Jagiellonia II vs Swit: match statistics
Jagiellonia II vs Swit: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Jagiellonia II play Swit in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The match date is 11 April 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 5:1.
Current form
Jagiellonia II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Swit: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Jagiellonia II scores 1.35 and concedes 1.32 goals per match. Swit scores 1.50 and concedes 1.94. League average: 3.33 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Jagiellonia II 53%, Swit 59%. Over 2.5: Jagiellonia II 41%, Swit 65%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.
xG, shots and style
Jagiellonia II has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.29. Jagiellonia II: 8.3 shots per match, Swit: 6.9.
Match halves
Jagiellonia II: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.71. Swit: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.79.
Goals by minute
Jagiellonia II: 76-90+ (11 goals). Swit: 76-90+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3 Liga Group 1: 3.33 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Jagiellonia II are the favorites for this match: in the last 5 games they scored 10 goals and recorded 4 wins (form: wwwlw, 2.4 points per game), while Świt scored 4 goals and won only 1 match in the same period (0.8 points per game). The hosts create significantly more chances – on average 16 shots and 7 on target at home versus 9 shots and 3.38 on target in Świt’s away matches, and xG is 1.59 versus 1.16, indicating both higher quality and quantity of opportunities for Jagiellonia II. Defensively the gap is clear: Świt concedes on average 2.5 goals away, while the hosts concede 1.5 at home; in the last 5 matches Świt conceded 7 goals and Jagiellonia II only 2. Although Świt have a higher shot conversion rate (13% versus 9%), their lower shot volume and high away defeat rate (58% losses) limit realistic chances of winning. Based on this I predict a home victory; I assess the probability at approximately 65% for Jagiellonia II, 20% for a draw and 15% for Świt.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Jagiellonia II | Swit | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.19 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.56 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Jagiellonia II is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Jagiellonia II · 1.2 pts / match - Swit
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Swit is 11% better for: goals scored per match.
1.35 goals / match - Jagiellonia II · 1.5 goals / match - Swit
Jagiellonia II is 47% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.32 goals / match - Jagiellonia II · 1.94 goals / match - Swit
Jagiellonia II scores in 76% of matches (26 of 34 matches), while Swit keeps a clean sheet in 21% (7 of 34 matches).
Swit scores in 79% of matches (27 of 34 matches), while Jagiellonia II keeps a clean sheet in 26% (9 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Jagiellonia II
Over / Under — Swit
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Jagiellonia II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Swit - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Jagiellonia II
Swit
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).
Teams vs league
| Jagiellonia II | Liga | Swit | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.68 | 3.33 | ▲ 3.44 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 53% | 62% | ▼ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 41% | 66% | • 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 26% | 20% | • 21% |
| Goal before half-time | • 74% | 74% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 83% | • 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Jagiellonia II 0 - 0 - 1 Swit. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Jagiellonia II vs Swit?
The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Jagiellonia II 5:1 Swit. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Jagiellonia II vs Swit?
Jagiellonia II score 1.35 goals per game on average and Swit 1.50. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Jagiellonia II's matches and 59% of Swit's.
What form are Jagiellonia II and Swit in?
Over the last 5 games Jagiellonia II have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Swit 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jagiellonia II vs Swit?
The statistical background for Jagiellonia II vs Swit — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.