Finland - YkkösliigaJärvenpään keskuskenttäData current as of October 17, 2026

JäPS vs JIPPO: match statistics

JäPS crest
JäPS
0 : 4half-time 0:2
JIPPO crest
JIPPO

JäPS vs JIPPO: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

JäPS played against JIPPO in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on October 9, 2026. Venue: Järvenpään keskuskenttä. Final score: 0:4.

Recent form

JäPS has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. JIPPO has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

JäPS scores 0.92 goals per game and allows 1.44. JIPPO scores 1.28 and allows 0.84. Games in this league average 2.57 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 28% of JäPS's games and 40% of JIPPO's. The Over 2.5 rates are 48% and 36%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

JIPPO has the higher season xG average, 1.62 to 1.26 per game. JäPS takes 10.4 shots per game, while JIPPO takes 13.2.

First-half and second-half trends

JäPS leads at halftime in 28% of its games and scores 0.52 goals per game after halftime. JIPPO leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.84 after halftime.

When the teams score

JäPS's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). For JIPPO, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Ykkösliiga games average 2.57 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 4 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

JIPPO have a slight edge thanks to their more effective attack: away from home, they average 1.58 goals from 1.41 xG, while JäPS score 0.92 goals per game at home from 1.28 xG. The visitors also average 4 shots on target per match, compared with 3.58 for the hosts, strengthening the case for their greater attacking potential. Their form over the last five matches is identical in terms of results, with both teams recording 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 defeats, but JIPPO conceded 4 goals in that period compared with 7 for JäPS. However, the hosts can point to a solid home defensive record: they concede an average of 0.83 goals and keep a clean sheet in 67% of matches, so the visitors’ edge remains slight.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

A scenario in which at least one team fails to score is more likely: both teams scored in 31% of JäPS matches and 50% of JIPPO matches. JäPS failed to score in 46% of its matches and averages 1.0 goals, while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 33% of matches and concedes an average of 1.08 goals. The visitors are more effective in attack, averaging 1.58 goals compared with the hosts’ 1.0, but JäPS concedes an average of just 0.62 goals at home and keeps a clean sheet in 46% of matches. Over their last five matches, both teams averaged 1.0 goals, while the share of matches in which both teams scored was 40% and 20%, respectively, further supporting the BTTS - No pick. This means at least one team is expected not to score; it does not necessarily imply a 0-0 draw.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is Under 3.5 goals: this line landed in 85% of JäPS’s home matches and 75% of JIPPO’s away matches. JäPS concede an average of just 0.62 goals at home, while JIPPO concede 1.08 away, limiting the chances of a very high-scoring game. However, the attacking potential is not negligible: the hosts average 1.82 xG and the visitors 1.41 xG, so the 2.5-goal line offers a less decisive edge. Over their last five matches, both teams scored an average of 1.0 goals, and only 20% of JIPPO’s matches in that period went Over 2.5 goals. The forecast of 2.35 total goals therefore points primarily to Under 3.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as JäPS were level at the break in 8 of 13 matches and averaged 0.23 goals both scored and conceded in first halves. Neither team led at the break in their last five matches, further weakening the case for an early lead. After the break, the hosts score an average of 0.77 goals, while their attack generates 1.82 xG over the full match, compared with the 1.30 xG JIPPO concede. JäPS’s stronger defensive record also supports a home win: they concede an average of 0.62 goals per match, compared with 1.08 for the visitors. JIPPO do score more goals, 1.58 to 1.00, so a draw or an away win remain realistic outcomes; however, after an even first half, I expect the hosts to turn the match in their favor.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 2
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
JäPSJIPPO
3Shots14
JäPSJIPPO
1Shots on target7
JäPSJIPPO
0.53xG1.71
JäPSJIPPO
5Corners5
JäPSJIPPO
34Dangerous attacks46
JäPSJIPPO
12Fouls10
JäPSJIPPO
1Cards1
JäPSJIPPO

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.92Goals scored / game1.28
JäPSJIPPO
1.44Goals allowed / game0.84
JäPSJIPPO
46%Average possession55%
JäPSJIPPO
3.52Shots on target / game4.88
JäPSJIPPO

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.36Shots per game13.2
JäPSJIPPO
3.52Shots on target4.88
JäPSJIPPO
8.9%Shot conversion9.7%
JäPSJIPPO
46%Possession55%
JäPSJIPPO
1.26xG for1.62
JäPSJIPPO
1.57xG against1.08
JäPSJIPPO

Shooting quality

JäPS: BalancedJIPPO: Balanced
JäPSJIPPO
Accuracy (shots on target)34%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

JäPS
DWLWL
Season result split
44% W8% D48% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-2-12
1.40 pts / game · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-1-4
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
JIPPO
WLWLD
Season result split
44% W32% D24% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-8-6
1.64 pts / game · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
6-3-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DLWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.56Opponent xG: 1.04BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JIPPO is 39% better for: goals scored per game.

