JDFS Alberts vs Mārupe: match statistics
JDFS Alberts vs Mārupe: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
JDFS Alberts played against Mārupe in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on April 25, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
JDFS Alberts has 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Mārupe has 2 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 1.75 points per game.
Scoring records
JDFS Alberts scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 1.33. Mārupe scores 2.50 and allows 0.75. Games in this league average 3.48 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of JDFS Alberts's games and 25% of Mārupe's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 75%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 70% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Mārupe has the higher season xG average, 1.83 to 1.65 per game. JDFS Alberts takes 12.3 shots per game, while Mārupe takes 14.3.
First-half and second-half trends
JDFS Alberts leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Mārupe leads at halftime in 50% and scores 2.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
JDFS Alberts's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (2 goals). For Mārupe, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.48 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 70% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Mārupe has a clearly superior goal output and form: 10 goals this season (10 in the last 5 matches) versus 4 goals for JDFS Alberts (4 in the last 5), and the visitors average 1.4 points in their last 5 matches compared to 0.8 points for the hosts. Home metrics favor JDFS: they have won 100% of home matches, average 2.0 goals per home game and have not conceded at home (average 0), with home xG 1.65 versus opponents’ xG 1.24. Mārupe, however, creates more clear-cut chances away: on average 3 shots on target per away match versus 2 for the hosts, away xG for the visitors is 1.27, and the side has conceded only 3 goals this season. Considering the higher number of goals scored (10 vs 4), better points-per-form in the last 5 matches (1.4 vs 0.8) and the advantage in shots on target, I give a slight edge to the visitors and tip them to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The main argument against BTTS - Yes is Mārupe — 100% clean sheets this season and a seasonal goals conceded average of 0.0, with a season BTTS rate of 0%. JDFS Alberts carry the offensive threat: 3.33 goals scored per game on average, xG 2.01 and 6.0 shots on target, but the hosts also register clean sheets in 67% of matches and have a season BTTS share of 33%. In the shorter term, over the last 5 matches Mārupe average 2.0 goals (10 total) with recent xG around 1.72, while JDFS average 0.8 goals in the last 5 and xG around 1.66, which indicates some potential for the visitors to score. However, given the seasonal 100% vs 67% clean sheets and season BTTS 0% vs 33%, the internal team indicators favor a 'No Goal' scenario; I assess 70% for No Goal and 30% for BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate 1.35 goals for JDFS Alberts (based on xG_for 2.01 and opponent xG_against 0.68) and 1.10 for Mārupe (xG_for 1.27 vs opponent xG_against 0.94), totaling 2.45 goals. JDFS at home has a seasonal average of 3.33 goals scored and averages 15.67 shots per match with 6.0 shots on target, which increases the likelihood of early goals. Mārupe scored 10 goals in their last 5 matches (avg 2.0) and has last5 xG_for 1.72, so the visitors also show offensive potential. The league averages 3.48 goals per match and 70% of fixtures finish over 2.5 goals, which supports the Over market, although the combined xG of 2.45 places the 2.5 line as balanced. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (high probability of at least 2 goals); therefore I recommend Over at the 1.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back 1/1 (48%) – home team leads at the break and wins. The home side led at half-time in 2 of 3 seasonal matches (leadingAtHT_home = 2.0, 67%) and score on average 0.67 goals by HT versus 0.0 for the visitors (scoredAVGHT_home 0.67 vs scoredAVGHT_away 0.0; GoalsHT_home 3.0 vs GoalsHT_away 0.0). Over the full match the hosts have a clear offensive advantage: on average 3.33 goals per game and xG 2.01 versus 0.0 and xG 1.27 for the opponents, they register 15.67 shots (6 on target) compared to 10.0 (3 on target) and convert 21% of shots versus 0% for the away side, which increases the chance of maintaining the lead. At the same time the visitors have 100% clean sheets and 100% draws in the data (seasonCSPercentage_away = 100.0, drawPercentage_away = 100.0), so I also assign a moderate probability to a draw (X/X 15%) or a turnaround to a draw after the break (1/X 12%). For these reasons the strongest signal is the home team leading at half-time and winning by full-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| JDFS Alberts | Mārupe | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.48 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Mārupe is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - JDFS Alberts · 1.75 pts / game - Mārupe
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mārupe is 88% better for: goals scored per game.
1.33 goals / game - JDFS Alberts · 2.5 goals / game - Mārupe
Mārupe is 77% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.33 goals / game - JDFS Alberts · 0.75 goals / game - Mārupe
JDFS Alberts scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 meczów), while Mārupe keeps a clean sheet in 75% (3 of 4 meczów).
Mārupe scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 meczów), while JDFS Alberts keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - JDFS Alberts
Over / Under - Mārupe
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mārupe is 430% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.33 pts / game - JDFS Alberts · 1.75 pts / game - Mārupe
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JDFS Alberts - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Mārupe - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.33 | 1.67 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.3 |
| Average goals per game | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 67% |
| No goal | 67% | 33% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.75 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.5 | 2.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 0.5 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.5 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 75% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 75% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 75% |
| No goal | 50% | 25% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
JDFS Alberts
Mārupe
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| JDFS Alberts | Liga | Mārupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.67 | 3.48 | ▼ 3.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 59% | ▼ 25% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 67% | 70% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 24% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 78% | ▼ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 81% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- MārupeGoalRoberts Čevers
- JDFS AlbertsGoalRihards Ozoliņš
- JDFS AlbertsGoalKārlis Pirktiņš
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from JDFS Alberts's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against Mārupe. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of JDFS Alberts vs Mārupe?
The 1. Liga match finished JDFS Alberts 2:1 Mārupe. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between JDFS Alberts and Mārupe?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches JDFS Alberts won 1, Mārupe won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before JDFS Alberts vs Mārupe?
JDFS Alberts score 1.33 goals per game on average and Mārupe 2.50. The 1. Liga average is 3.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 67% of JDFS Alberts's matches and 25% of Mārupe's.
What form are JDFS Alberts and Mārupe in?
Over the last 5 games JDFS Alberts have a 1-0-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Mārupe 2-1-1 (1.75 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JDFS Alberts vs Mārupe?
The statistical background for JDFS Alberts vs Mārupe — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.