El Salvador - Salvadoran Primera DivisiónData current as of September 18, 2026

Inter vs Isidro Metapán: match statistics

Inter crest
Inter
2 : 1half-time 2:0
Isidro Metapán crest
Isidro Metapán

Inter vs Isidro Metapán: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Inter played against Isidro Metapán in Salvadoran Primera División (El Salvador). The game was played on April 5, 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Inter has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Isidro Metapán has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Inter scores 1.08 goals per game and allows 1.41. Isidro Metapán scores 1.25 and allows 1.23. Games in this league average 2.71 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 49% of Inter's games and 57% of Isidro Metapán's. The Over 2.5 rates are 51% and 55%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Isidro Metapán has the higher season xG average, 1.30 to 1.24 per game. Inter takes 7.7 shots per game, while Isidro Metapán takes 9.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Inter leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.62 goals per game after halftime. Isidro Metapán leads at halftime in 35% and scores 0.63 after halftime.

When the teams score

Inter's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). For Isidro Metapán, it is minutes 31-45+ (15 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Salvadoran Primera División games average 2.71 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict an Isidro Metapán win as the most likely outcome. The visitors show clearer offensive efficiency: 50 goals scored this season versus Inter’s 40, a higher conversion rate 16% vs 14% and on average 8.35 shots per game versus 7.79 for the hosts; in the last 5 matches Metapán scored 4 goals and averages 1.2 points per game, while Inter has only 2 goals and 1.0 point. Inter does have defensive strengths at home — conceding 1.11 goals per game on average and with xG against 1.02 compared to their own xG 1.23, whereas Metapán concedes 1.3 goals on average away and has xG against 1.49. Despite higher possession for Inter (55% vs 47%) and a better home clean sheet rate (32% vs 15%), the hosts struggle offensively: 32% of home matches without scoring versus 20% for Metapán, and in the last five matches Inter conceded 8 goals. Considering the superior conversion, lower share of scoreless matches and slightly better points form of the visitors, I give them a narrow edge (approx. 42%), with 28% for Inter and 30% for a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes at 62% because Isidro Metapán has 70% of matches this season with both teams scoring versus a league BTTS average of 54%. Inter at home has 45% BTTS this season, but in the last 5 home matches they have 0% BTTS and average only 0.4 goals per game (2 goals in 5), indicating weakened home form. xG metrics favor goals from both sides: Inter xG_for 1.44 against Isidro xG_against 1.49, and Isidro xG_for 1.15 against Inter xG_against 1.10, totaling about 2.59 xG, close to the league average 2.7. Additionally, Inter averages 5.05 on-target shots versus Isidro's 3.6, while Isidro has a higher conversion rate 16% vs 12% and has scored 50 goals this season compared to Inter's 40, suggesting the visitors will find the net. Considering Isidro's low clean sheet percentage (15% vs Inter 40%) and the strong seasonal BTTS signal from the away side, the pick is Yes (62% vs 38%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on xG and seasonal distributions I lean toward Over 1.5: home xG 1.44 and xG against for the visitors 1.49 translate to ~1.47 expected goals for Inter, while visitors’ xG 1.15 with xG against for the home side 1.10 give ~1.13 for Isidro, totaling ~2.60 goals. Seasonally Inter has Over1.5 in 60% of matches, Isidro in 85% (average 72.5%, theoretically 94% assuming independence), which strongly favors at least two goals in the match. Additionally the hosts average 5.05 shots on target versus 3.6 for the visitors, and the percentage of games with Both Teams to Score is 45% for Inter and 70% for Isidro — this increases the risk of goals from both sides. I rate Over2.5 as moderately likely (~58%) given the total xG ≈2.6 and seasonal Over2.5 rates 50%/60%, whereas Over3.5 has low chances (~22%) with seasonal rates 25%/20%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely half-time result is a draw: Inter were level at the break in 10 matches (50%), Isidro in 7 matches (35%), giving an average of around a 43% chance of a draw at half-time. Inter create more attacking opportunities — home xG 1.44 vs 1.15 for Isidro, 5.05 shots on target vs 3.60 and 10.2 shots overall vs 8.35 — which supports a home advantage for the full match. Isidro, however, often lead at the break (9 matches, 45%) and their fixtures end with both teams scoring in 70% of cases, so I expect activity from both sides. In the second half Inter perform better in converting results: the hosts win second halves in 30% of cases versus 15% for Isidro, average points/efficiency in second halves is 1.3 for Inter vs 0.9 for Isidro, and visitors concede on average 0.95 goals after the break compared to 0.65 for the hosts, which increases the hosts’ chance of a turnaround. Therefore my strongest signal is draw at half-time and Inter victory at full-time (X/1) with an assigned probability of about 21%, with other notable options being 2/2 (18%) and 1/1 (15%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

51Possession (%)49
InterIsidro Metapán
4Shots4
InterIsidro Metapán
3Shots on target3
InterIsidro Metapán
0.86xG0.74
InterIsidro Metapán
3Corners5
InterIsidro Metapán
53Dangerous attacks37
InterIsidro Metapán
-1Fouls-1
InterIsidro Metapán
-1Cards-1
InterIsidro Metapán

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

InterIsidro Metapán
1.08Goals scored / game1.25
InterIsidro Metapán
1.41Goals allowed / game1.23
InterIsidro Metapán
53%Average possession50%
InterIsidro Metapán
3.54Shots on target / game4.33
InterIsidro Metapán

