Ironi Tiberias vs Ashdod: match statistics
Ironi Tiberias vs Ashdod: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Ironi Tiberias played against Ashdod in Israeli Premier League (Israel). The game was played on April 11, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Ironi Tiberias has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Ashdod has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Ironi Tiberias scores 1.28 goals per game and allows 2.08. Ashdod scores 1.28 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 3.09 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 52% of Ironi Tiberias's games and 64% of Ashdod's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 60%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Ashdod has the higher season xG average, 1.36 to 1.31 per game. Ironi Tiberias takes 10.7 shots per game, while Ashdod takes 12.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Ironi Tiberias leads at halftime in 16% of its games and scores 0.84 goals per game after halftime. Ashdod leads at halftime in 16% and scores 0.68 after halftime.
When the teams score
Ironi Tiberias's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Ashdod, it is minutes 31-45+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Israeli Premier League games average 3.09 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (Ironi Tiberias). In their last 5 matches Ironi have a record of 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss and average 1.6 points per game, while Ashdod have lost 5 from 5 and have 0 points in that period. Both teams have 32 goals scored this season, but at home Ironi average 1.42 goals per game with 4.58 shots on target and 11% conversion, whereas Ashdod away average 1.08 goals, 3.92 shots on target and 9% conversion; additionally Ashdod failed to score in 42% of away games versus 17% of matches without a goal for Ironi. Defensively Ashdod have conceded 14 goals in their last 5 matches compared to 9 conceded by Ironi, and seasonally the average goals conceded are 1.75 for the home side and 1.67 for the away side, indicating both teams are vulnerable at the back which could favor multiple goals. Considering the better form of the hosts, higher finishing efficiency and greater number of shots on target and the lower share of scoreless matches (17% vs 42%), I give Ironi Tiberias the greater chance.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for BTTS is that both teams had BTTS in 100% of their last 5 matches (5/5), with season rates of 77% BTTS for Ironi Tiberias vs 50% for Ashdod, against a league average of 59%. Both sides also regularly concede: Ironi concedes 2.31 goals per match season-to-date, Ashdod 1.67, and in the last 5 games Ashdod conceded 2.8 goals per match, increasing the opponent’s scoring likelihood. In attack xG is 1.31 for Ironi and 1.42 for Ashdod, with xG against of 1.73 and 1.56 respectively, so both teams create and allow chances. Additionally, average shots on target 3.62 vs 3.92 and equal 32 goals scored this season demonstrate both teams can find the net; only 8% of Ironi’s matches end in a clean sheet (25% for Ashdod). On this basis I pick BTTS - Yes as the most likely scenario with probability 82% vs 18% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Data indicate clear goal potential: league average goals is 3.09. In their last 5 matches the home side averaged 2.0 scored and 1.8 conceded, while the visitors averaged 1.8 scored and 2.8 conceded; both teams had 100% Over 2.5 in their last 5 games. Ironi averages 11.62 shots (3.62 on target) per match, Ashdod 12.58 (3.92 on target), with conversion rates of 13% for the home side and 9% for the visitors, which increases the likelihood of finishing chances. xG comparison gives expected goals of ≈1.44 for Ironi (home xG 1.31 vs xG against Ashdod 1.56) and ≈1.58 for Ashdod (away xG 1.42 vs xG against Ironi 1.73), total ≈3.02 xG for the match. Season Over 1.5 rates are 100% for Ironi and 75% for Ashdod, and Both Teams To Score occurred in 77% and 50% of their games respectively, further reinforcing the goals signal; therefore the strongest and most reliable pick is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
In the first half a draw is the most likely outcome: Ironi Tiberias have been level at the break in 38% of their matches, while Ashdod record 58% halftime draws, so a draw after 45 minutes is a frequent scenario. The second half is more likely to be decided by the home side — in the last 5 fixtures hosts have averaged 2.4 points gained after the break compared to Ashdod’s 0.5, and Ironi’s shot-conversion rate is 13% versus the visitors’ 9%; this increases the probability that a halftime draw will turn into a home victory. Additionally, Ironi score on average 0.92 goals before the break versus 0.25 for Ashdod, and the hosts see goals at both ends in 77% of matches, which suggests offensive activity from both teams, but Ashdod’s poor form (last 5 matches: 5 defeats) reduces the visitors’ chances of holding the result. On this basis the most sensible HT/FT selection is X/1 (draw at half-time, home win at full-time), since the strongest signals are the high percentage of halftime draws and Ironi’s superiority in second halves (2.4 vs 0.5).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Ironi Tiberias | Ashdod | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Ironi Tiberias is 33% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Ironi Tiberias · 0.6 pts / game - Ashdod
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ironi Tiberias scores in 72% of games (18 of 25 meczów), while Ashdod keeps a clean sheet in 16% (4 of 25 meczów).
Ashdod scores in 72% of games (18 of 25 meczów), while Ironi Tiberias keeps a clean sheet in 20% (5 of 25 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ironi Tiberias
Over / Under - Ashdod
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Ashdod is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.8 pts / game - Ironi Tiberias · 0.96 pts / game - Ashdod
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ironi Tiberias - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 28%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Ashdod - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Ironi Tiberias
Ashdod
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Israeli Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Ironi Tiberias | Liga | Ashdod | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.36 | 3.09 | ▲ 3.28 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 52% | 59% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 52% | 58% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 25% | ▼ 16% |
| Goal before half-time | • 68% | 67% | • 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 79% | • 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Ironi Tiberias's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Ashdod. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Ironi Tiberias vs Ashdod?
The Israeli Premier League match finished Ironi Tiberias 0:0 Ashdod. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ironi Tiberias vs Ashdod?
Ironi Tiberias score 1.28 goals per game on average and Ashdod 1.28. The Israeli Premier League average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Ironi Tiberias's matches and 64% of Ashdod's.
What form are Ironi Tiberias and Ashdod in?
Over the last 5 games Ironi Tiberias have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Ashdod 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ironi Tiberias vs Ashdod?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Ironi Tiberias vs Ashdod: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


