario. Inter exhibits poor home form with a mere 9% win rate and a staggering 55% draw rate on home turf, averaging a loss of momentum with 0.2 points per game in their last five outings. Fuerte San Francisco demonstrates more stability, averaging 1.2 points per game in their last five matches, alongside a superior away record (27% win rate). The hosts possess better average possession (53% vs 43%) and slightly higher xG figures (1.20 vs 1.34), yet the high frequency of draws at home (55%) and similar goals-per-match average (2.36 for both sides) suggest an evenly matched encounter. The visitors boast a better clean sheet percentage on the road (36% vs 18% for the hosts), potentially neutralizing Inter's home advantage. Taking all factors into account, a draw appears the most probable outcome, though Inter retains a marginal edge as the home side.

Inter vs Fuerte San Francisco: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Inter played against Fuerte San Francisco in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on January 21, 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Inter has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Fuerte San Francisco has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Inter scores 1.05 goals per game and allows 1.67. Fuerte San Francisco scores 0.91 and allows 1.70. Games in this league average 2.74 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 62% of Inter's games and 48% of Fuerte San Francisco's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 52%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Fuerte San Francisco has the higher season xG average, 1.33 to 1.20 per game. Inter takes 6.9 shots per game, while Fuerte San Francisco takes 9.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Inter leads at halftime in 19% of its games and scores 0.62 goals per game after halftime. Fuerte San Francisco leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.57 after halftime.

When the teams score

Inter's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). For Fuerte San Francisco, it is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.74 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates a tight contest with a draw being the most likely scenario. Inter exhibits poor home form with a mere 9% win rate and a staggering 55% draw rate on home turf, averaging a loss of momentum with 0.2 points per game in their last five outings. Fuerte San Francisco demonstrates more stability, averaging 1.2 points per game in their last five matches, alongside a superior away record (27% win rate). The hosts possess better average possession (53% vs 43%) and slightly higher xG figures (1.20 vs 1.34), yet the high frequency of draws at home (55%) and similar goals-per-match average (2.36 for both sides) suggest an evenly matched encounter. The visitors boast a better clean sheet percentage on the road (36% vs 18% for the hosts), potentially neutralizing Inter's home advantage. Taking all factors into account, a draw appears the most probable outcome, though Inter retains a marginal edge as the home side.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

57Possession (%)43
InterFuerte San Francisco
9Shots8
InterFuerte San Francisco
3Shots on target2
InterFuerte San Francisco
1.38xG1.1
InterFuerte San Francisco
4Corners6
InterFuerte San Francisco
82Dangerous attacks62
InterFuerte San Francisco
11Fouls10
InterFuerte San Francisco
0Cards0
InterFuerte San Francisco

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

InterFuerte San Francisco
1.05Goals scored / game0.91
InterFuerte San Francisco
1.67Goals allowed / game1.7
InterFuerte San Francisco
52%Average possession45%
InterFuerte San Francisco
3.43Shots on target / game4.17
InterFuerte San Francisco

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

6.9Shots per game9.74
InterFuerte San Francisco
3.43Shots on target4.17
InterFuerte San Francisco
15.2%Shot conversion9.4%
InterFuerte San Francisco
52%Possession45%
InterFuerte San Francisco
1.2xG for1.33
InterFuerte San Francisco
1.24xG against1.58
InterFuerte San Francisco

Shooting quality

Inter: Efficient finishingFuerte San Francisco: Balanced
InterFuerte San Francisco
Accuracy (shots on target)50%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Fuerte San Francisco is 500% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / game - Inter · 1.2 pts / game - Fuerte San Francisco

Inter
LLLDL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
10% W43% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-9-10
0.71 pts / game · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-6-4
Last 5 at home
0-3-2
LDDLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Fuerte San Francisco
DDWLD
Season result split
17% W39% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-9-10
0.91 pts / game · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-4
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWDDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.18BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Inter is 15% better for: goals scored per game.

1.05 goals / game - Inter · 0.91 goals / game - Fuerte San Francisco

Inter scoring profile: strong

Inter scores in 67% of games (14 of 21 games), while Fuerte San Francisco keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 games).

Fuerte San Francisco scoring profile: very strong

Fuerte San Francisco scores in 61% of games (14 of 23 games), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 21 games).

