JäPS vs PK-35: match statistics
JäPS vs PK-35: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
JäPS played against PK-35 in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on May 2, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
JäPS has 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.75 points per game. PK-35 has 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 1.75 points per game.
Scoring records
JäPS scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.25. PK-35 scores 1.25 and allows 0.75. Games in this league average 2.05 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 0% of JäPS's games and 25% of PK-35's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 25%, compared with league averages of 32% for BTTS and 42% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
PK-35 has the higher season xG average, 1.42 to 1.05 per game. JäPS takes 7.8 shots per game, while PK-35 takes 11.5.
First-half and second-half trends
JäPS leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.25 goals per game after halftime. PK-35 leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
JäPS's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For PK-35, it is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.05 goals. Both teams score in 32% of games, and 42% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1) because JäPS has a perfect home record: 100% wins and 100% clean sheets, averaging 2.0 goals scored and 0.0 conceded per home match. JäPS is in strong form — 15 goals in the last 5 matches and 4 wins in those five fixtures (form 'wwlww'), yielding 2.4 points per game over that period. PK-35 generates more chances: on the road they average 21 shots and 7 on target with 48% possession, and their away xG is 2.39 versus JäPS’s 1.34 home xG. However, the visitors have a low conversion rate of 5% in away matches versus 19% for the hosts, meaning they score far fewer goals from a higher volume of chances. Considering JäPS’s flawless home statistics, superior recent form (4/5 wins) and significantly higher finishing efficiency, I assign JäPS a 55% probability, draw 20% and PK-35 win 25%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal against BTTS is that PK-35 have a 100% clean sheets rate and 0% BTTS as visitors this season, while JäPS at home record BTTS in only 33% of matches, clearly favoring the 'No' scenario. Additionally, the league is characterized by a low BTTS rate (32%) and a very high clean sheets share (84%), which strengthens the 'No' option. Offensive data partly contradicts this — PK-35 generate 2.39 xG, 21.0 shots and 7.0 shots on target per game, but with a low conversion of 5%, while JäPS at home have only 1.09 xG and 3.67 shots on target, so the visitors create more chances but do not always convert them. In the last 5 matches both teams have scored more goals (JäPS 3.0 on average and 15 goals in 5 matches, PK-35 2.8 on average and 14 goals), however PK-35 conceded only 0.6 goals per game (3 conceded) versus JäPS 1.2 (6 conceded), which further argues for the visitors' defensive solidity. Overall, given PK-35's 100% clean sheets and 0% BTTS away and the league's 32% BTTS and 84% clean sheets, I assess BTTS probability at 30% versus 70% no goal from one side, and therefore recommend 'No' (No Goal).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model projects 0.84 expected goals for JäPS and 2.00 for PK-35, totaling 2.84 goals. PK-35 averages 2.39 xG and 21 shots (7 on target) per match, while JäPS records 1.09 xG and 8.33 shots (3.67 on target); JäPS’s defense concedes 1.61 xG per game, giving the visitors a clear creative advantage. In their last 5 matches JäPS scored 15 goals (3.0 per game) and conceded 6 (1.2), while PK-35 scored 14 goals (2.8 per game) and conceded 3 (0.6), confirming both teams’ offensive form. Considering the combined 2.84 expected goals and PK-35’s superiority in xG and shots, I estimate the probability of Over 1.5 at about 88%, Over 2.5 at about 66%, and Over 3.5 at about 36%. The best line to play is Over 2.5 (side: Over), since the projected 2.84 goals and PK-35’s dominance in chance creation provide the strongest signal at this line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
PK-35 holds a clear advantage in the data: away xG_for_avg of 2.39 versus JäPS’s 1.09, with an average of 21.0 shots and 7.0 on target compared to the hosts’ 8.33 shots and 3.67 on target. The visitors have led at the break in 100% of their matches and have not conceded this season (seasonConcededAVG_away 0.0, seasonCSPercentage_away 100.0), which strongly supports PK-35 leading at Half-Time. JäPS has a higher finishing efficiency (16.0% versus PK-35’s 5.0%) and averages 1.33 goals per match, but with far fewer attempts this does not offset the visitors’ dominance in xG and shot volume. Additionally, PK-35 averages 3.0 points per match versus the hosts’ 1.33, so the most likely scenario is the visitors leading at the break and winning after 90 minutes (2/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| JäPS | PK-35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 52% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PK-35 is 25% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - JäPS · 1.25 goals / game - PK-35
PK-35 is 67% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.25 goals / game - JäPS · 0.75 goals / game - PK-35
JäPS scores in 50% of games (2 of 4 meczów), while PK-35 keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 meczów).
PK-35 scores in 50% of games (2 of 4 meczów), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 75% (3 of 4 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - JäPS
Over / Under - PK-35
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
PK-35 is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.75 pts / game - JäPS · 2 pts / game - PK-35
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JäPS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
PK-35 - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.75 | 1.25 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 75% |
| No goal | 50% | 75% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.25 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 0.5 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 25% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 75% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
JäPS
PK-35
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| JäPS | Liga | PK-35 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.25 | 2.05 | • 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 32% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 42% | ▼ 25% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 75% | 42% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 63% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 58% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from JäPS's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses against PK-35. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of JäPS vs PK-35?
The Ykkösliiga match finished JäPS 1:0 PK-35. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between JäPS and PK-35?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches JäPS won 0, PK-35 won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before JäPS vs PK-35?
JäPS score 1.00 goals per game on average and PK-35 1.25. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 0% of JäPS's matches and 25% of PK-35's.
What form are JäPS and PK-35 in?
Over the last 5 games JäPS have a 2-1-1 record (1.75 points per game) and PK-35 2-1-1 (1.75 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JäPS vs PK-35?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for JäPS vs PK-35: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.