Morocco - Botola ProData current as of September 06, 2026

Ittihad Tanger vs UTS Rabat: match statistics

Ittihad Tanger crest
Ittihad Tanger
1 : 1half-time 1:0
UTS Rabat crest
UTS Rabat
135%(0.00)
X40%(0.00)
225%(0.00)

Statistical analysis points to a balanced competition with a prevalence of the draw scenario. Ittihad Tanger presents weak form at their own stadium with barely 14% home wins and a high percentage of draws (57%). UTS Rabat has not won any away match this season, but as many as 50% of meetings ended in a split of points. Both teams have effectiveness problems – the hosts score an average of only 0.71 goals per home match, and the visitors 0.5 away. The form of both teams in the last five matches is poor (Ittihad 0.8 PPG, UTS 0.6 PPG), which further speaks for a draw. Considering the close xG values and the tendency of both teams to draw, the most probable result is a split of points.

Ittihad Tanger vs UTS Rabat: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Ittihad Tanger played against UTS Rabat in Botola Pro (Morocco). The game was played on February 28, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Ittihad Tanger has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. UTS Rabat has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Ittihad Tanger scores 0.77 goals per game and allows 1.31. UTS Rabat scores 0.77 and allows 1.38. Games in this league average 2.05 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 54% of Ittihad Tanger's games and 69% of UTS Rabat's. The Over 2.5 rates are 31% and 23%, compared with league averages of 43% for BTTS and 34% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Ittihad Tanger has the higher season xG average, 1.21 to 1.09 per game. Ittihad Tanger takes 9.5 shots per game, while UTS Rabat takes 7.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Ittihad Tanger leads at halftime in 15% of its games and scores 0.54 goals per game after halftime. UTS Rabat leads at halftime in 8% and scores 0.46 after halftime.

When the teams score

Ittihad Tanger's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). For UTS Rabat, it is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Botola Pro games average 2.05 goals. Both teams score in 43% of games, and 34% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis points to a balanced competition with a prevalence of the draw scenario. Ittihad Tanger presents weak form at their own stadium with barely 14% home wins and a high percentage of draws (57%). UTS Rabat has not won any away match this season, but as many as 50% of meetings ended in a split of points. Both teams have effectiveness problems – the hosts score an average of only 0.71 goals per home match, and the visitors 0.5 away. The form of both teams in the last five matches is poor (Ittihad 0.8 PPG, UTS 0.6 PPG), which further speaks for a draw. Considering the close xG values and the tendency of both teams to draw, the most probable result is a split of points.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

47Possession (%)53
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
14Shots12
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
3Shots on target5
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
1.58xG1.59
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
2Corners2
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
67Dangerous attacks66
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
13Fouls14
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
3Cards4
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0.77Goals scored / game0.77
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
1.31Goals allowed / game1.38
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
52%Average possession45%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
2.54Shots on target / game2.85
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.46Shots per game7.62
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
2.54Shots on target2.85
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
8.1%Shot conversion10.1%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
52%Possession45%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
1.21xG for1.09
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
1.49xG against1.48
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

Shooting quality

Ittihad Tanger: BalancedUTS Rabat: Balanced
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
Accuracy (shots on target)27%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Ittihad Tanger is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Ittihad Tanger · 0.6 pts / game - UTS Rabat

Ittihad Tanger
WDLLL
Season result split
15% W46% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-6-5
0.92 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-4-2
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LDWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
UTS Rabat
DDLLD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W62% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-8-5
0.62 pts / game · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-3
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ittihad Tanger is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.31 goals / game - Ittihad Tanger · 1.38 goals / game - UTS Rabat

Ittihad Tanger scoring profile: very strong

Ittihad Tanger scores in 62% of games (8 of 13 meczów), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 13 meczów).

UTS Rabat scoring profile: very strong

UTS Rabat scores in 69% of games (9 of 13 meczów), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 meczów).

