JDFS Alberts vs Rīgas FS II: match statistics
JDFS Alberts vs Rīgas FS II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
JDFS Alberts played against Rīgas FS II in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on April 19, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
JDFS Alberts has 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Rīgas FS II has 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 0.33 points per game.
Scoring records
JDFS Alberts scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 2.00. Rīgas FS II scores 1.33 and allows 3.67. Games in this league average 3.48 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of JDFS Alberts's games and 67% of Rīgas FS II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 100%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 72% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
JDFS Alberts has the higher season xG average, 1.66 to 1.46 per game. JDFS Alberts takes 11.5 shots per game, while Rīgas FS II takes 9.7.
First-half and second-half trends
JDFS Alberts leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Rīgas FS II leads at halftime in 67% and scores 0.33 after halftime.
When the teams score
JDFS Alberts's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). For Rīgas FS II, it is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
1. Liga games average 3.48 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 72% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I assess that JDFS Alberts has the higher probability, therefore I predict a home win. This season the hosts have scored 2 goals in 2 matches (1.00 per match) and conceded 4 goals (2.00 per match), while Rīgas FS II has 4 goals in 3 matches (1.33 per match) and as many as 11 conceded (3.67 per match). In the last 5 fixtures JDFS have scored 4 goals (0.8 per match) and conceded 5 (1.0 per match) with a record of 1 win and 1 draw, whereas the visitors have scored 8 goals (1.6 per match) and conceded 16 (3.2 per match) with 0 wins and 2 draws. The defensive disparity is decisive — the hosts concede on average 1.0 goal per match over the last five games versus 3.2 for the opponents — and additionally JDFS has a higher average points return in this run (0.8 vs 0.4), which leads me to select the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Data analysis favors the BTTS 'Yes' scenario: JDFS Alberts has a season BTTS rate of 67%, while Rīgas FS II records 80% BTTS in their last 5 matches. The league is high-scoring with an average of 3.62 goals per match and a season BTTS of 62%, which increases the likelihood of reciprocated scoring. In their last 5 matches Rīgas FS II has conceded an average of 3.2 goals (16 in 5), and JDFS concedes 1.0 goals (5 in 5), while recent xG is 2.12 for Rīgas and 1.96 for JDFS, meaning both teams create almost 2 xG per match. Additionally, the home side has 100% of matches over 2.5 goals this season, with 67% of those also being BTTS, so high-scoring games here are often accompanied by goals from both teams. Based on this, I project BTTS 'Yes' as the more likely outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect a high-scoring game: estimated xG are 2.23 for JDFS Alberts and 1.55 for Rīgas FS II, totaling 3.78 expected goals. Calculation is based on averages from the last 5 matches: hosts have xG 1.96, away side have xG 2.12; opponents recently conceded an average of 2.50 xG per match for the guests and 0.98 xG for the hosts; averaging the pairs (1.96 with 2.50 and 2.12 with 0.98) produced 2.23 and 1.55. Additionally, JDFS Alberts have 100% of season matches over 2.5 goals, the league average is 3.62 goals and 76% of matches finish over 2.5, which reinforces the high-scoring signal. Rīgas FS II in the last 5 matches scored 8 and conceded 16 goals (avg 1.6 scored and 3.2 conceded), and 80% of those games were over 2.5 goals, so the away defense is vulnerable. On this basis I recommend Over 2.5 as the strongest signal (probability Over 2.5 ~73%, Over 1.5 ~89%, Over 3.5 ~52%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonal home data show that they led at the break in 2 of 3 matches (67%), scoring an average of 1.0 goals by halftime and conceding 0.33 in the first half. However, over the full match the hosts average 1.33 goals scored versus 3.67 conceded, with home xG of 1.46 compared to opponents’ 2.23 xG, indicating a defensive deficit despite reasonable chance creation. They are particularly vulnerable in the second half — conceding an average of 3.33 goals after the break, with a second-half goal difference of -9 and 5 goals conceded in minutes 76–90. As a result, leads at the break rarely convert to wins (0% home wins and 67% losses on the season), so the most likely scenario is a lead at the break followed by a turnaround and defeat (HT/FT 1/2). Additionally, the away data are sparse (many values 0.0, e.g. season away goals average 0.0), which increases uncertainty and justifies assigning 45% to 1/2, 15% to 1/X and 25% to 2/2, with smaller shares for the remaining scenarios.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| JDFS Alberts | Rīgas FS II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 52% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Rīgas FS II is 33% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - JDFS Alberts · 1.33 goals / game - Rīgas FS II
JDFS Alberts is 84% better for: goals allowed per game.
2 goals / game - JDFS Alberts · 3.67 goals / game - Rīgas FS II
JDFS Alberts scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 games), while Rīgas FS II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 games).
Rīgas FS II scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 games), while JDFS Alberts keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - JDFS Alberts
Over / Under - Rīgas FS II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
JDFS Alberts - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Rīgas FS II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 3.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.5 | 0.5 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 50% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 3.3 |
| Average goals per game | 1.3 | 3.7 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 67% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 0% |
| No goal | 33% | 67% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -9 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
JDFS Alberts
Rīgas FS II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).
Teams vs league
| JDFS Alberts | Liga | Rīgas FS II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.00 | 3.48 | ▲ 5.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 64% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 72% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 22% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 80% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 80% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- JDFS AlbertsGoalMatīss ZēģeleAssist: Markus Prohorenkovs
- JDFS AlbertsGoalMarkus Prohorenkovs
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from JDFS Alberts's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Rīgas FS II. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of JDFS Alberts vs Rīgas FS II?
The 1. Liga match finished JDFS Alberts 2:0 Rīgas FS II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between JDFS Alberts and Rīgas FS II?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches JDFS Alberts won 2, Rīgas FS II won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before JDFS Alberts vs Rīgas FS II?
JDFS Alberts score 1.00 goals per game on average and Rīgas FS II 1.33. The 1. Liga average is 3.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 100% of JDFS Alberts's matches and 67% of Rīgas FS II's.
What form are JDFS Alberts and Rīgas FS II in?
Over the last 5 games JDFS Alberts have a 0-0-2 record (0.00 points per game) and Rīgas FS II 0-1-2 (0.33 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for JDFS Alberts vs Rīgas FS II?
The statistical background for JDFS Alberts vs Rīgas FS II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


