Ittihad Tanger vs Kawkab Marrakech: match statistics
Ittihad Tanger has a clear advantage as the home side in this encounter. Although their home record is not impressive (20% wins), Kawkab Marrakech displays terrible away form with 0% wins and as many as 80% losses on the road. The visitors fail to score in 60% of their away matches, which, with an average of 0.4 goals per game, makes their offense very weak. Ittihad Tanger overall shows improvement in their last five matches with two wins and points per game at 1.6, while Kawkab has only 1.4 PPG. A key factor is also the visitors' away form (lldll), which suggests difficulties in picking up points away from home. Considering all statistics, the hosts deserve the advantage, although their home instability (60% draws) makes a points share a realistic scenario as well.
Ittihad Tanger vs Kawkab Marrakech: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Ittihad Tanger played against Kawkab Marrakech in Botola Pro (Morocco). The game was played on February 1, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Ittihad Tanger has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Kawkab Marrakech has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Ittihad Tanger scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.33. Kawkab Marrakech scores 1.00 and allows 1.13. Games in this league average 2.17 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Ittihad Tanger's games and 50% of Kawkab Marrakech's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 50%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 37% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kawkab Marrakech has the higher season xG average, 1.41 to 1.22 per game. Ittihad Tanger takes 10.0 shots per game, while Kawkab Marrakech takes 12.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Ittihad Tanger leads at halftime in 22% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Kawkab Marrakech leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.25 after halftime.
When the teams score
Ittihad Tanger's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For Kawkab Marrakech, it is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Botola Pro games average 2.17 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 37% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Ittihad Tanger has a clear advantage as the home side in this encounter. Although their home record is not impressive (20% wins), Kawkab Marrakech displays terrible away form with 0% wins and as many as 80% losses on the road. The visitors fail to score in 60% of their away matches, which, with an average of 0.4 goals per game, makes their offense very weak. Ittihad Tanger overall shows improvement in their last five matches with two wins and points per game at 1.6, while Kawkab has only 1.4 PPG. A key factor is also the visitors' away form (lldll), which suggests difficulties in picking up points away from home. Considering all statistics, the hosts deserve the advantage, although their home instability (60% draws) makes a points share a realistic scenario as well.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Ittihad Tanger | Kawkab Marrakech | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 25% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Ittihad Tanger is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Ittihad Tanger · 1.4 pts / game - Kawkab Marrakech
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kawkab Marrakech is 18% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.33 goals / game - Ittihad Tanger · 1.13 goals / game - Kawkab Marrakech
Ittihad Tanger scores in 78% of games (7 of 9 meczów), while Kawkab Marrakech keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 meczów).
Kawkab Marrakech scores in 63% of games (5 of 8 meczów), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ittihad Tanger
Over / Under - Kawkab Marrakech
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kawkab Marrakech is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.11 pts / game - Ittihad Tanger · 1.63 pts / game - Kawkab Marrakech
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ittihad Tanger - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 22% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Kawkab Marrakech - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Ittihad Tanger
Kawkab Marrakech
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| Ittihad Tanger | Liga | Kawkab Marrakech | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.33 | 2.17 | • 2.13 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 46% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 37% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 32% | ▼ 13% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 64% | ▲ 88% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 78% | 73% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Ittihad Tanger vs Kawkab Marrakech?
The Botola Pro match finished Ittihad Tanger 0:0 Kawkab Marrakech. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Ittihad Tanger vs Kawkab Marrakech?
Ittihad Tanger score 1.00 goals per game on average and Kawkab Marrakech 1.00. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Ittihad Tanger's matches and 50% of Kawkab Marrakech's.
What form are Ittihad Tanger and Kawkab Marrakech in?
Over the last 5 games Ittihad Tanger have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Kawkab Marrakech 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ittihad Tanger vs Kawkab Marrakech?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.