0.92 goals / game - JäPS · 1.28 goals / game - JIPPO

JIPPO is 71% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.44 goals / game - JäPS · 0.84 goals / game - JIPPO

JäPS scoring profile: mixed

JäPS scores in 64% of games (16 of 25 games), while JIPPO keeps a clean sheet in 40% (10 of 25 games).

JIPPO scoring profile: mixed

JIPPO scores in 64% of games (16 of 25 games), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 44% (11 of 25 games).

23Goals scored (season)32
JäPSJIPPO
36Goals conceded (season)21
JäPSJIPPO
2.36Average goals per game2.12
JäPSJIPPO
5Goals scored (last 5)5
JäPSJIPPO
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
JäPSJIPPO

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal64%
JäPSJIPPO
20%2 goals40%
JäPSJIPPO
8%3 goals24%
JäPSJIPPO
0%4 goals0%
JäPSJIPPO

How often they concede at least...

56%1 goal60%
JäPSJIPPO
44%2 goals16%
JäPSJIPPO
24%3 goals8%
JäPSJIPPO
12%4 goals0%
JäPSJIPPO

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time4%
JäPSJIPPO
0%BTTS in both halves4%
JäPSJIPPO
8%Scored in both halves8%
JäPSJIPPO

BTTS and goal count

28%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
JäPSJIPPO
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
JäPSJIPPO
40%BTTS - last 520%
JäPSJIPPO

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
JäPSJIPPO
16%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
JäPSJIPPO
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
JäPSJIPPO

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time64%
JäPSJIPPO
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
JäPSJIPPO
16%Min. 3 goals after half-time16%
JäPSJIPPO

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

JäPS - half-time state
28% leading40% draw32% trailing
JIPPO - half-time state
24% leading48% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per game (1st half)1.2
JäPSJIPPO
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.44
JäPSJIPPO
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
JäPSJIPPO
0.84Average goals (1st half)0.88
JäPSJIPPO
60%Clean sheet before half-time68%
JäPSJIPPO
68%No goal before half-time72%
JäPSJIPPO

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per game (2nd half)1.52
JäPSJIPPO
0.52Goals scored (2nd half)0.84
JäPSJIPPO
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
JäPSJIPPO
1.52Average goals (2nd half)1.24
JäPSJIPPO
48%Clean sheet after half-time64%
JäPSJIPPO
60%No goal after half-time56%
JäPSJIPPO

JäPS - second-half results

28% W36% D36% L
31
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-12
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding157%

Leads at halftime in 28% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

JIPPO - second-half results

36% W44% D20% L
30
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding183%

Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

JäPS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.401.60
Goals scored / game0.01.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game0.61.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
JIPPO - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.401.60
Goals scored / game0.01.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.2
Average goals per game0.61.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-3+4
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

JäPS
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
5
6
46-60
4
8
61-75
4
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

JIPPO
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
2
4
16-30
5
4
31-45
6
1
46-60
3
5
61-75
12
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.24
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.9 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-38%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
13%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

JäPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+13.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

JIPPO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.10
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

JäPSLigaJIPPO
Average goals per game▼ 2.362.57▼ 2.12
Both teams scored▼ 28%46%▼ 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 48%46%▼ 36%
Clean sheets▲ 44%31%▲ 40%
Goal before half-time▼ 64%66%▼ 56%
Goal after half-time▲ 76%74%▼ 64%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per game
46%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / game
1.24
Away goals / game
+7%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defensive advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JäPSGoalJesse Nikki
  2. JäPSYellow cardHerkko Kuosa
  3. JäPSSubstitutionOn: Impton SöderlundOff: Herkko Kuosa
  4. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Olavi KeturiOff: Eeli Kinnunen
  5. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Lassi ForssOff: Eemeli Honkola
  6. JIPPOSubstitutionOn: Jyri KiuruOff: Nuutti Tykkyläinen
  7. JäPSSubstitutionOn: Aleksi SainioOff: Jermu Virtanen
  8. JäPSSubstitutionOn: Gabriel TaskosOff: Riku Selander
  9. JäPSSubstitutionOn: Jyry AaltoOff: Henrik Ölander
  10. JIPPOYellow cardVictor de Paula

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from JäPS's perspective: 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss against JIPPO. Games average 1.40 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.

JIPPO
1 : 0
JäPS
JIPPO
0 : 0
JäPS
Järvenpään Palloseura
1 : 1
JIPPO Joensuu
JIPPO Joensuu
1 : 1
Järvenpään Palloseura
Järvenpään Palloseura
1 : 1
JIPPO Joensuu

FAQ

What was the result of JäPS vs JIPPO?

The Ykkösliiga match finished JäPS 0:4 JIPPO. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between JäPS and JIPPO?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches JäPS won 0, JIPPO won 1 and 4 ended level. These games averaged 1.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before JäPS vs JIPPO?

JäPS score 0.92 goals per game on average and JIPPO 1.28. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 28% of JäPS's matches and 40% of JIPPO's.

What form are JäPS and JIPPO in?

Over the last 5 games JäPS have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and JIPPO 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JäPS vs JIPPO?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for JäPS vs JIPPO: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.