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7.7Shots per game9.28
InterIsidro Metapán
3.54Shots on target4.33
InterIsidro Metapán
14%Shot conversion13.5%
InterIsidro Metapán
53%Possession50%
InterIsidro Metapán
1.24xG for1.3
InterIsidro Metapán
1.25xG against1.29
InterIsidro Metapán

Shooting quality

Inter: Efficient finishingIsidro Metapán: Efficient finishing
InterIsidro Metapán
Accuracy (shots on target)46%47%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Isidro Metapán is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Inter · 1.2 pts / game - Isidro Metapán

Inter
WDLLD
Season result split
24% W35% D41% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-13-15
1.08 pts / game · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-7-6
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 40%
Isidro Metapán
LDWDD
Season result split
38% W35% D28% L
Season (W-D-L)
15-14-11
1.48 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
6-8-6
Last 5 away
1-4-0
DDWDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.23BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Isidro Metapán is 16% better for: goals scored per game.

1.08 goals / game - Inter · 1.25 goals / game - Isidro Metapán

Isidro Metapán is 15% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.41 goals / game - Inter · 1.23 goals / game - Isidro Metapán

Inter scoring profile: strong

Inter scores in 62% of games (23 of 37 games), while Isidro Metapán keeps a clean sheet in 28% (11 of 40 games).

Isidro Metapán scoring profile: strong

Isidro Metapán scores in 73% of games (29 of 40 games), while Inter keeps a clean sheet in 30% (11 of 37 games).

40Goals scored (season)50
InterIsidro Metapán
52Goals conceded (season)49
InterIsidro Metapán
2.49Average goals per game2.48
InterIsidro Metapán
2Goals scored (last 5)4
InterIsidro Metapán
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
InterIsidro Metapán

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal73%
InterIsidro Metapán
35%2 goals43%
InterIsidro Metapán
11%3 goals8%
InterIsidro Metapán
0%4 goals3%
InterIsidro Metapán

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal73%
InterIsidro Metapán
46%2 goals40%
InterIsidro Metapán
19%3 goals10%
InterIsidro Metapán
3%4 goals0%
InterIsidro Metapán

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time15%
InterIsidro Metapán
5%BTTS in both halves5%
InterIsidro Metapán
16%Scored in both halves20%
InterIsidro Metapán

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
InterIsidro Metapán
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
InterIsidro Metapán
0%BTTS - last 540%
InterIsidro Metapán

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
InterIsidro Metapán
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time28%
InterIsidro Metapán
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
InterIsidro Metapán

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
InterIsidro Metapán
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
InterIsidro Metapán
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
InterIsidro Metapán

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Isidro Metapán is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.19 pts / game - Inter · 1.48 pts / game - Isidro Metapán

Inter - half-time state
22% leading54% draw24% trailing
Isidro Metapán - half-time state
35% leading43% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.19Points per game (1st half)1.48
InterIsidro Metapán
0.46Goals scored (1st half)0.63
InterIsidro Metapán
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
InterIsidro Metapán
1.05Average goals (1st half)1.05
InterIsidro Metapán
59%Clean sheet before half-time63%
InterIsidro Metapán
65%No goal before half-time55%
InterIsidro Metapán

After half-time (2nd half)

1.19Points per game (2nd half)1.1
InterIsidro Metapán
0.62Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
InterIsidro Metapán
0.81Goals conceded (2nd half)0.8
InterIsidro Metapán
1.43Average goals (2nd half)1.43
InterIsidro Metapán
46%Clean sheet after half-time45%
InterIsidro Metapán
57%No goal after half-time53%
InterIsidro Metapán

Inter - second-half results

30% W30% D41% L
44
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding109%

Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Isidro Metapán - second-half results

23% W43% D35% L
59
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding109%

Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Inter - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.60
Goals scored / game0.40.0
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.20.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Isidro Metapán - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.80
Goals scored / game0.20.6
Goals allowed / game1.00.2
Average goals per game1.20.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Inter
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
1
10
16-30
10
8
31-45
10
7
46-60
5
9
61-75
8
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Isidro Metapán
ScoredConceded
4
7
0-15
6
3
16-30
15
7
31-45
10
9
46-60
4
8
61-75
11
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.49
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+48%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Inter

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.08
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Isidro Metapán

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Salvadoran Primera División).

Teams vs league

InterLigaIsidro Metapán
Average goals per game 2.492.71 2.48
Both teams scored 49%54% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 51%52% 55%
Clean sheets 30%27% 28%
Goal before half-time 57%67% 68%
Goal after half-time 76%78% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.71
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / game
1.34
Away goals / game
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defensive advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Emerson Saúl Mauricio Aquino⚽ 1
Jairo Mauricio Henriquez Ferrufino⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. InterGoalEmerson Saúl Mauricio Aquino

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Ivan BartonMatches officiated: 13
-Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 223%Home wins46%Draws31%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Inter's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 0 losses against Isidro Metapán. Games average 3.67 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

Isidro Metapán
0 : 3
Inter
Inter
2 : 2
Isidro Metapán
Isidro Metapán
2 : 2
Inter

FAQ

What was the result of Inter vs Isidro Metapán?

The Salvadoran Primera División match finished Inter 2:1 Isidro Metapán. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Inter and Isidro Metapán?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Inter won 1, Isidro Metapán won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Inter vs Isidro Metapán?

Inter score 1.08 goals per game on average and Isidro Metapán 1.25. The Salvadoran Primera División average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 49% of Inter's matches and 57% of Isidro Metapán's.

What form are Inter and Isidro Metapán in?

Over the last 5 games Inter have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Isidro Metapán 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Inter vs Isidro Metapán?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.