Jaro vs KuPS: match statistics
Jaro vs KuPS: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Jaro play KuPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match date is 18 April 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Jaro: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. KuPS: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Jaro scores 0.94 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. KuPS scores 1.81 and concedes 0.94. League average: 2.67 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Jaro 50%, KuPS 63%. Over 2.5: Jaro 56%, KuPS 44%. League level: BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.
xG, shots and style
KuPS has higher xG: 1.88 vs 1.42. Jaro: 11.7 shots per match, KuPS: 16.1.
Match halves
Jaro: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.25. KuPS: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.81.
Goals by minute
Jaro: 16-30 (4 goals). KuPS: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Veikkausliiga: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 51%, Over 2.5 47%.
Head-to-head
3 H2H matches: 0-0-3. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 33%.
Match description
KuPS is the favourite: they sit 2nd in the table while Jaro are 9th. KuPS have 100% away wins this season versus 0% home wins for Jaro. Away, KuPS average 3 goals per match, 12 shots with 7 on target and a 25% conversion rate, whereas Jaro at home average 10 shots with 3 on target but 0 goals on average and fail to score in 100% of their home matches. Jaro record 60% possession and a home xG of 1.29 against xG conceded 0.77, which shows they create chances (1.29 xG, 10 shots) but are extremely inefficient; KuPS away have xG for 1.53 and xG against 1.74. In the last 5 matches KuPS have conceded 11 goals and Jaro 5, indicating defensive issues for both teams, but KuPS’s superior efficiency (25% conversion and no matches without a goal) gives them a real edge. Therefore, considering shot metrics, conversion and league positions, I predict an away win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Jaro | KuPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
KuPS is 160% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Jaro · 2.6 pts / match - KuPS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
KuPS is 93% better for: goals scored per match.
0.94 goals / match - Jaro · 1.81 goals / match - KuPS
KuPS is 113% better for: goals conceded per match.
2 goals / match - Jaro · 0.94 goals / match - KuPS
Jaro scores in 56% of matches (9 of 16 matches), while KuPS keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 matches).
KuPS scores in 88% of matches (14 of 16 matches), while Jaro keeps a clean sheet in 19% (3 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Jaro
Over / Under — KuPS
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KuPS is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / match - Jaro · 1.81 pts / match - KuPS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Jaro - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
KuPS - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Jaro
KuPS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).
Teams vs league
| Jaro | Liga | KuPS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.94 | 2.67 | • 2.75 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 51% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 47% | ▼ 44% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 28% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 75% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 78% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Jaro 0 - 0 - 3 KuPS. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Jaro vs KuPS?
The Veikkausliiga match finished Jaro 1:1 KuPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Jaro and KuPS?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Jaro won 0, KuPS won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Jaro vs KuPS?
Jaro score 0.94 goals per game on average and KuPS 1.81. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Jaro's matches and 63% of KuPS's.
What form are Jaro and KuPS in?
Over the last 5 games Jaro have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and KuPS 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jaro vs KuPS?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.