Jaro vs Mariehamn: match statistics
Jaro vs Mariehamn: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Jaro played against Mariehamn in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The game was played on May 23, 2026. Venue: Jakobstads Centralplan. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
Jaro has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.40 points per game. Mariehamn has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Jaro scores 0.50 goals per game and allows 1.88. Mariehamn scores 0.71 and allows 1.43. Games in this league average 2.38 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Jaro's games and 57% of Mariehamn's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 29%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 40% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Jaro has the higher season xG average, 1.34 to 0.78 per game. Jaro takes 10.8 shots per game, while Mariehamn takes 5.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Jaro leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.13 goals per game after halftime. Mariehamn leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.29 after halftime.
When the teams score
Jaro's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For Mariehamn, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Veikkausliiga games average 2.38 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 40% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a draw (X). Jaro averages 1.00 goal per home match with an average xG of 1.28, registering 9 shots and 3.67 on target per game at home, whereas Mariehamn away averages only 0.33 goals, xG 0.52, 3 shots and 1 on-target shot per match — a clear home advantage in chance creation. At the same time, Jaro have conceded 17 goals in their last 5 matches and average only 0.2 points per game over that period, while Mariehamn have scored 7 and conceded 4 in their last 5 and average 1.6 points per game, indicating better form for the visitors. Season-long stats also show Jaro are yet to win at home (0% wins, 67% draws), and Mariehamn have no away wins and failed to score in 67% of away matches (FTS 67%), which increases the likelihood of a shared point. Considering Jaro’s superiority in creating chances (xG 1.28 vs 0.52) but their serious defensive issues in the last 5 matches, I rate a draw as the most likely outcome (home 38%, draw 42%, away 20%).
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season and last-5 stats point to a BTTS scenario: Jaro has 75% of matches with BTTS this season, Mariehamn 33%, while in the last 5 matches these figures are 40% and 60% respectively. In the last 5 games Jaro concedes an average of 3.4 goals (17 conceded) and has conceded 15 goals in the season, whereas Mariehamn scored 7 goals in the last 5 (1.4 per match) and 5 in the season, indicating the visitors are in better scoring form. This is supported by xG: season xG for Jaro is 0.98 versus 0.52 for Mariehamn, and xG against are 2.13 and 2.18, meaning both teams give opponents many chances. Jaro averages 7.75 shots and 3.25 on target per game versus Mariehamn’s 3.0 shots and 1.0 on target, and with a league average goals of 2.35 and both teams having 0% clean sheets, this is a strong signal for BTTS. Therefore I assess the probability of Both Teams To Score (BTTS - Yes) at 70% versus 30% for No Goal, making "yes" the preferred pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I recommend Over 1.5: 75% of Jaro’s matches and 67% of Mariehamn’s matches have finished over 1.5 goals, and the combined expected score from seasonal averages is 2.13 goals (1.34 for Jaro vs 0.79 for Mariehamn). Jaro scores on average 1.00 goal with xG 0.98, Mariehamn scores 0.33 with xG 0.52; both teams concurrently concede higher numbers (Jaro 1.25 goals conceded seasonally, Mariehamn 1.67). In the last 5 matches Jaro conceded 17 goals (3.4 per game) and had 80% of games over 2.5 goals, while Mariehamn scored 7 goals in their last 5 (1.4 per game), which increases the likelihood of additional strikes. Overall, considering the seasonal 75%/67% over1.5 rates, the expected 2.13 goals and Jaro’s weaker defense in recent form, the strongest and safest pick is the over at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X) — I assess its probability at 40%. The home side draws at the break in 50% of matches and have as many as 75% of their season’s matches finishing as draws, with an average first-half goals of 0.75 for the hosts versus 0.0 for the visitors, indicating a low scoring environment and frequent point splits. xG shows a slight advantage for the home team, 0.98 versus 0.52, but both teams concede high xG against (2.13 and 2.18) and exhibit moderate finishing efficiency with 3.25 versus 1.0 shots on target, which favors draws over decisive results. The last 5 matches confirm pressure on the hosts (dllll — 1 draw, 4 losses) and better form for the visitors (wldwd — 2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss), therefore an alternative scenario is a draw at half-time and an away win (X/2, 18%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Jaro | Mariehamn | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.13 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Mariehamn is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / game - Jaro · 0.6 pts / game - Mariehamn
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mariehamn is 42% better for: goals scored per game.
0.5 goals / game - Jaro · 0.71 goals / game - Mariehamn
Mariehamn is 31% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.88 goals / game - Jaro · 1.43 goals / game - Mariehamn
Jaro scores in 38% of games (3 of 8 meczów), while Mariehamn keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 7 meczów).
Mariehamn scores in 57% of games (4 of 7 meczów), while Jaro keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Jaro
Over / Under - Mariehamn
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Jaro is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Jaro · 0.86 pts / game - Mariehamn
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Jaro - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Mariehamn - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Jaro
Mariehamn
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).
Teams vs league
| Jaro | Liga | Mariehamn | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.38 | 2.38 | ▼ 2.14 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 52% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 38% | 40% | ▼ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 27% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 88% | 79% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 63% | 73% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Jaro's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss against Mariehamn. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Jaro vs Mariehamn?
The Veikkausliiga match finished Jaro 3:0 Mariehamn. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Jaro and Mariehamn?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Jaro won 1, Mariehamn won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Jaro vs Mariehamn?
Jaro score 0.50 goals per game on average and Mariehamn 0.71. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.38 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Jaro's matches and 57% of Mariehamn's.
What form are Jaro and Mariehamn in?
Over the last 5 games Jaro have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Mariehamn 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Jaro vs Mariehamn?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Jaro vs Mariehamn: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


