Morocco - Botola ProGrand Stade de TangerData current as of 17 July 2026

Ittihad Tanger vs Wydad Casablanca: match statistics

Ittihad Tanger vs Wydad Casablanca: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Ittihad Tanger play Wydad Casablanca in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match date is 3 June 2026 at 20:00. Venue: Grand Stade de Tanger. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Ittihad Tanger: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Wydad Casablanca: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Ittihad Tanger scores 0.90 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. Wydad Casablanca scores 1.30 and concedes 1.10. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Ittihad Tanger 53%, Wydad Casablanca 50%. Over 2.5: Ittihad Tanger 27%, Wydad Casablanca 47%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

Wydad Casablanca has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.30. Ittihad Tanger: 10.4 shots per match, Wydad Casablanca: 11.0.

Match halves

Ittihad Tanger: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.57. Wydad Casablanca: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

Ittihad Tanger: 76-90+ (9 goals). Wydad Casablanca: 31-45+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Wydad Casablanca is the favorite due to a clear attacking edge: the visitors average 1.64 goals away with an average xG of 1.35, while Ittihad Tanger at home scores only 0.70 goals with xG 1.28. Wydad averages 4.27 shots on target per match and has a conversion rate around 16%, versus the hosts’ 2.7 SoT and 6% conversion, indicating greater efficiency in chance conversion. Additionally, Wydad has a 55% away win rate and a +8 away goal difference, whereas Ittihad win only 10% of home matches and have a -3 home goal difference; the visitors concede 0.91 goals on average away, the hosts 1.0. However, note that Ittihad record as many as 70% draws at home and in their last 5 league matches have a 2 wins and 3 draws record with an average of 1.8 points per match, so a draw is a realistic outcome. Considering Wydad’s higher effectiveness (1.64 vs 0.70) and superior away record, I forecast an away win, with a significant probability of a draw.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
11Shots17
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
4Shots on target5
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
1.37xG1.79
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
2Corners6
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
54Dangerous attacks51
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
10Fouls13
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
3Cards2
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
0.9Goals scored / match1.3
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
1.03Goals conceded / match1.1
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
49%Average possession52%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
3.27Shots on target / match4.57
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.4Shots per match10.97
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
3.27Shots on target4.57
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
8.7%Shot conversion11.9%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
49%Possession52%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
1.3xG for1.4
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
1.48xG against1.34
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca

Shooting quality

Ittihad Tanger: BalancedWydad Casablanca: Balanced
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
Accuracy (shots on target)31%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ittihad Tanger
WLDLW
Season result split
30% W40% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-12-9
1.30 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-8-2
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Wydad Casablanca
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
43% W13% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-4-13
1.43 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-2-7
Last 5 away
1-0-4
WLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Wydad Casablanca is 44% better for: goals scored per match.

0.9 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger · 1.3 goals / match - Wydad Casablanca

Ittihad Tanger is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.03 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger · 1.1 goals / match - Wydad Casablanca

Ittihad Tanger scoring profile: strong

Ittihad Tanger scores in 67% of matches (20 of 30 matches), while Wydad Casablanca keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 matches).

Wydad Casablanca scoring profile: very strong

Wydad Casablanca scores in 73% of matches (22 of 30 matches), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).

27Goals scored (season)39
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
31Goals conceded (season)33
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
1.93Average goals in match2.4
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
4Goals scored (last 5)2
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
5Goals conceded (last 5)9
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal73%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
23%2 goals30%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
0%3 goals17%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
0%4 goals7%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal70%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
20%2 goals33%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
3%3 goals7%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
0%4 goals0%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Wydad Casablanca - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.15 of 30 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time20%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
0%BTTS in both halves7%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
10%Scored in both halves17%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca

BTTS and goal count

23%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
40%BTTS - last 540%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Wydad Casablanca is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.07 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger · 1.47 pts / match - Wydad Casablanca

Ittihad Tanger - half-time state
20% leading47% draw33% trailing
Wydad Casablanca - half-time state
37% leading37% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.07Points per match (1st half)1.47
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.73
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
0.83Average goals (1st half)1.2
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
57%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
70%No goal before half-time50%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca

After half-time (2nd half)

1.37Points per match (2nd half)1.2
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
1.1Average goals (2nd half)1.2
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
53%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca
53%No goal after half-time60%
Ittihad TangerWydad Casablanca

Ittihad Tanger - second-half results

33% W37% R30% P
32
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Wydad Casablanca - second-half results

27% W40% R33% P
44
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ittihad Tanger - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Wydad Casablanca - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.200.60
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-4-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Ittihad Tanger
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
11
31-45
3
6
46-60
5
5
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Wydad Casablanca
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
4
4
16-30
12
6
31-45
4
4
46-60
6
8
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Ittihad Tanger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Wydad Casablanca

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

Ittihad TangerLigaWydad Casablanca
Average goals in match 1.932.17 2.40
Both teams scored 53%52% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%38% 47%
Clean sheets 20%30% 30%
Goal before half-time 63%63% 70%
Goal after half-time 73%73% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Ittihad Tanger 0 - 0 - 1 Wydad Casablanca. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Wydad Athletic Club
2 : 0
Ittihad Riadhi de Tanger

FAQ

What was the result of Ittihad Tanger vs Wydad Casablanca?

The Botola Pro match finished Ittihad Tanger 2:1 Wydad Casablanca. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Ittihad Tanger vs Wydad Casablanca?

Ittihad Tanger score 0.90 goals per game on average and Wydad Casablanca 1.30. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Ittihad Tanger's matches and 50% of Wydad Casablanca's.

What form are Ittihad Tanger and Wydad Casablanca in?

Over the last 5 games Ittihad Tanger have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Wydad Casablanca 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ittihad Tanger vs Wydad Casablanca?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.