10Goals scored (season)10
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
17Goals conceded (season)18
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
2.08Average goals per game2.15
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
3Goals scored (last 5)3
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

How often they score at least...

62%1 goal69%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
15%2 goals8%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0%3 goals0%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0%4 goals0%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal100%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
38%2 goals31%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
8%3 goals8%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0%4 goals0%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

43%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time23%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
8%Scored in both halves8%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS15%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
40%BTTS - last 560%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time54%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
15%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

2nd half

69%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
46%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
15%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ittihad Tanger is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.92 pts / game - Ittihad Tanger · 0.85 pts / game - UTS Rabat

Ittihad Tanger - half-time state
15% leading46% draw38% trailing
UTS Rabat - half-time state
8% leading62% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.92Points per game (1st half)0.85
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0.23Goals scored (1st half)0.31
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0.54Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0.77Average goals (1st half)0.92
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
54%Clean sheet before half-time54%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
77%No goal before half-time69%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)0.92
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0.54Goals scored (2nd half)0.46
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
0.77Goals conceded (2nd half)0.77
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
1.31Average goals (2nd half)1.23
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
38%Clean sheet after half-time31%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat
54%No goal after half-time54%
Ittihad TangerUTS Rabat

Ittihad Tanger - second-half results

15% W54% R31% P
12
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.92
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 15%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

UTS Rabat - second-half results

15% W46% R38% P
11
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.85
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at halftime in 8% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Ittihad Tanger - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.60
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game0.61.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
UTS Rabat - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.60
Goals scored / game0.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.01.2
Average goals per game0.01.8
1 goal0%100%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Ittihad Tanger
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
5
31-45
2
4
46-60
2
3
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

UTS Rabat
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
6
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
4
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.12
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Ittihad Tanger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
135%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

UTS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
127%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

Ittihad TangerLigaUTS Rabat
Average goals per game 2.082.05 2.15
Both teams scored 54%43% 69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 31%34% 23%
Clean sheets 15%35% 0%
Goal before half-time 62%57% 54%
Goal after half-time 69%72% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.05
Average goals per game
43%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.09
Home goals / game
0.97
Away goals / game
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defensive advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ittihad TangerGoalJawad GhabraAssist: Abdel Hamid Maâli
  2. UTS RabatYellow cardWalid Rhailouf
  3. Ittihad TangerYellow cardAbdel Hamid Maâli
  4. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Yassine ZraaOff: Abdelhay El Forsy
  5. UTS RabatYellow cardFouad Zahouani
  6. UTS RabatGoalYacine BammouAssist: Youness Dahmani
  7. Ittihad TangerSubstitutionOn: Haitam El BahjaOff: Loay El Moussaoui
  8. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Nacer MoustaghfirOff: Yacine Bammou
  9. Ittihad TangerSubstitutionOn: Hamza El MoudeneOff: Faouzi Abd El Mouttalib
  10. Ittihad TangerYellow cardHamza El Moudene
  11. UTS RabatSubstitutionOn: Souhail ZamratOff: Mohamed Fouzair
  12. Ittihad TangerYellow cardMohamed Saoud
  13. UTS RabatYellow cardMehdi Assahabi
  14. UTS RabatYellow cardMohammed Amine Essahel

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Amine MaataouiMatches officiated: 8
5.25Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 238%Home wins25%Draws38%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Ittihad Tanger vs UTS Rabat?

The Botola Pro match finished Ittihad Tanger 1:1 UTS Rabat. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ittihad Tanger vs UTS Rabat?

Ittihad Tanger score 0.77 goals per game on average and UTS Rabat 0.77. The Botola Pro average is 2.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Ittihad Tanger's matches and 69% of UTS Rabat's.

What form are Ittihad Tanger and UTS Rabat in?

Over the last 5 games Ittihad Tanger have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and UTS Rabat 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ittihad Tanger vs UTS Rabat?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.