Jagiellonia II vs Swit: match statistics
Jagiellonia II vs Swit: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Jagiellonia II played against Swit in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The game was played on April 11, 2026. Final score: 5:1.
Recent form
Jagiellonia II has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Swit has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Jagiellonia II scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 1.29. Swit scores 1.40 and allows 1.76. Games in this league average 3.40 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Jagiellonia II's games and 56% of Swit's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 64%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 68% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Jagiellonia II has the higher season xG average, 1.45 to 1.24 per game. Jagiellonia II takes 8.9 shots per game, while Swit takes 6.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Jagiellonia II leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Swit leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.76 after halftime.
When the teams score
Jagiellonia II's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Swit, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
3 Liga Group 1 games average 3.40 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 68% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Jagiellonia II are the favorites for this match: in the last 5 games they scored 10 goals and recorded 4 wins (form: wwwlw, 2.4 points per game), while Świt scored 4 goals and won only 1 match in the same period (0.8 points per game). The hosts create significantly more chances – on average 16 shots and 7 on target at home versus 9 shots and 3.38 on target in Świt’s away matches, and xG is 1.59 versus 1.16, indicating both higher quality and quantity of opportunities for Jagiellonia II. Defensively the gap is clear: Świt concedes on average 2.5 goals away, while the hosts concede 1.5 at home; in the last 5 matches Świt conceded 7 goals and Jagiellonia II only 2. Although Świt have a higher shot conversion rate (13% versus 9%), their lower shot volume and high away defeat rate (58% losses) limit realistic chances of winning. Based on this I predict a home victory; I assess the probability at approximately 65% for Jagiellonia II, 20% for a draw and 15% for Świt.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators point to a moderate BTTS tendency: Jagiellonia II has BTTS at 54% and Swit 58%, while the league BTTS occurs in 64% of matches. However, recent form is divergent — in the last 5 matches Jagiellonia II recorded BTTS in only 20% of games, conceded on average 0.4 goals (2 goals in 5 matches) and scored on average 2.0 goals, whereas Swit has 60% BTTS in its last 5 and scores on average 0.8 goals (4 goals in 5 matches). Seasonal goal averages show a home advantage: Jagiellonia II scores 1.62 goals with xG_for 1.29 and concedes 1.08, while Swit has 1.17 goals with xG_for 1.16 but concedes as many as 2.5 goals this season. Considering the strong defensive trend from the home side in the last 5 matches (0.4 goals conceded) and Swit’s poor recent scoring efficiency (0.8 goals per game), the "No" (no BTTS) scenario appears more likely, hence an estimated 60% against 40% for "Yes".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
A model combining xG and seasonal averages yields 1.53 expected goals for Jagiellonia II (xG_for_home 1.29 vs xG_against_away 1.76) and 1.31 for Swit (xG_for_away 1.16 vs xG_against_home 1.46), totaling 2.84 goals, which aligns with the seasonal sum 1.62+1.17=2.79. Both teams frequently feature matches with at least 2 goals: home side 69% over 1.5, away side 92% over 1.5, while the league averages 3.41 goals per game and 68% of matches over 2.5. Jagiellonia II is in form (last 5: 10 scored, 2 conceded, avg 2.0/0.4), whereas Swit in the last 5 has 4 scored and 7 conceded (avg 0.8/1.4) and concedes 2.5 goals per game on the season, weakening the away defense. From these inputs the probability of over 1.5 is about 77% (over 2.5 ~54%, over 3.5 ~32%), so the strongest play is an over on the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
HT/FT analysis indicates a home advantage: in the last 5 matches Jagiellonia II led at the break in 60% of games and scored an average of 1.2 goals by half-time versus 0.4 for Świt. Seasonally the home side scores 1.62 goals per game, while the visitors concede 2.5 goals per game on average, indicating Świt’s defensive issues. After the break the home team is stronger — in the last 5 second halves they have a goal balance of +4 and average 2.2 points, and seasonally second-half ppg is 1.62 for the hosts versus 1.17 for the guests, so they can close out wins. At half-time the hosts average 0.92 goals versus 0.33 for the opponents, therefore the scenario of leading at the break and winning at full-time (1/1) is the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Jagiellonia II | Swit | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.19 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.56 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Jagiellonia II is 200% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / game - Jagiellonia II · 0.8 pts / game - Swit
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Swit is 12% better for: goals scored per game.
1.25 goals / game - Jagiellonia II · 1.4 goals / game - Swit
Jagiellonia II is 36% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.29 goals / game - Jagiellonia II · 1.76 goals / game - Swit
Jagiellonia II scores in 75% of games (18 of 24 meczów), while Swit keeps a clean sheet in 20% (5 of 25 meczów).
Swit scores in 76% of games (19 of 25 meczów), while Jagiellonia II keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Jagiellonia II
Over / Under - Swit
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Jagiellonia II is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / game - Jagiellonia II · 1.12 pts / game - Swit
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Jagiellonia II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Swit - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Jagiellonia II
Swit
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).
Teams vs league
| Jagiellonia II | Liga | Swit | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.54 | 3.40 | ▼ 3.16 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 64% | ▼ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 68% | ▼ 64% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 20% | • 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 71% | 76% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 87% | • 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Jagiellonia II's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Swit. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Jagiellonia II vs Swit?
The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Jagiellonia II 5:1 Swit. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Jagiellonia II vs Swit?
Jagiellonia II score 1.25 goals per game on average and Swit 1.40. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.40 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Jagiellonia II's matches and 56% of Swit's.
What form are Jagiellonia II and Swit in?
Over the last 5 games Jagiellonia II have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Swit 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jagiellonia II vs Swit?
The statistical background for Jagiellonia II vs Swit — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