22Goals scored (season)21
InterFuerte San Francisco
35Goals conceded (season)39
InterFuerte San Francisco
2.71Average goals per game2.61
InterFuerte San Francisco
4Goals scored (last 5)4
InterFuerte San Francisco
11Goals conceded (last 5)5
InterFuerte San Francisco

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal61%
InterFuerte San Francisco
33%2 goals22%
InterFuerte San Francisco
5%3 goals9%
InterFuerte San Francisco
0%4 goals0%
InterFuerte San Francisco

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal65%
InterFuerte San Francisco
62%2 goals43%
InterFuerte San Francisco
19%3 goals35%
InterFuerte San Francisco
0%4 goals9%
InterFuerte San Francisco

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

48%
Fuerte San Francisco - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.11 of 23 games
56%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time22%
InterFuerte San Francisco
10%BTTS in both halves4%
InterFuerte San Francisco
14%Scored in both halves22%
InterFuerte San Francisco

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
InterFuerte San Francisco
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
InterFuerte San Francisco
60%BTTS - last 560%
InterFuerte San Francisco

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
InterFuerte San Francisco
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time35%
InterFuerte San Francisco
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
InterFuerte San Francisco

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
InterFuerte San Francisco
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time39%
InterFuerte San Francisco
19%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
InterFuerte San Francisco

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Inter is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.05 pts / game - Inter · 0.87 pts / game - Fuerte San Francisco

Inter - half-time state
19% leading48% draw33% trailing
Fuerte San Francisco - half-time state
13% leading48% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.05Points per game (1st half)0.87
InterFuerte San Francisco
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.35
InterFuerte San Francisco
0.71Goals conceded (1st half)0.96
InterFuerte San Francisco
1.14Average goals (1st half)1.3
InterFuerte San Francisco
48%Clean sheet before half-time48%
InterFuerte San Francisco
62%No goal before half-time65%
InterFuerte San Francisco

After half-time (2nd half)

1.1Points per game (2nd half)1.26
InterFuerte San Francisco
0.62Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
InterFuerte San Francisco
0.95Goals conceded (2nd half)0.74
InterFuerte San Francisco
1.57Average goals (2nd half)1.3
InterFuerte San Francisco
33%Clean sheet after half-time57%
InterFuerte San Francisco
57%No goal after half-time52%
InterFuerte San Francisco

Inter - second-half results

29% W24% D48% L
22
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding53%

Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 10%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Fuerte San Francisco - second-half results

30% W35% D35% L
20
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.87
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 17%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Inter - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.40
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game1.60.6
Average goals per game2.01.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet0%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-6-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Fuerte San Francisco - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.20
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game1.00.8
1 goal60%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Inter
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
1
6
16-30
6
7
31-45
7
5
46-60
1
7
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Fuerte San Francisco
ScoredConceded
1
7
0-15
3
7
16-30
4
8
31-45
6
7
46-60
3
4
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Inter

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
121%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Fuerte San Francisco

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

InterLigaFuerte San Francisco
Average goals per game 2.712.74 2.61
Both teams scored 62%56% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%53% 52%
Clean sheets 14%26% 35%
Goal before half-time 67%69% 65%
Goal after half-time 86%78% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.74
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.36
Home goals / game
1.38
Away goals / game
+-1%
Home attack advantage
+-1%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Emerson Saúl Mauricio Aquino⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. InterGoalEmerson Saúl Mauricio Aquino

Head-to-head

Record from Inter's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Fuerte San Francisco. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Fuerte San Francisco
2 : 3
Inter
Inter
0 : 0
Fuerte San Francisco

FAQ

What was the result of Inter vs Fuerte San Francisco?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Inter 2:0 Fuerte San Francisco. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Inter and Fuerte San Francisco?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Inter won 1, Fuerte San Francisco won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Inter vs Fuerte San Francisco?

Inter score 1.05 goals per game on average and Fuerte San Francisco 0.91. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Inter's matches and 48% of Fuerte San Francisco's.

What form are Inter and Fuerte San Francisco in?

Over the last 5 games Inter have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Fuerte San Francisco 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter vs Fuerte San Francisco?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Inter vs Fuerte San Francisco: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.